Cited by 507Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyEscherichia coli research studiesProbiotics and Fermented Foods

The effects of fermentation acids on bacterial growth

Russell, James B., Diez-Gonzalez, Francisco·1997·Advances in Microbial Physiology

Abstract

Anaerobic habitats often have low pH and high concentrations of fermentation acids, and these conditions can inhibit the growth of many bacteria. The toxicity of fermentation acids at low pH was traditionally explained by an uncoupling mechanism. Undissociated fermentation acids can pass across the cell membrane and dissociate in the more alkaline interior, but there is little evidence that they can act in a cyclic manner to dissipate protonmotive force. Fermentation acid dissociation in the more alkaline interior causes an accumulation of the anionic species, and this accumulation is dependent on the pH gradient (delta pH) across the membrane. Fermentation acid-resistant bacteria have low delta pH and are able to generate ATP and grow with a low intracellular pH. Escherichia coli O157:H7 is able to decrease its intracellular pH to 6.1 before growth ceases, but this modest decrease in delta pH can only partially counteract the toxic effect of fermentation anion accumulation. Fermentation acid-resistant bacteria are in most cases Gram-positive bacteria with a high intracellular potassium concentration, and even acid-sensitive bacteria like E. coli K-12 have increased potassium levels when fermentation acids are present. Intracellular potassium provides a counteraction for fermentation acid anions, and allows bacteria to tolerate even greater amounts of fermentation anions. The delta pH-mediated anion accumulation provides a mechanistic explanation for the effect of fermentation acids on microbial ecology and metabolism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60017-x

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 130 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, J. B., & Diez-Gonzalez, F.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
Advances in Microbial Physiology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1997
Volume
39
Pages
205-234
ISSN
0065-2911 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1570063046
Cited by
498
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
5.92
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in microbial physiology/Advances in Microbial Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
fermentation acids, bacterial growth inhibition, low pH, proton motive force, intracellular pH, membrane potential, potassium accumulation, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Escherichia coli K-12, Gram-positive bacteria, microbial ecology
MeSH terms
Acids, Animals, Bacteria, Biological Transport, Fermentation, Food Microbiology, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Intestinal Diseases, Rumen, Silage, Soil Microbiology, Solvents, Acetic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review