Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hypochlorous acid stress in Escherichia coli: resistance, DNA damage, and comparison with hydrogen peroxide stress

Open access
Dukan, S, Touati, D·1996·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

We have investigated the mechanisms of killing of Escherichia coli by HOCl by identifying protective functions. HOCl challenges were performed on cultures arrested in stationary phase and in exponential phase. Resistance to HOCl in both cases was largely mediated by genes involved in resistance to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In stationary phase, a mutation in rpoS, which controls the expression of starvation genes including those which protect against oxidative stress, renders the cells hypersensitive to killing by HOCl. RpoS-regulated genes responsible for this sensitivity were dps, which encodes a DNA-binding protein, and, to a lesser extent, katE and katG, encoding catalases; all three are involved in resistance to H2O2. In exponential phase, induction of the oxyR regulon, an adaptive response to H2O2, protected against HOCl exposure, and the oxyR2 constitutive mutant is more resistant than the wild-type strain. The genes involved in this oxyR-dependent resistance have not yet been identified, but they differ from those primarily involved in resistance to H2O2, including katG, ahp, and dps. Pretreatment with HOCl conferred resistance to H2O2 in an OxyR-independent manner, suggesting a specific adaptive response to HOCl. fur mutants, which have an intracellular iron overload, were more sensitive to HOCl, supporting the generation of hydroxyl radicals upon HOCl exposure via a Fenton-type reaction. Mutations in recombinational repair genes (recA or recB) increased sensitivity to HOCl, indicative of DNA strand breaks. Sensitivity was visible in the wild type only at concentrations above 0.6 mg/liter, but it was observed at much lower concentrations in dps recA mutants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.178.21.6145-6150.1996

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Dukan, S., & Touati, D.
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
1996-11
Volume
178
Issue
21
Pages
6145-6150
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W2148685325
Cited by
289
References
4
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hypochlorous acid stress in Escherichia coli: resistance, DNA damage, and comparison with hydrogen peroxide stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.178.21.6145-6150.1996
The paper
Dukan, S., & Touati, D. (1996). Hypochlorous acid stress in Escherichia coli: resistance, DNA damage, and comparison with hydrogen peroxide stress. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.21.6145-6150.1996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.