The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A glutamate-dependent acid resistance gene in Escherichia coli
Open accessAbstract
Stationary-phase cultures of Escherichia coli can survive several hours or exposure to extreme acid (pH 2 to 3), a level well below the pH range for growth (pH 4.5 to 9). To identify the genes needed for survival in extreme acid, a microliter screening procedure was devised. Colonies from a Tn10 transposon pool in E. coli MC4100 were inoculated into buffered Luria broth, pH 7.0, in microtiter wells, grown overnight, and then diluted in Luria broth, pH 2.5, at 37 degrees C for 2 h. From 3,000 isolates screened, 3 Tet(r) strains were identified as extremely acid sensitive (<0.1% survival at pH 2.5 for 2 h). Flanking sequences of the Tn10 inserts were amplified by inverse PCR. The sequences encoded a hydrophobic partial peptide of 88 residues. A random-primer-generated probe hybridized to Kohara clones 279 and 280 at 32 min (33.7 min on the revised genomic map EcoMap7) near gadB (encoding glutamate decarboxylase). The gene was designated xasA for extreme acid sensitive. xasA::Tn10 strains grown at pH 7 to 8 showed 100-fold-less survival in acid than the parent strain. Growth in mild acid (pH 5 to 6) restored acid resistance; anaerobiosis was not required, as it is for acid resistance in rpoS strains. xasA::Tn10 eliminated enhancement of acid resistance by glutamic acid. xasA was found to be a homolog of gadC recently sequenced in Shigella flexneri, in which it appears to encode a permease for the decarboxylated product of GadB. These results suggest that GadC (XasA) participates in a glutamate decarboxylase alkalinization cycle to protect E. coli from cytoplasmic acidification. The role of the glutamate cycle is particularly important for cultures grown at neutral pH before exposure to extreme acid.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Surviving the Acid Test: Responses of Gram-Positive Bacteria to Low pH
Cotter, P. D., & Hill, C. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.3.429-453.2003 · Cited by 1,379
Control of Acid Resistance in Escherichia coli
Castanie-Cornet, M.-P., Penfound, T. A., Smith, D., Elliott, J. F., & Foster, J. W. (1999) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.181.11.3525-3535.1999 · Cited by 623
Functional Genomics: Expression Analysis of Escherichia coli Growing on Minimal and Rich Media
Tao, H., Bausch, C., Richmond, C., Blattner, F. R., & Conway, T. (1999) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.181.20.6425-6440.1999 · Cited by 566
Acid stress responses in enterobacteria
Bearson, S., Bearson, B., & Foster, J. W. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10238.x · Cited by 486
A glutamate decarboxylase system protects Listeria monocytogenes in gastric fluid
Cotter, P. D., Gahan, C. G. M., & Hill, C. (2001) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02398.x · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Hersh, B. M., Farooq, F. T., Barstad, D. N., Blankenhorn, D. L., & Slonczewski, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3978-3981
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1611980546
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A glutamate-dependent acid resistance gene in Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.178.13.3978-3981.1996
- The paper
- Hersh, B. M., Farooq, F. T., Barstad, D. N., Blankenhorn, D. L., & Slonczewski, J. L. (1996). A glutamate-dependent acid resistance gene in Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.13.3978-3981.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.