The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Change from Homo- to Heterolactic Fermentation by Streptococcus lactis Resulting from Glucose Limitation in Anaerobic Chemostat Cultures
Open accessAbstract
Lactic streptococci, classically regarded as homolactic fermenters of glucose and lactose, became heterolactic when grown with limiting carbohydrate concentrations in a chemostat. At high dilution rates ( D ) with excess glucose present, about 95% of the fermented sugar was converted to l -lactate. However, as D was lowered and glucose became limiting, five of the six strains tested changed to a heterolactic fermentation such that at D = 0.1 h −1 as little as 1% of the glucose was converted to l -lactate. The products formed after this phenotypic change in fermentation pattern were formate, acetate, and ethanol. The level of lactate dehydrogenase, which is dependent upon ketohexose diphosphate for activity, decreased as fermentation became heterolactic with Streptococcus lactis ML 3 . Transfer of heterolactic cells from the chemostat to buffer containing glucose resulted in the nongrowing cells converting nearly 80% of the glucose to l -lactate, indicating that fine control of enzyme activity is an important factor in the fermentation change. These nongrowing cells metabolizing glucose had elevated (ca. twofold) intracellular fructose 1,6-diphosphate concentrations ([FDP] in ) compared with those in the glucose-limited heterolactic cells in the chemostat. [FDP] in was monitored during the change in fermentation pattern observed in the chemostat when glucose became limiting. Cells converting 95 and 1% of the glucose to l -lactate contained 25 and 10 mM [FDP] in , respectively. It is suggested that factors involved in the change to heterolactic fermentation include both [FDP] in and the level of lactate dehydrogenase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Poly-lactic acid synthesis for application in biomedical devices — A review
Lasprilla, A. J. R., Martinez, G. A. R., Lunelli, B. H., Jardini, A. L., & Filho, R. M. (2012) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.019 · Cited by 1,174
Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources1
Hofvendahl, K., & Hahn–Hägerdal, B. (2000) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/s0141-0229(99)00155-6 · Cited by 895
Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics
Molenaar, D., van Berlo, R., de Ridder, D., & Teusink, B. (2009) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2009.82 · Cited by 653
Antagonistic activities of lactic acid bacteria in food and feed fermentations
Lindgren, S. (1990) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/0378-1097(90)90703-s · Cited by 585
Microbial hyaluronic acid production
Chong, B. F., Blank, L. M., Mclaughlin, R., & Nielsen, L. K. (2005) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-004-1774-4 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, T. D., Ellwood, D. C., & Longyear, V. M. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1979-04
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-117
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1531704395
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Change from Homo- to Heterolactic Fermentation by Streptococcus lactis Resulting from Glucose Limitation in Anaerobic Chemostat Cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.138.1.109-117.1979
- The paper
- Thomas, T. D., Ellwood, D. C., & Longyear, V. M. C. (1979). Change from Homo- to Heterolactic Fermentation by Streptococcus lactis Resulting from Glucose Limitation in Anaerobic Chemostat Cultures. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.138.1.109-117.1979
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.