The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High-efficiency gene inactivation and replacement system for gram-positive bacteria
Open accessAbstract
A system for high-efficiency single- and double-crossover homologous integration in gram-positive bacteria has been developed, with Lactococcus lactis as a model system. The system is based on a thermosensitive broad-host-range rolling-circle plasmid, pG+host5, which contains a pBR322 replicon for propagation in Escherichia coli at 37 degrees C. A nested set of L. lactis chromosomal fragments cloned onto pG+host5 were used to show that the single-crossover integration frequency was logarithmically proportional to the length of homology for DNA fragments between 0.35 and 2.5 kb. Using random chromosomal 1-kb fragments, we showed that homologous integration can occur along the entire chromosome. We made use of the reported stimulatory effect of rolling-circle replication on intramolecular recombination to develop a protocol for gene replacement. Cultures were first maintained at 37 degrees C to select for a bacterial population enriched for plasmid integrants; activation of the integrated rolling-circle plasmid by a temperature shift to 28 degrees C resulted in efficient plasmid excision by homologous recombination and replacement of a chromosomal gene by the plasmid-carried modified copy. More than 50% of cells underwent replacement recombination when selection was applied for the replacing gene. Between 1 and 40% of cells underwent replacement recombination when no selection was applied. Chromosomal insertions and deletions were obtained in this way. These results show that gene replacement can be obtained at an extremely high efficiency by making use of the thermosensitive rolling-circle nature of the delivery vector. This procedure is applicable to numerous gram-positive bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726
Mierau, I., Kunji, E. R., Leenhouts, K. J., Hellendoorn, M. A., Haandrikman, A. J., Poolman, B., Konings, W. N., Venema, G., & Kok, J. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.10.2794-2803.1996 · Cited by 117
Gene transfer to Clostridium cellulolyticum ATCC 35319
Jennert, K. C. B., Tardif, C., Young, D. I., & Young, M. (2000) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-146-12-3071 · Cited by 112
Xiong, A., & Jayaswal, R. K. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.16.4024-4029.1998 · Cited by 100
Oxaran, V., Ledue-Clier, F., Dieye, Y., Herry, J.-M., Péchoux, C., Meylheuc, T., Briandet, R., Juillard, V., & Piard, J.-C. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050989 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Biswas, I., Gruss, A., Ehrlich, S. D., & Maguin, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3628-3635
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1902304336
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-efficiency gene inactivation and replacement system for gram-positive bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.175.11.3628-3635.1993
- The paper
- Biswas, I., Gruss, A., Ehrlich, S. D., & Maguin, E. (1993). High-efficiency gene inactivation and replacement system for gram-positive bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.11.3628-3635.1993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.