Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia/Pneumonia Plus Panel for Detection and Quantification of Agents of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Open access
Murphy, Caitlin N., Fowler, Randal, Balada-Llasat, Joan Miquel, Carroll, Amanda, Stone, Hanna, Akerele, Oluseun, Buchan, Blake, Windham, Sam, Hopp, Amanda, Ronen, Shira, Relich, Ryan F., Buckner, Rebecca, Warren, Del A., Humphries, Romney, Campeau, Shelly, Huse, Holly, Chandrasekaran, Suki, Leber, Amy, Everhart, Kathy, Harrington, Amanda, Kwong, Christina, Bonwit, Andrew, Dien Bard, Jennifer, Naccache, Samia, Zimmerman, Cynthia, Jones, Barbara, Rindlisbacher, Cory, Buccambuso, Maggie, Clark, Angela, Rogatcheva, Margarita, Graue, Corrin, Bourzac, Kevin M.·2020·Journal of Clinical Microbiology
DOI 10.1128/jcm.00128-20
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The ability to provide timely identification of the causative agents of lower respiratory tract infections can promote better patient outcomes and support antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Current diagnostic testing options include culture, molecular testing, and antigen detection. These methods may require collection of various specimens, involve extensive sample treatment, and can suffer from low sensitivity and long turnaround times. This study assessed the performance of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PN panel) and Pneumonia Plus Panel (PNplus panel), an FDA-cleared sample-to-answer assay that enables the detection of viruses, atypical bacteria, bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance marker genes from lower respiratory tract specimens (sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] fluid).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.00128-20

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Metadata

Authors
Murphy, C. N., Fowler, R., Balada-Llasat, J. M., Carroll, A., Stone, H., Akerele, O., Buchan, B., Windham, S., Hopp, A., Ronen, S., Relich, R. F., Buckner, R., Warren, D. A., Humphries, R., Campeau, S., Huse, H., Chandrasekaran, S., Leber, A., Everhart, K., Harrington, A., Kwong, C., Bonwit, A., Dien Bard, J., Naccache, S., Zimmerman, C., Jones, B., Rindlisbacher, C., Buccambuso, M., Clark, A., Rogatcheva, M., Graue, C., & Bourzac, K. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Published
2020-06-24
Volume
58
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
DOI
10.1128/jcm.00128-20
OpenAlex
W3021433090
Cited by
269
References
28
FWCI
17.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia/Pneumonia Plus Panel for Detection and Quantification of Agents of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.00128-20
The paper
Murphy, C. N., Fowler, R., Balada-Llasat, J. M., Carroll, A., Stone, H., Akerele, O., Buchan, B., Windham, S., Hopp, A., Ronen, S., Relich, R. F., Buckner, R., Warren, D. A., Humphries, R., Campeau, S., Huse, H., Chandrasekaran, S., Leber, A., Everhart, K., . . . Bourzac, K. M. (2020). Multicenter Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia/Pneumonia Plus Panel for Detection and Quantification of Agents of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00128-20

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.