Cited by 109Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFungal and yeast genetics researchHeat shock proteins research

Osmotic control of opuA expression in Bacillus subtilis and its modulation in response to intracellular glycine betaine and proline pools.

Open access
Hoffmann, T., Wensing, A., Brosius, M., Steil, L., Volker, U., Bremer, E.·2013·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

Glycine betaine is an effective osmoprotectant for Bacillus subtilis. Its import into osmotically stressed cells led to the buildup of large pools, whose size was sensitively determined by the degree of the osmotic stress imposed. The amassing of glycine betaine caused repression of the formation of an osmostress-adaptive pool of proline, the only osmoprotectant that B. subtilis can synthesize de novo. The ABC transporter OpuA is the main glycine betaine uptake system of B. subtilis. Expression of opuA was upregulated in response to both sudden and sustained increases in the external osmolarity. Nonionic osmolytes exerted a stronger inducing effect on transcription than ionic osmolytes, and this was reflected in the development of corresponding OpuA-mediated glycine betaine pools. Primer extension analysis and site-directed mutagenesis pinpointed the osmotically controlled opuA promoter. Deviations from the consensus sequence of SigA-type promoters serve to keep the transcriptional activity of the opuA promoter low in the absence of osmotic stress. opuA expression was downregulated in a finely tuned manner in response to increases in the intracellular glycine betaine pool, regardless of whether this osmoprotectant was imported or was newly synthesized from choline. Such an effect was also exerted by carnitine, an effective osmoprotectant for B. subtilis that is not a substrate for the OpuA transporter. opuA expression was upregulated in a B. subtilis mutant that was unable to synthesize proline in response to osmotic stress. Collectively, our data suggest that the intracellular solute pool is a key determinant for the osmotic control of opuA expression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.01505-12

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 96 · Cited by 109

Authors
Hoffmann, T., Wensing, A., Brosius, M., Steil, L., Volker, U., & Bremer, E.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
2012-11-21
Volume
195
Issue
3
Pages
510-522
ISSN
0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058359737
Cited by
109
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bacteriology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
OpuA, betaine, proline, osmotic stress, osmoprotection, transcriptional regulation, L-carnitine, choline, Bacillus subtilis, osmolytes
MeSH terms
Bacillus subtilis, Bacterial Proteins, Betaine, Escherichia coli, Multigene Family, Osmolar Concentration, Osmotic Pressure, Plasmids, Proline, Sodium Chloride, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review