The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular characterization and protein analysis of the cap region, which is essential for encapsulation in Bacillus anthracis
Open accessAbstract
By using genetic complementation tests with various in vitro-constructed mutants with mutations in the cap region (which is essential for encapsulation in Bacillus anthracis), we identified three cistrons, capB, capC, and capA, in this order of arrangement. Minicell analysis revealed that these cistrons produce proteins of 44, 16, and 46 kilodaltons, respectively. The complete nucleotide sequence of 3,244 base pairs covering the whole cap region was determined and revealed the existence of the three open reading frames of capB (397 amino acid residues; molecular weight, 44,872), capC (149 amino acid residues; molecular weight, 16,522), and capA (411 amino acid residues; molecular weight, 46,420) arranged in the order predicted by complementation tests. These three cistrons were all transcribed in the same direction from promoters unique to each cistron. Judging from the predicted amino acid sequence of the three proteins and from their localization and their sensitivity to various physicochemical treatments, they appeared to be membrane-associated enzymes mediating the polymerization of D-glutamic acid via the membrane. Capsular peptides immunologically identical to that of B. anthracis were found in B. subtilis, B. megaterium, and B. licheniformis, but no sequence homologous to the cap region was found in any of these bacilli other than B. anthracis. Using strains of B. anthracis with or without insertional inactivation of the cap region, we found that the capsule of B. anthracis conferred strong resistance to phagocytosis upon the bacterial host.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mock, M., & Fouet, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.647 · Cited by 894
Dixon, T. C., Meselson, M., Guillemin, J., & Hanna, P. C. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199909093411107 · Cited by 874
The production of poly-(γ-glutamic acid) from microorganisms and its various applications
Shih, I.-L., & Van, Y.-T. (2001) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00074-8 · Cited by 579
Genomics of the group of organisms
RASKO, D., ALTHERR, M., HAN, C., & RAVEL, J. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.005 · Cited by 470
Rendueles, O., Garcia-Garcerà, M., Néron, B., Touchon, M., & Rocha, E. P. C. (2017) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006525 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Makino, S., Uchida, I., Terakado, N., Sasakawa, C., & Yoshikawa, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 722-730
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1548638618
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular characterization and protein analysis of the cap region, which is essential for encapsulation in Bacillus anthracis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.171.2.722-730.1989
- The paper
- Makino, S., Uchida, I., Terakado, N., Sasakawa, C., & Yoshikawa, M. (1989). Molecular characterization and protein analysis of the cap region, which is essential for encapsulation in Bacillus anthracis. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.171.2.722-730.1989
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.