The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cellular Stoichiometry of the Components of the Chemotaxis Signaling Complex
Open accessAbstract
The chemotactic sensory system of Escherichia coli comprises membrane-embedded chemoreceptors and six soluble chemotaxis (Che) proteins. These components form signaling complexes that mediate sensory excitation and adaptation. Previous determinations of cellular content of individual components provided differing and apparently conflicting values. We used quantitative immunoblotting to perform comprehensive determinations of cellular amounts of all components in two E. coli strains considered wild type for chemotaxis, grown in rich and minimal media. Cellular amounts varied up to 10-fold, but ratios between proteins varied no more than 30%. Thus, cellular stoichiometries were almost constant as amounts varied substantially. Calculations using those cellular stoichiometries and values for in vivo proportions of core components in complexes yielded an in vivo stoichiometry for core complexes of 3.4 receptor dimers and 1.6 CheW monomers for each CheA dimer and 2.4 CheY, 0.5 CheZ dimers, 0.08 CheB, and 0.05 CheR per complex. The values suggest a core unit of a trimer of chemoreceptor dimers, a dimer (or two monomers) of kinase CheA, and two CheW. These components may interact in extended arrays and, thus, stoichiometries could be nonintegral. In any case, cellular stoichiometries indicate that CheY could be bound to all signaling complexes and this binding would recruit essentially the entire cellular complement of unphosphorylated CheY, and also that phosphatase CheZ, methylesterase CheB, and methyltransferase CheR would be present at 1 per 2, per 14, and per 20 core complexes, respectively. These characteristic ratios will be important in quantitative treatments of chemotaxis, both experimental and theoretical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays
Hazelbauer, G. L., Falke, J. J., & Parkinson, J. S. (2008) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2007.09.014 · Cited by 632
Self-citationGreenfield, D., McEvoy, A. L., Shroff, H., Crooks, G. E., Wingreen, N. S., Betzig, E., & Liphardt, J. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000137 · Cited by 328
The ecological roles of bacterial chemotaxis
Keegstra, J. M., Carrara, F., & Stocker, R. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00709-w · Cited by 312
Efficient modeling, simulation and coarse-graining of biological complexity with NFsim
Sneddon, M. W., Faeder, J. R., & Emonet, T. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1546 · Cited by 288
Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli
Tu, Y., Shimizu, T. S., & Berg, H. C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0807569105 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M., & Hazelbauer, G. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-06-15
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3687-3694
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2134452786
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular Stoichiometry of the Components of the Chemotaxis Signaling Complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.186.12.3687-3694.2004
- The paper
- Li, M., & Hazelbauer, G. L. (2004). Cellular Stoichiometry of the Components of the Chemotaxis Signaling Complex. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.186.12.3687-3694.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.