The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants affected in attachment to plant cells
Open accessAbstract
An analysis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants with Tn5 insertions in chromosomal DNA showed that the chromosome of A. tumefaciens codes for a specific ability of this bacterium to attach to plant cells. This ability is associated with tumorigenesis by A. tumefaciens, the ability of avirulent A. tumefaciens to inhibit tumorigenesis, and the ability to adsorb certain phages. A second class of chromosomal mutations affects tumorigenesis without altering the ability to attach to plant cells. The attachment of A. tumefaciens to plant cells was assayed by mixing radiolabeled bacteria with suspensions of tobacco tissue culture cells or freshly isolated Zinnia leaf mesophyll cells. Under the conditions of this assay, an avirulent Ti plasmid-cured strain attached to the same extent as the same strain containing pTiB6806. Six of eight avirulent mutants with Tn5 insertions in chromosomal DNA showed defective attachment, whereas two retained wild-type attachment ability. In contrast to the strains showing wild-type attachment, the attachment-defective mutants failed to inhibit tumorigenesis when inoculated onto Jerusalem artichoke slices before inoculation of a virulent strain and also showed a loss of sensitivity to two Agrobacterium phages. The loss of phage sensitivity appeared to be due to a loss of ability to adsorb the phages. Staining with Calcofluor indicated that the mutants retained the ability to synthesize cellulose fibrils, which have been implicated in the attachment process. Southern filter hybridizations demonstrated that each mutant contained a single Tn5 insertion, and genetic linkage between the Tn5 insertion in one mutant and the attachment phenotype has also been demonstrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
Cited by
Biological Control of Soilborne Plant Pathogens in the Rhizosphere with Bacteria
Weller, D. M. (1988) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.26.090188.002115 · Cited by 1,763
Agrobacterium -Mediated Plant Transformation: the Biology behind the “Gene-Jockeying” Tool
Gelvin, S. B. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.1.16-37.2003 · Cited by 1,379
Brencic, A., & Winans, S. C. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.1.155-194.2005 · Cited by 434
Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation: Biology and Applications
Hwang, H.-H., Yu, M., & Lai, E.-M. (2017) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0186 · Cited by 312
Genetic transformation of HeLa cells by Agrobacterium
Kunik, T., Tzfira, T., Kapulnik, Y., Gafni, Y., Dingwall, C., & Citovsky, V. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.4.1871 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Douglas, C. J., Halperin, W., & Nester, E. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1982-12
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1265-1275
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1543863849
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants affected in attachment to plant cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.152.3.1265-1275.1982
- The paper
- Douglas, C. J., Halperin, W., & Nester, E. W. (1982). Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants affected in attachment to plant cells. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.152.3.1265-1275.1982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.