The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stress response of Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure
Open accessAbstract
The response of exponentially growing cultures of Escherichia coli to abrupt shifts in hydrostatic pressure was studied. A pressure upshift to 546 atm (55,304 kPa) of hydrostatic pressure profoundly perturbed cell division, nucleoid structure, and the total rate of protein synthesis. The number of polypeptides synthesized at increased pressure was greatly reduced, and many proteins exhibited elevated rates of synthesis relative to total protein synthesis. We designated the latter proteins pressure-induced proteins (PIPs). The PIP response was transient, with the largest induction occurring approximately 60 to 90 min postshift. Fifty-five PIPs were identified. Many of these proteins are also induced by heat shock or cold shock. The PIP demonstrating the greatest pressure induction was a basic protein of 15.6 kDa. High pressure inhibits growth but does not inhibit the synthesis of stringently controlled proteins. Cold shock is the only additional signal which has been found to elicit this type of response. These data indicate that elevated pressure induces a unique stress response in E. coli, the further characterization of which could be useful in delineating its inhibitory nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes
Potts, M. (1994) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.58.4.755-805.1994 · Cited by 1,382
H-NS: a universal regulator for a dynamic genome
Dorman, C. J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro883 · Cited by 578
Microbial inactivation by new technologies of food preservation
Mañas, P., & Pagán, R. (2005) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02561.x · Cited by 440
Alternative food-preservation technologies: efficacy and mechanisms
Lado, B. H., & Yousef, A. E. (2002) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01557-5 · Cited by 434
Environmental stress responses in Lactobacillus: A review
De Angelis, M., & Gobbetti, M. (2004) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200300497 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Welch, T. J., Farewell, A., Neidhardt, F. C., & Bartlett, D. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7170-7177
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1513237697
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stress response of Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.175.22.7170-7177.1993
- The paper
- Welch, T. J., Farewell, A., Neidhardt, F. C., & Bartlett, D. H. (1993). Stress response of Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.22.7170-7177.1993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.