The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of bacterial cellulose fibrils in Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection
Open accessAbstract
During the attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to carrot tissue culture cells, the bacteria synthesize cellulose fibrils. We examined the role of these cellulose fibrils in the attachment process by determining the properties of bacterial mutants unable to synthesize cellulose. Such cellulose-minus bacteria attached to the carrot cell surface, but, in contrast to the parent strain, with which larger clusters of bacteria were seen on the plant cell, cellulose-minus mutant bacteria were attached individually to the plant cell surface. The wild-type bacteria became surrounded by fibrils within 2 h after attachment. No fibrils were seen with the cellulose-minus mutants. Prolonged incubation of wild-type A. tumefaciens with carrot cells resulted in the formation of large aggregates of bacteria, bacterial fibrils, and carrot cells. No such aggregates were formed after the incubation of carrot cells with cellulose-minus A. tumefaciens. The absence of cellulose fibrils also caused an alteration in the kinetics of bacterial attachment to carrot cells. Cellulose synthesis was not required for bacterial virulence; the cellulose-minus mutants were all virulent. However, the ability of the parent bacterial strain to produce tumors was unaffected by washing the inoculation site with water, whereas the ability of the cellulose-minus mutants to form tumors was much reduced by washing the inoculation site with water. Thus, a major role of the cellulose fibrils synthesized by A. tumefaciens appears to be anchoring the bacteria to the host cells, thereby aiding the production of tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rhizosphere Bacterial Signalling: A Love Parade Beneath Our Feet
Somers, E., Vanderleyden, J., & Srinivasan, M. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/10408410490468786 · Cited by 565
Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria
Ross, P., Mayer, R., & Benziman, M. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.55.1.35-58.1991 · Cited by 1,231
“Cellulose is also not completely necessary for bacterial virulence, because transposon mutants deficient in cellulose synthesis retain their pathogenecity (98).”
BackgroundInfluentialBrencic, A., & Winans, S. C. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.1.155-194.2005 · Cited by 434
Biofilm formation in plant–microbe associations
Ramey, B. E., Koutsoudis, M., Bodman, S. B. V., & Fuqua, C. (2004) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.014 · Cited by 422
Exopolysaccharides producing rhizobacteria and their role in plant growth and drought tolerance
Naseem, H., Ahsan, M., Shahid, M. A., & Khan, N. (2018) · Journal of Basic Microbiology · doi:10.1002/jobm.201800309 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthysse, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1983-05
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 906-915
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2151749567
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of bacterial cellulose fibrils in Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.154.2.906-915.1983
- The paper
- Matthysse, A. G. (1983). Role of bacterial cellulose fibrils in Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.154.2.906-915.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.