Protection of mice against experimental cryptococcosis by anti-Cryptococcus neoformans monoclonal antibody
Open accessAbstract
Humoral immunity does not play a prominent role during experimental cryptococcosis. However, previous studies have shown that immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-Cryptococcus neoformans antibodies can mediate cell-dependent yeast killing in vitro. Therefore, the protective effect of a previously described monoclonal IgG1 anti-C. neoformans antibody (E1) administered intraperitoneally 24 h before intravenous infection with a C. neoformans serotype A strain was evaluated in mice. Heavily infected (3 X 10(6) cells) untreated mice died in 2.9 +/- 0.5 (standard deviation) days. Survival time was 17.9 +/- 1.6 days for mice treated with 100 micrograms of E1 and 3.0 +/- 0.7 days for mice treated with 100 micrograms of a monoclonal IgG1 anti-thyroglobulin antibody used as a control. Protection was dose dependent and required at least 10 micrograms of E1 (mean antibody concentration in serum +/- standard deviation, 6.6 +/- 2.3 micrograms/ml). Insufficient concentrations of IgG anti-C. neoformans antibody could explain previous negative results obtained with polyclonal immune serum. After infection with a smaller inoculum (5 X 10(3) to 5 X 10(4)), the protective effect of E1 was confirmed by the presence of fewer CFUs in the spleens and brains of treated mice than in those of controls. CFU were still detected in the brains of protected mice 5 days after infection, although soluble antigen was negative in sera. These results suggest that passive serotherapy with monoclonal IgG antibodies could participate in the prevention or treatment of experimental cryptococcosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A monoclonal antibody specific for the C. neoformans polysaccharide capsule was protective against cryptococcal infection in mice.
“In addition to cell-mediated immunity, pioneering work established that a monoclonal antibody specific for the C. neoformans polysaccharide capsule was protective against cryptococcal infection in mice126,127.”
From Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook (2021) · cites this paper as [126]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 243
- Authors
- Dromer, F., Charreire, J., Contrepois, A., Carbon, C., & Yeni, P.
- ORCID
- Dromer, F
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 749-752
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- PMC
- PMC260405
- OpenAlex
- W2114512296
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Infection and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
- Keywords
- cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, monoclonal antibodies, passive immunization, IgG1, humoral immunity, survival protection, dose dependence, serotype A
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Fungal, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antigens, Fungal, Brain, Cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunization, Passive, Male, Mice, Inbred DBA, Spleen, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review