The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Capsule Polysaccharide Mediates Bacterial Resistance to Antimicrobial Peptides
Open accessAbstract
The innate immune system plays a critical role in the defense of areas exposed to microorganisms. There is an increasing body of evidence indicating that antimicrobial peptides and proteins (APs) are one of the most important weapons of this system and that they make up the protective front for the respiratory tract. On the other hand, it is known that pathogenic organisms have developed countermeasures to resist these agents such as reducing the net negative charge of the bacterial membranes. Here we report the characterization of a novel mechanism of resistance to APs that is dependent on the bacterial capsule polysaccharide (CPS). Klebsiella pneumoniae CPS mutant was more sensitive than the wild type to human neutrophil defensin 1, β-defensin 1, lactoferrin, protamine sulfate, and polymyxin B. K. pneumoniae lipopolysaccharide O antigen did not play an important role in AP resistance, and CPS was the only factor conferring protection against polymyxin B in strains lacking O antigen. In addition, we found a significant correlation between the amount of CPS expressed by a given strain and the resistance to polymyxin B. We also showed that K. pneumoniae CPS mutant bound more polymyxin B than the wild-type strain with a concomitant increased in the self-promoted pathway. Taken together, our results suggest that CPS protects bacteria by limiting the interaction of APs with the surface. Finally, we report that K. pneumoniae increased the amount of CPS and upregulated cps transcription when grown in the presence of polymyxin B and lactoferrin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane
Vaara, M. (1992) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.56.3.395-411.1992 · Cited by 1,879
Cited by
Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Poirel, L., Jayol, A., & Nordmann, P. (2017) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00064-16 · Cited by 1,447
Polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: a critical review
Zavascki, A. P., Goldani, L. Z., Li, J., & Nation, R. L. (2007) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkm357 · Cited by 834
Innate immune responses to infection
Tosi, M. F. (2005) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.036 · Cited by 391
Molecular Pathogenesis of Klebsiella Pneumoniae
Li, B., Zhao, Y., Liu, C., Chen, Z., & Zhou, D. (2014) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.14.48 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Campos, M. A., Vargas, M. A., Regueiro, V., Llompart, C. M., Albertí, S., & Bengoechea, J. A.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7107-7114
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2124381039
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Capsule Polysaccharide Mediates Bacterial Resistance to Antimicrobial Peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.72.12.7107-7114.2004
- The paper
- Campos, M. A., Vargas, M. A., Regueiro, V., Llompart, C. M., Albertí, S., & Bengoechea, J. A. (2004). Capsule Polysaccharide Mediates Bacterial Resistance to Antimicrobial Peptides. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.72.12.7107-7114.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.