The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular evolution and diversity in Bacillus anthracis as detected by amplified fragment length polymorphism markers
Open accessAbstract
Bacillus anthracis causes anthrax and represents one of the most molecularly monomorphic bacteria known. We have used AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) DNA markers to analyze 78 B. anthracis isolates and six related Bacillus species for molecular variation. AFLP markers are extremely sensitive to even small sequence variation, using PCR and high-resolution electrophoresis to examine restriction fragments. Using this approach, we examined ca. 6.3% of the Bacillus genome for length mutations and ca. 0.36% for point mutations. Extensive variation was observed among taxa, and both cladistic and phenetic analyses were used to construct a phylogeny of B. anthracis and its closest relatives. This genome-wide analysis of 357 AFLP characters (polymorphic fragments) indicates that B. cereus and B. thuringiensis are the closest taxa to B. anthracis, with B. mycoides slightly more distant. B. subtilis, B. polymyxa, and B. stearothermophilus shared few AFLP markers with B. anthracis and were used as outgroups to root the analysis. In contrast to the variation among taxa, only rare AFLP marker variation was observed within B. anthracis, which may be the most genetically uniform bacterial species known. However, AFLP markers did establish the presence or absence of the pXO1 and pXO2 plasmids and detected 31 polymorphic chromosomal regions among the 79 B. anthracis isolates. Cluster analysis identified two very distinct genetic lineages among the B. anthracis isolates. The level of variation and its geographic distribution are consistent with a historically recent African origin for this pathogenic organism. Based on AFLP marker similarity, the ongoing anthrax epidemic in Canada and the northern United States is due to a single strain introduction that has remained stable over at least 30 years and a 1,000-mile distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting
Mueller, U. G., & Wolfenbarger, L. L. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01659-6 · Cited by 962
Mock, M., & Fouet, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.647 · Cited by 894
Dixon, T. C., Meselson, M., Guillemin, J., & Hanna, P. C. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199909093411107 · Cited by 874
A review of molecular recognition technologies for detection of biological threat agents
Iqbal, S. S., Mayo, M. W., Bruno, J. G., Bronk, B. V., Batt, C. A., & Chambers, J. P. (2000) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/s0956-5663(00)00108-1 · Cited by 507
Genomics of the group of organisms
RASKO, D., ALTHERR, M., HAN, C., & RAVEL, J. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.005 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Keim, P., Kalif, A., Schupp, J., Hill, K., Travis, S. E., Richmond, K., Adair, D. M., Hugh-Jones, M., Kuske, C. R., & Jackson, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 818-824
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2145809152
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular evolution and diversity in Bacillus anthracis as detected by amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.179.3.818-824.1997
- The paper
- Keim, P., Kalif, A., Schupp, J., Hill, K., Travis, S. E., Richmond, K., Adair, D. M., Hugh-Jones, M., Kuske, C. R., & Jackson, P. (1997). Molecular evolution and diversity in Bacillus anthracis as detected by amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.179.3.818-824.1997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.