Cited by 58Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Genome Comparisons of Candida glabrata Serial Clinical Isolates Reveal Patterns of Genetic Variation in Infecting Clonal Populations

Open access
Carreté, Laia, Ksiezopolska, Ewa, Gómez-Molero, Emilia, Angoulvant, Adela, Bader, Oliver, Fairhead, Cécile, Gabaldón, Toni·2019·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Candida glabrata is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that currently ranks as the second most common cause of candidiasis. Although the mechanisms underlying virulence and drug resistance in C. glabrata are now starting to be elucidated, we still lack a good understanding of how this yeast adapts during the course of an infection. Outstanding questions are whether the observed genomic plasticity of C. glabrata plays a role during infection, or what levels of genetic variation exist within an infecting clonal population. To shed light onto the genomic variation within infecting C. glabrata populations, we compared the genomes of 11 pairs and one trio of serial clinical isolates, each obtained from a single patient. Our results provide a catalogue of genetic variations existing within clonal infecting isolates, and reveal an enrichment of non-synonymous changes in genes encoding cell-wall proteins. Genetic variation and the presence of non-synonymous mutations and copy number variations accumulated within the host, suggest that clonal populations entail a non-negligible level of genetic variation that may reflect selection processes that occur within the human body. As we show here, these genomic changes can underlie phenotypic differences in traits that are relevant for infection.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Genome comparisons of serial *Candida glabrata* clinical isolates show that infecting clonal populations carry non-negligible standing genetic variation, including non-synonymous changes enriched in cell-wall genes. A sequenced trio indicates most differences between serial isolates likely reflect pre-existing variation rather than mutations accumulated between sampling times.

Key findings

  • Across 11 isolate pairs and one trio from 12 patients, within-pair SNP densities were low (0.037–0.047 SNPs/Kb), confirming clonality, but hundreds of mutations separated strains; time between isolation and private SNP count showed a positive but non-significant trend (r = 0.46, p = 0.14).
  • Non-synonymous mutations were enriched in “fungal-type cell wall” genes; 180 genes were affected by non-synonymous mutations in only one isolate of a pair, and 49 private exonic INDELs affected 36 genes, 17 encoding cell-wall-associated proteins.
  • Structural variation included 42 duplicated genes in one isolate of a pair, 12 related to GPI-proteins/adhesins, five gene deletions, and aneuploidies of chromosomes C and E in CMRL2; CANGA2A/CANGA2B showed an aberrant MATa configuration.
  • In the SAT trio, all private mutations in SAT02PL had the same alternative nucleotide in the other two strains, suggesting pre-existing standing variation; SAT03BC and SAT02PL grew faster under H2O2 or pH 2, respectively, and SAT01BAL vs SAT03BC adherence differed significantly (p = 0.0011), with SAT03BC carrying a SIR4 non-synonymous mutation.

Methods

  • Reanalyzed 22 previously available whole-genome datasets from 11 matched pairs and sequenced a new trio (SAT01BAL, SAT02PL, SAT03BC) from one leukemic patient using Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired-end reads, with average coverage 463–575×; total 25 isolates from 12 patients.
  • Reads were mapped to the CBS138 reference; SNPs were called with GATK v3.6 using a haploid model and filters, structural variants were inferred from depth of coverage, and SNP patterns were analyzed by Multiple Correspondence Analysis.
  • Phenotypic assays for the SAT strains included growth curves under six stress conditions, biofilm formation, and antifungal susceptibility testing by EUCAST EDef 7.1.

Limitations

  • The paper states that two or three isolates per patient represent very poor sampling of the infecting population, that it cannot determine whether variation predated infection or arose during it, and that recurrent infection from related strains or a shared external reservoir cannot be fully discarded.
  • The paper states that mutation-rate/generation-time extrapolations involve strong assumptions and should be used with extreme care, and that limited strains make genetic–phenotype correlations difficult to validate.
  • Evident from the text: some structural analyses excluded chromosomes E and C from CMRL2 and pairs CMRL3/4 and CMRL5/6 due to aneuploidies or variable coverage, and the authors suspect possible mislabeling at data deposition for the CMRL1/CMRL2 FKS1 result.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00112

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 55 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The analysis provides a catalog of genetic variations existing within clonal infecting isolates.

    “Our results provide a catalog of genetic variations existing within clonal infecting isolates, and reveal an enrichment of non-synonymous changes in genes encoding cell-wall proteins.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The analysis revealed an enrichment of non-synonymous changes in genes encoding cell-wall proteins.

    “Our results provide a catalog of genetic variations existing within clonal infecting isolates, and reveal an enrichment of non-synonymous changes in genes encoding cell-wall proteins.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The non-resistant strain CMRL5 presented a non-synonymous mutation C128F in ERG9.

    “and, in addition, the non-resistant CMRL5, presented a non-synonymous mutation in ERG9 (C128F).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The results of the CMRL2 FKS1 gene could not be reproduced.

    “but we could not reproduce the results of CMRL2 FKS1 gene.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    FKS2 presented five non-private mutations.

    “In addition, FKS2 presented five non-private mutations (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 28
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall, we detected small differences between the two genomes of a pair, with 0.037 SNPs/Kb between CMRL3/CMRL4 as the lowest value, and 0.047 SNPs/Kb between DSY562/DSY565 as the highest value.

    “Overall, we detected small differences between the two genomes of a pair, with 0.037 SNPs/Kb between CMRL3/CMRL4 as the lowest value, and 0.047 SNPs/Kb between DSY562/DSY565 as the highest value (Figure 1A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For clonal strains isolated from the same patients at different days, there was a positive trend, but no significant correlation, between the number of private SNPs and time-span between isolations (r = 0.46, p-value = 0.14).

