The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative analysis of extreme acid survival in Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Escherichia coli
Open accessAbstract
Several members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were examined for differences in extreme acid survival strategies. A surprising degree of variety was found between three related genera. The minimum growth pH of Salmonella typhimurium was shown to be significantly lower (pH 4.0) than that of either Escherichia coli (pH 4.4) or Shigella flexneri (pH 4.8), yet E. coli and S. flexneri both survive exposure to lower pH levels (2 to 2.5) than S. typhimurium (pH 3.0) in complex medium. S. typhimurium and E. coli but not S. flexneri expressed low-pH-inducible log-phase and stationary-phase acid tolerance response (ATR) systems that function in minimal or complex medium to protect cells to pH 3.0. All of the organisms also expressed a pH-independent general stress resistance system that contributed to acid survival during stationary phase. E. coli and S. flexneri possessed several acid survival systems (termed acid resistance [AR]) that were not demonstrable in S. typhimurium. These additional AR systems protected cells to pH 2.5 and below but required supplementation of minimal medium for either induction or function. One acid-inducible AR system required oxidative growth in complex medium for expression but successfully protected cells to pH 2.5 in unsupplemented minimal medium, while two other AR systems important for fermentatively grown cells required the addition of either glutamate or arginine during pH 2.5 acid challenge. The arginine AR system was only observed in E. coli and required stationary-phase induction in acidified complex medium. The product of the adi locus, arginine decarboxylase, was responsible for arginine-based acid survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wolfe, A. J. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.1.12-50.2005 · Cited by 1,233
The effects of fermentation acids on bacterial growth
Russell, J. B., & Diez-Gonzalez, F. (1997) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60017-x · Cited by 498
Bavishi, C., & DuPont, H. L. (2011) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04874.x · Cited by 480
Acid stress responses in enterobacteria
Bearson, S., Bearson, B., & Foster, J. W. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10238.x · Cited by 486
Self-citationRichard, H., & Foster, J. W. (2004) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.186.18.6032-6041.2004 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, J., Lee, I. S., Frey, J., Slonczewski, J. L., & Foster, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 4097-4104
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1533135048
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative analysis of extreme acid survival in Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.177.14.4097-4104.1995
- The paper
- Lin, J., Lee, I. S., Frey, J., Slonczewski, J. L., & Foster, J. W. (1995). Comparative analysis of extreme acid survival in Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri, and Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.14.4097-4104.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.