The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutation of luxS Affects Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus mutans
Open accessAbstract
Quorum sensing is a bacterial mechanism for regulating gene expression in response to changes in population density. Many bacteria are capable of acyl-homoserine lactone-based or peptide-based intraspecies quorum sensing and luxS-dependent interspecies quorum sensing. While there is good evidence about the involvement of intraspecies quorum sensing in bacterial biofilm, little is known about the role of luxS in biofilm formation. In this study, we report for the first time that luxS-dependent quorum sensing is involved in biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. S. mutans is a major cariogenic bacterium in the multispecies bacterial biofilm commonly known as dental plaque. An ortholog of luxS for S. mutans was identified using the data available in the S. mutans genome project (http://www.genome.ou.edu/smutans.html). Using an assay developed for the detection of the LuxS-associated quorum sensing signal autoinducer 2 (AI-2), it was demonstrated that this ortholog was able to complement the luxS negative phenotype of Escherichia coli DH5α. It was also shown that AI-2 is indeed produced by S. mutans. AI-2 production is maximal during mid- to late-log growth in batch culture. Mutant strains devoid of the luxS gene were constructed and found to be defective in producing the AI-2 signal. There are also marked phenotypic differences between the wild type and the luxS mutants. Microscopic analysis of in vitro-grown biofilm structure revealed that the luxS mutant biofilms adopted a much more granular appearance, rather than the relatively smooth, confluent layer normally seen in the wild type. These results suggest that LuxS-dependent signal may play an important role in biofilm formation of S. mutans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Oral Microbial Communities: Biofilms, Interactions, and Genetic Systems
Kolenbrander, P. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.413 · Cited by 894
Cited by
Dental Plaque as a Microbial Biofilm
Marsh, P. D. (2004) · Caries Research · doi:10.1159/000077756 · Cited by 763
Streptococcus Adherence and Colonization
Nobbs, A. H., Lamont, R. J., & Jenkinson, H. F. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00014-09 · Cited by 657
A Method for Quantitative Determination of Biofilm Viability
Welch, K., Cai, Y., & Strømme, M. (2012) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb3020418 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Merritt, J., Qi, F., Goodman, S. D., Anderson, M. H., & Shi, W.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1972-1979
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2121992777
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutation of luxS Affects Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus mutans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.71.4.1972-1979.2003
- The paper
- Merritt, J., Qi, F., Goodman, S. D., Anderson, M. H., & Shi, W. (2003). Mutation of luxS Affects Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus mutans. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.71.4.1972-1979.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.