Cited by 62Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal and yeast genetics research

Assessment of Candida glabrata Strain Relatedness by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Multilocus Sequence Typing

Open access
Lin, Chi-Yang, Chen, Yee-Chun, Lo, Hsiu-Jung, Chen, Kuo-Wei, Li, Shu-Ying·2007·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

In this study, 80 Candida glabrata isolates from intensive care unit and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients were typed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and mating type class determination. Among the 25 patients with multiple isolates, 19 patients (76%) contained multiple isolates exhibiting identical or highly related PFGE and MLST genotypes, which may indicate the maintenance or microvariation of one C. glabrata strain in each patient. However, isolates from six patients (24%) displayed different sequence types, PFGE genotypes, or mating type classes, which may indicate colonization with more than one clone over time or strain replacement. High correlations among PFGE genotypes, sequence types, and mating types were found (P < 0.01). MLST exhibited less discriminatory power than PFGE with BssHII. The genotypes, sequence types, and mating type classes were independent of anatomic sources, drug susceptibility, and HIV infection status.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.00699-07

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 62

Authors
Lin, C.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., Lo, H.-J., Chen, K.-W., & Li, S.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Taiwan Centers for Disease Control (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • National Health Research Institutes (TW)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2007-08
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
2452-2459
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2006138081
Cited by
62
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC002012, R01DC002014)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida glabrata, strain relatedness, multilocus sequence typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, mating type, strain replacement, microvariation, HIV infection, intensive care unit isolates, fungal genotyping
MeSH terms
Candidiasis, Genotype, Humans, Cluster Analysis, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field, Mycological Typing Techniques, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Molecular Epidemiology, Candida glabrata, Genes, Mating Type, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review