The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Different Biochemical Mechanisms Ensure Network-Wide Balancing of Reducing Equivalents in Microbial Metabolism
Open accessAbstract
To sustain growth, the catabolic formation of the redox equivalent NADPH must be balanced with the anabolic demand. The mechanisms that ensure such network-wide balancing, however, are presently not understood. Based on 13 C-detected intracellular fluxes, metabolite concentrations, and cofactor specificities for all relevant central metabolic enzymes, we have quantified catabolic NADPH production in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Paracoccus versutus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Sinorhizobium meliloti, and Zymomonas mobilis. For six species, the estimated NADPH production from glucose catabolism exceeded the requirements for biomass synthesis. Exceptions were P. fluorescens, with balanced rates, and E. coli, with insufficient catabolic production, in which about one-third of the NADPH is supplied via the membrane-bound transhydrogenase PntAB.P. versutus and B. subtilis were the only species that appear to rely on transhydrogenases for balancing NADPH overproduction during growth on glucose. In the other four species, the main but not exclusive redox-balancing mechanism appears to be the dual cofactor specificities of several catabolic enzymes and/or the existence of isoenzymes with distinct cofactor specificities, in particular glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase. An unexpected key finding for all species, except E. coli and B. subtilis, was the lack of cofactor specificity in the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, which contrasts with the textbook view of the pentose phosphate pathway dehydrogenases as being NADP+dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sazanov, L. A., & Jackson, J. B. (1994) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(94)00370-x · Cited by 205
Cited by
NADPH-generating systems in bacteria and archaea
Spaans, S. K., Weusthuis, R. A., van der Oost, J., & Kengen, S. W. M. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00742 · Cited by 373
Nikel, P. I., Chavarría, M., Fuhrer, T., Sauer, U., & de Lorenzo, V. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.687749 · Cited by 355
Self-citationBuescher, J. M., Moco, S., Sauer, U., & Zamboni, N. (2010) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac100101d · Cited by 340
Self-citationDijkstra, P., Thomas, S. C., Heinrich, P. L., Koch, G. W., Schwartz, E., & Hungate, B. A. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.018 · Cited by 253
Christodoulou, D., Link, H., Fuhrer, T., Kochanowski, K., Gerosa, L., & Sauer, U. (2018) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2018.04.009 · Cited by 214
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuhrer, T., & Sauer, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 191
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2112-2121
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2102062916
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different Biochemical Mechanisms Ensure Network-Wide Balancing of Reducing Equivalents in Microbial Metabolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.01523-08
- The paper
- Fuhrer, T., & Sauer, U. (2009). Different Biochemical Mechanisms Ensure Network-Wide Balancing of Reducing Equivalents in Microbial Metabolism. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01523-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.