The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Displays Multiple Phenotypes during Development as a Biofilm
Open accessAbstract
Complementary approaches were employed to characterize transitional episodes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development using direct observation and whole-cell protein analysis. Microscopy and in situ reporter gene analysis were used to directly observe changes in biofilm physiology and to act as signposts to standardize protein collection for two-dimensional electrophoretic analysis and protein identification in chemostat and continuous-culture biofilm-grown populations. Using these approaches, we characterized five stages of biofilm development: (i) reversible attachment, (ii) irreversible attachment, (iii) maturation-1, (iv) maturation-2, and (v) dispersion. Biofilm cells were shown to change regulation of motility, alginate production, and quorum sensing during the process of development. The average difference in detectable protein regulation between each of the five stages of development was 35% (approximately 525 proteins). When planktonic cells were compared with maturation-2 stage biofilm cells, more than 800 proteins were shown to have a sixfold or greater change in expression level (over 50% of the proteome). This difference was higher than when planktonic P. aeruginosa were compared with planktonic cultures of Pseudomonas putida . Las quorum sensing was shown to play no role in early biofilm development but was important in later stages. Biofilm cells in the dispersion stage were more similar to planktonic bacteria than to maturation-2 stage bacteria. These results demonstrate that P. aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during biofilm development and that knowledge of stage-specific physiology may be important in detecting and controlling biofilm growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“If this occurs, these microbes change their metabolism11 and a new ecology is set up with a modified microbiome.12,13”
From The Innate Immune System in Acute and Chronic Wounds (2016) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins.
O’Farrell, P. H. (1975) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)41496-8 · Cited by 19,248
Mass Spectrometric Sequencing of Proteins from Silver-Stained Polyacrylamide Gels
Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M. S., Vorm, O., & Mann, M. (1996) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac950914h · Cited by 8,996
A simplification of the protein assay method of Lowry et al. which is more generally applicable
Peterson, G. L. (1977) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(77)90043-4 · Cited by 8,531
Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels
Blum, H., Beier, H., & Gross, H. J. (1987) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/elps.1150080203 · Cited by 4,150
Biofilm formation as microbial development
O'Toole, G., Kaplan, H. B., & Kolter, R. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49 · Cited by 3,571
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Self-citationFlagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development
O'Toole, G. A., & Kolter, R. (1998) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01062.x · Cited by 2,697
O'Toole, G. A., & Kolter, R. (1998) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00797.x · Cited by 2,537
Görg, A., Postel, W., & Günther, S. (1988) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/elps.1150090913 · Cited by 2,401
Femtomole sequencing of proteins from polyacrylamide gels by nano-electrospray mass spectrometry
Wilm, M., Shevchenko, A., Houthaeve, T., Breit, S., Schweigerer, L., Fotsis, T., & Mann, M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379466a0 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Harry, J. L., M. R. Wilkins, B. R. Herbert, N. H. Packer, A. A. Gooley, and K. L. Williams. 2000. Proteomics: capacity versus utility. Electrophoresis6:1071-1081.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases
Hall‐Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W., & Stoodley, P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro821 · Cited by 7,133
Self-citationBiofilms as Complex Differentiated Communities
Stoodley, P., Sauer, K., Davies, D. G., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160705 · Cited by 3,151
“(51) have recently shown that quorum sensing does not account for all biofilm-specific protein production inP.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationUnderstanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents
Davies, D. G. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1008 · Cited by 2,786
Self-citationPhysiological heterogeneity in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & Franklin, M. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1838 · Cited by 2,327
Survival strategies of infectious biofilms
Fux, C. A., Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Stoodley, P. (2004) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.010 · Cited by 1,797
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sauer, K., Camper, A. K., Ehrlich, G. D., Costerton, J. W., & Davies, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Montana State University (US)
- Allegheny-Singer Research Institute (US)
- Binghamton University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-02-15
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1140-1154
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- PMC
- PMC134825
- OpenAlex
- W2122608498
- Cited by
- 1,691
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 70
- FWCI
- 20.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Bacteriology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Montana State University
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- National Institutes of Health
- Binghamton University
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC002148, R01DC004173, DC04173-01, DC-02148)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
- Keywords
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa, biofilm growth, biofilm maturation, biofilm dispersal, motility regulation, alginate production, quorum sensing, proteome, stage-specific gene expression, planktonic versus biofilm cells, biofilm physiology
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acids, Bacterial Proteins, Phenotype, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional, Oxidative Stress, Biofilms, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization, Proteome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
