The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Staphylococcus aureus Serotype 5 Capsular Polysaccharide Is Antiphagocytic and Enhances Bacterial Virulence in a Murine Bacteremia Model
Open accessAbstract
Controversy persists over the role that the capsular polysaccharide plays in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. To address this issue, we compared the mouse virulence of S. aureus Reynolds and capsule-defective mutant strains cultivated under conditions of high or low capsule expression. Strain Reynolds cells cultivated on Columbia salt agar plates expressed ∼100-fold more type 5 capsular polysaccharide than did cells cultivated in Columbia salt broth. The relative virulence of strain Reynolds and its capsule-defective mutants after growth on either solid or liquid medium was examined in mice challenged intraperitoneally or intravenously. The results indicated that agar-grown Reynolds cells were cleared from the bloodstream of mice less readily than broth-grown Reynolds cells. When the parental and mutant strains were cultivated on solid medium, strain Reynolds sustained a higher level of bacteremia than did the capsular mutants. We performed in vitro opsonophagocytic killing assays to determine whether staphylococcal virulence for mice correlated with resistance to phagocytosis.S. aureus Reynolds cultivated on solid medium was susceptible to phagocytic killing only in the presence of specific capsular antibodies and complement. Strain Reynolds grown in broth showed opsonic requirements for phagocytic killing that were similar to those of the capsular mutants (grown in broth or on agar); i.e., the bacteria were opsonized for phagocytosis by nonimmune serum with complement activity. These studies indicate that optimal expression of capsule enhances bacterial virulence in the mouse model of bacteremia, probably by rendering the organisms resistant to opsonophagocytic killing by leukocytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus
Cheung, G. Y. C., Bae, J. S., & Otto, M. (2021) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2021.1878688 · Cited by 1,380
Howden, B. P., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Stinear, T. P., & Grayson, M. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-09 · Cited by 962
Staphylococcus aureus Capsular Polysaccharides
O'Riordan, K., & Lee, J. C. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.1.218-234.2004 · Cited by 586
Self-citationMetal ion acquisition in Staphylococcus aureus: overcoming nutritional immunity
Cassat, J. E., & Skaar, E. P. (2012) · Seminars in Immunopathology · doi:10.1007/s00281-011-0294-4 · Cited by 155
Moisan, H., Brouillette, E., Jacob, C. L., Langlois-Bégin, P., Michaud, S., & Malouin, F. (2006) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.188.1.64-76.2006 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Thakker, M., Park, J.-S., Carey, V., & Lee, J. C.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5183-5189
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2122011983
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staphylococcus aureus Serotype 5 Capsular Polysaccharide Is Antiphagocytic and Enhances Bacterial Virulence in a Murine Bacteremia Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.66.11.5183-5189.1998
- The paper
- Thakker, M., Park, J.-S., Carey, V., & Lee, J. C. (1998). Staphylococcus aureus Serotype 5 Capsular Polysaccharide Is Antiphagocytic and Enhances Bacterial Virulence in a Murine Bacteremia Model. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.66.11.5183-5189.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.