The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Purification, characterization, and toxicity of the sulfhydryl-activated hemolysin listeriolysin O from Listeria monocytogenes
Open accessAbstract
We purified and characterized an extracellular hemolysin produced by Listeria monocytogenes. Hemolysin production was greatly enhanced by growing bacteria in resin (Chelex)-treated medium. This hemolysin was separated as a homogeneous protein of 60,000 daltons by using thiol-disulfide exchange affinity chromatography. This protein was a sulfhydryl-activated toxin, termed listeriolysin O, which shared the classical properties of other bacterial sulfhydryl-activated toxins: inhibition by very low amounts of cholesterol; activation by reducing agents and suppression of the lytic activity by oxidation; antigenic cross-reactivity with streptolysin O. However, listeriolysin O differed remarkably from the other sulfhydryl-activated toxins in that its cytolytic activity towards erythrocytes from various animal species was maximum at low pH (approximately 5.5) and was undetectable at pH 7.0. This suggests that the lytic activity of the toxin in host tissues might be better expressed in the acidic microenvironment, including macrophage phagosomes where bacteria presumably replicate. Listeriolysin O was lethal to mice (50% lethal dose of ca. 0.8 microgram) and induced a rapid inflammatory reaction when injected intradermally. These results favor the view that listeriolysin O might play a major role during intracellular replication of L. monocytogenes, ultimately promoting death of infected macrophages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The significance of iron in infection
Bullen, J. J. (1981) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/3.6.1127 · Cited by 603
Cited by
RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications
O’Brien, K., Breyne, K., Ughetto, S., Laurent, L. C., & Breakefield, X. O. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0251-y · Cited by 1,811
Surviving the Acid Test: Responses of Gram-Positive Bacteria to Low pH
Cotter, P. D., & Hill, C. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.3.429-453.2003 · Cited by 1,379
Gaillard, J.-L., Berche, P., Frehel, C., Gouln, E., & Cossart, P. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90009-n · Cited by 835
Self-citationBielecki, J., Youngman, P., Connelly, P., & Portnoy, D. A. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/345175a0 · Cited by 351
Listeriolysin O: the Swiss army knife of Listeria
Hamon, M. A., Ribet, D., Stavru, F., & Cossart, P. (2012) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.04.006 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Geoffroy, C., Gaillard, J. L., Alouf, J. E., & Berche, P.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1641-1646
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2154543397
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Purification, characterization, and toxicity of the sulfhydryl-activated hemolysin listeriolysin O from Listeria monocytogenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.55.7.1641-1646.1987
- The paper
- Geoffroy, C., Gaillard, J. L., Alouf, J. E., & Berche, P. (1987). Purification, characterization, and toxicity of the sulfhydryl-activated hemolysin listeriolysin O from Listeria monocytogenes. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.55.7.1641-1646.1987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.