Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 38Fungal Infections and StudiesBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a Singleplex PCR Assay for Rapid Identification and Differentiation of Cryptococcus neoformans var.grubii, Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans, Cryptococcus gattii, and Hybrids

Open access
Feng, Xiaobo, Fu, Xiaohua, Ling, Bo, Wang, Lei, Liao, Wanqing, Yao, Zhirong·2013·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

A singleplex PCR assay using a single primer pair targeting the putative sugar transporter gene was developed here to distinguish Cryptococcus neoformans var.grubii,Cryptococcus neoformans var.neoformans, and Cryptococcus gattii according to the distinct size of the amplicon. The interspecies and intravarietal hybrids were also characterized on the basis of distinct combined profiles of amplicons. This PCR assay is a rapid, simple, and reliable approach suitable for laboratory diagnoses and large-scale epidemiologic studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.00064-13

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Feng, X., Fu, X., Ling, B., Wang, L., Liao, W., & Yao, Z.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Second Military Medical University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2013-06
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1920-1923
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2157319636
Cited by
38
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii, Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans, Cryptococcus gattii, interspecific hybrids, species identification, amplicon size, fungal hybridization
MeSH terms
Cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, DNA, Fungal, Humans, Microbiological Techniques, Molecular Sequence Data, Recombination, Genetic, Time Factors, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Cryptococcus gattii

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.