The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competition and Coexistence between Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis in the Dental Biofilm
Open accessAbstract
The human mucosal surface is colonized by the indigenous microflora, which normally maintains an ecological balance among different species. Certain environmental or biological factors, however, may trigger disruption of this balance, leading to microbial diseases. In this study, we used two oral bacterial species,Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis(formerly S. sanguis), as a model to probe the possible mechanisms of competition/coexistence between different species which occupy the same ecological niche. We show that the two species engage in a multitude of antagonistic interactions temporally and spatially; occupation of a niche by one species precludes colonization by the other, while simultaneous colonization by both species results in coexistence. Environmental conditions, such as cell density, nutritional availability, and pH, play important roles in determining the outcome of these interactions. Genetic and biochemical analyses reveal that these interspecies interactions are possibly mediated through a well-regulated production of chemicals, such as bacteriocins (produced by S. mutans) and hydrogen peroxide (produced by S. sanguinis). Consistent with the phenotypic characteristics, production of bacteriocins and H 2 O 2 are regulated by environmental conditions, as well as by juxtaposition of the two species. These sophisticated interspecies interactions could play an essential part in balancing competition/coexistence within multispecies microbial communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes?
Marsh, P. D. (2003) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.26082-0 · Cited by 1,256
Oral Microbial Communities: Biofilms, Interactions, and Genetic Systems
Kolenbrander, P. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.413 · Cited by 894
Cited by
The Biology of Streptococcus mutans
Lemos, J. A., Palmer, S. R., Zeng, L., Wen, Z. T., Kajfasz, J. K., Freires, I. A., Abranches, J., & Brady, L. J. (2019) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0051-2018 · Cited by 794
Bacteriocin Production: a Probiotic Trait?
Dobson, A., Cotter, P. D., Ross, R. P., & Hill, C. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.05576-11 · Cited by 687
Bacterial diversity in the oral cavity of 10 healthy individuals
Bik, E. M., Long, C. D., Armitage, G. C., Loomer, P., Emerson, J., Mongodin, E. F., Nelson, K. E., Gill, S. R., Fraser-Liggett, C. M., & Relman, D. A. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.30 · Cited by 651
Streptococcus Adherence and Colonization
Nobbs, A. H., Lamont, R. J., & Jenkinson, H. F. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00014-09 · Cited by 657
Interspecies Interactions within Oral Microbial Communities
Kuramitsu, H. K., He, X., Lux, R., Anderson, M. H., & Shi, W. (2007) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00024-07 · Cited by 600
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreth, J., Merritt, J., Shi, W., & Qi, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7193-7203
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2141015679
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition and Coexistence between Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis in the Dental Biofilm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.187.21.7193-7203.2005
- The paper
- Kreth, J., Merritt, J., Shi, W., & Qi, F. (2005). Competition and Coexistence between Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis in the Dental Biofilm. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.187.21.7193-7203.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.