Cited by 144Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingMicrobial Fuel Cells and BioremediationForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications

Physical Morphology and Surface Properties of Unsaturated Pseudomonas putida Biofilms

Open access
Auerbach, Ilene D., Sorensen, Cody, Hansma, Helen G., Holden, Patricia A.·2000·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

Unsaturated biofilms of Pseudomonas putida , i.e., biofilms grown in humid air, were analyzed by atomic force microscopy to determine surface morphology, roughness, and adhesion forces in the outer and basal cell layers of fresh and desiccated biofilms. Desiccated biofilms were equilibrated with a 75.5% relative humidity atmosphere, which is far below the relative humidity of 98 to 99% at which these biofilms were cultured. In sharp contrast to the effects of drying on biofilms grown in fluid, we observed that drying caused little change in morphology, roughness, or adhesion forces in these unsaturated biofilms. Surface roughness for moist and dry biofilms increased approximately linearly with increasing scan sizes. This indicated that the divides between bacteria contributed more to overall roughness than did extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on individual bacteria. The EPS formed higher-order structures we termed mesostructures. These mesostructures are much larger than the discrete polymers of glycolipids and proteins that have been previously characterized on the outer surface of these gram-negative bacteria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.182.13.3809-3815.2000

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AFM imaging and force spectroscopy were carried out in an aqueous medium because dried biofilms change in morphology, roughness or adhesion forces compared to moist biofilms.

    “AFM imaging and force spectroscopy were carried out in an aqueous medium because it has been shown that dried biofilms change in morphology, roughness or adhesion forces when compared to moist biofilms55.”

    From Pili and other surface proteins influence the structure and the nanomechanical properties of Lactococcus lactis biofilms (2021) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says the study's fresh and desiccated unsaturated biofilms had similar morphologies and that drying did not increase their surface roughness. The Results (page not provided) report no consistent difference in adhesion forces between dry and fresh biofilms. Although the Discussion notes that aquatic biofilms can shrink when dried, this paper's findings do not support the claimed changes in morphology, roughness, or adhesion forces as a reason to use an aqueous medium. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [7]7. Characklis, W. G., and K. C. Marshall. 1990. Biofilms: a basis for an interdisciplinary approach, p. 3-15. In W. G. Characklis and K. C. Marshall (ed.), Biofilms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
  2. [19]19. Gray, T. R. G., P. Baxby, I. R. Hill, and M. Goodfellow. 1968. Direct observation of bacteria in soil, p. 171-192. In T. R. G. Gray and D. Parkinson (ed.), The ecology of soil bacteria. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada.
  3. [45]45. Pietrasanta, L. I., D. Thrower, W. Hsieh, S. Rao, O. Stemmann, J. Lechner, J. Carbon, and H. G. Hansma. 1999. Probing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBF3CEN DNAkinetochore complex using atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 3757-3762.
  4. [50]50. Sayles, R. S. 1982. The profile as a random process, p. 91-118. In T. R. Thomas (ed.), Rough surfaces. Longman, London, England.
  5. [57]57. Welty, J. R., C. E. Wicks, and R. E. Wilson. 1984. Fundamentals of momentum, heat and mass transfer, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auerbach, I. D., Sorensen, C., Hansma, H. G., & Holden, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • <!--label omitted: 1-->Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management1 and
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
2000-07
Volume
182
Issue
13
Pages
3809-3815
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W2033798071
Cited by
144
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bacteriology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Pseudomonas putida, surface roughness, adhesion force, desiccation, relative humidity, extracellular polymeric substances, mesostructure, extracellular proteins, basal layer
MeSH terms
Pseudomonas putida, Biofilms, Microscopy, Atomic Force

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review