The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharide (CP) vaccine and CP-specific antibodies protect mice against bacterial challenge
Open accessAbstract
The efficacy of capsular polysaccharide (CP)-specific antibodies elicited by active immunization with vaccines composed of Staphylococcus aureus types 5 and 8 CP linked to Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoprotein A or with immune immunoglobulin G (I-IgG) obtained from vaccinated plasma donors was tested in lethal and sublethal bacterial mouse challenge models. A dose of 2 x 10(5) CFU of S. aureus type 5 CP per mouse administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 5% hog mucin was found to cause 80 to 100% mortality in BALB/c mice within 2 to 5 days. Mice passively immunized i.p. 24 h earlier or subcutaneously 48 h earlier with 0.5 ml of I-IgG showed significantly higher average survival rates than animals receiving standard IgG or saline (P < 0.01) following the bacterial challenge. Animals actively immunized with the monovalent type 5 CP-P. aeruginosa exoprotein A conjugate showed a survival rate of 73% compared with 13% in phosphate-buffered saline-immunized animals. The prechallenge geometric mean titer of type 5 CP antibodies in animals that died was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of animals which survived the challenge (95.7 versus 223.6 micrograms/ml, respectively). The IgG was further evaluated in mice challenged i.p. with a sublethal dose of 5 x 10(4) CFU per mouse. Serial blood counts were performed on surviving animals at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Surviving animals were sacrificed at 72 h, and bacterial counts were performed on their kidneys, livers, and peritoneal lavage fluids. Animals receiving I-IgG had lower bacterial counts in blood samples and lower bacterial densities in kidneys, livers, and peritoneal lavage samples than mice immunized with standard IgG (P < 0.05). These data suggest that S. aureus type 5 CP antibodies induced by active immunization or administered by passive immunization confer protection against S. aureus infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Staphylococcus aureus Capsular Polysaccharides
O'Riordan, K., & Lee, J. C. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.1.218-234.2004 · Cited by 586
Zhang, Y., Ren, S., Li, H., Wang, Y., Fu, G., Yang, J., Qin, Z., Miao, Y., Wang, W., Chen, R., et al. (2003) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03671.x · Cited by 388
Josefsson, E., Hartford, O., O'Brien, L., Patti, J. M., & Foster, T. (2001) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/324430 · Cited by 287
Ebert, T., Smith, S., Pancari, G., Clark, D., Hampton, R., Secore, S., Towne, V., Fan, H., Wang, X.-M., Wu, X., et al. (2010) · Human Antibodies · doi:10.3233/hab-2010-0235 · Cited by 50
Pancari, G., Fan, H., Smith, S., Joshi, A., Haimbach, R., Clark, D., Li, Y., Hua, J., McKelvey, T., Ou, Y., et al. (2012) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2012.00036 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Fattom, A. I., Sarwar, J., Ortiz, A., & Naso, R.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1659-1665
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W1523347396
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharide (CP) vaccine and CP-specific antibodies protect mice against bacterial challenge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.64.5.1659-1665.1996
- The paper
- Fattom, A. I., Sarwar, J., Ortiz, A., & Naso, R. (1996). A Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharide (CP) vaccine and CP-specific antibodies protect mice against bacterial challenge. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.64.5.1659-1665.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.