Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catabolite Repression of Escherichia coli Biofilm Formation

Open access
Jackson, Debra W., Simecka, Jerry W., Romeo, Tony·2002·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

Biofilm formation was repressed by glucose in several species of Enterobacteriaceae . In Escherichia coli , this effect was mediated at least in part by cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein. A temporal role for cAMP in biofilm development was indicated by the finding that glucose addition after ∼24 h failed to repress and generally activated biofilm formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.184.12.3406-3410.2002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, D. W., Simecka, J. W., & Romeo, T.
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
2002-06-15
Volume
184
Issue
12
Pages
3406-3410
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W2140196827
Cited by
178
References
3
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catabolite Repression of Escherichia coli Biofilm Formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.184.12.3406-3410.2002
The paper
Jackson, D. W., Simecka, J. W., & Romeo, T. (2002). Catabolite Repression of Escherichia coli Biofilm Formation. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.184.12.3406-3410.2002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.