    “For clonal strains isolated from the same patients at different days, we observed a positive trend, but no significant correlation, between the number of private SNPs and time-span between isolations (r = 0.46, p-value = 0.14) (Figure 1B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most (161) genes with non-synonymous mutations in matched pairs also present mis-sense variants in comparisons of non-clonal strains from the same clade, while only 23 were exclusive to comparisons among clonal isolates.

    “These comparisons revealed that most (161) genes with non-synonymous mutations also present mis-sense variants in comparisons of non-clonal strains from the same clade, while only 23 were exclusive to comparisons among clonal isolates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    With the exception of the pair NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, the rest of the clonal strains present additionally two non-synonymous mutations (S76P and T143P) in PDR1.

    “Also, with the exception of the pair NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, the rest of the clonal strains present additionally two non-synonymous mutations (S76P and T143P).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    CANGA2A and CANGA2B presented deletions in the MATalpha cassette (CAGL0B00242g and CAGL0B01243g) and a duplication in MATa (CAGL0E00341g).

    “Among all analyzed samples, CANGA2A and CANGA2B presented deletions in the MATalpha cassette (CAGL0B00242g and CAGL0B01243g) and a duplication in MATa (CAGL0E00341g), which suggest these strains present an abnormal configuration of mating type MATa (triple a), as previously shown for other strains (Carreté et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Genetic distance was also high between strain pairs isolated the same day but from different body sites and sometimes similar to those isolated from the same site at different days.

    “Moreover, the genetic distance was also high between strain pairs isolated the same day but from different body sites and sometimes similar to those isolated from the same site at different days (Figure 1B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    We detected 49 private exonic INDELs that differ between pairs of isolates, which globally affected 36 genes, of which 17 encoded cell wall associated proteins.

    “Overall, we detect 49 private exonic INDELs that differ between pairs of isolates, which globally affected 36 genes, of which 17 encoded cell wall associated proteins (Supplementary Table S2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    MCA analysis provided consistent results with previously published clades, and suggested that all these new strains could be ascribed to several of the previously described clades.

    “MCA analysis provided consistent results with previously published clades, and suggested that all these new strains could be ascribed to several of the previously described clades (Carreté et al., 2018): namely, pairs B1012M/B1012S and EB101M/BO101S belong to clade I; SAT strains to clade II; DSY562/DSY565 to clade III; P35_2/P35_3, CMRL1/CMRL2, and CANGA3A/CANGA3B strains belong to clade VI; NRZ-”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carreté et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    CMRL4 presents one private mutation G143V in FEN1.

    “Additionally, CMRL4 presents one private mutation in G143V (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    DSY562 and DSY565 share an additional non-synonymous mutation A942T, and four other MSH2 non-synonymous mutations are distributed in three other strain pairs.

    “We additionally found another non-synonymous mutation shared by these two strains (A942T), and four other MSH2 non-synonymous mutations distributed in three other strain pairs (Supplementary Figure S3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most tested conditions resulted in similar growth of the three clonal isolates, with the exception of oxidative (hydrogen peroxide) and acidic (pH2) stress conditions.

    “Most tested conditions resulted in a similar growth of the three clonal isolates, with the exception of oxidative (hydrogen peroxide) and acidic (pH2) stress conditions (Figure 4A and Supplementary Table S6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In our dataset, three different non-synonymous mutations were shared in three different pairs of isolates: V62I in CMRL1/CMRL2, E142K in NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, and M155T in SAT strains.

    “In our dataset, we observed three different non-synonymous mutations shared in three different pair of isolates: V62I in CMRL1/CMRL2, E142K in NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, and M155T in SAT strains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Non-synonymous mutations in genes potentially related to drug resistance were common, sometimes, but not always, correlating with experimentally determined lower susceptibilities to drugs.

    “We found that non-synonymous mutations in genes potentially related to drug resistance were common, sometimes, but not always, correlating with experimentally determined lower susceptibilities to drugs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SAT03BC and SAT02PL showed a faster growth rate as compared to the other isolates in the presence of hydrogen peroxide or low pH (pH = 2), respectively.

    “SAT03BC and SAT02PL showed a faster growth rate as compared to the other isolates in the presence of hydrogen peroxide or low pH (pH = 2), respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Genetically diverse C. glabrata lineages can recombine, leading to genetic admixture.

    “Another ability of C. glabrata that has been confirmed recently, using comparison of whole genome sequences, is that genetically diverse lineages can recombine, leading to genetic admixture (Dodgson et al., 2005; Carreté et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dodgson et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Carreté et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In C. albicans genome studies, serial isolates allowed the identification of alterations that may have contributed to drug resistance over the treatment course, including segmental aneuploidies, loss of heterozygosity, and gene-level alterations.

    “In genome studies of the other major yeast pathogen, C. albicans, serial isolates allowed the identification of several alterations that may have contributed to drug resistance over the treatment course, including segmental aneuploidies (Selmecki et al., 2006), loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in large parts of the chromosomes (Dunkel et al., 2008), and alterations at the gene level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Selmecki et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dunkel et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    C. glabrata is a haploid organism and thus, with the exception of aneuploidies, loss of heterozygosity does not play a role.

    “These include the fact that C. glabrata is a haploid organism and thus, with the exception of aneuploidies, LOH does not play a role.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gabaldón and Carreté, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There exists significant variation within C. albicans samples, suggesting that selection to become more resistant to drugs can shape the genetic variation of infecting populations.

    “Despite the usually clonal nature of clinical isolates obtained from the same patient, it is known that there exist significant variation within C. albicans samples, suggesting that selection to become more resistant to drugs can shape the genetic variation of infecting populations (Ford et al., 2015; Hirakawa et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ford et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hirakawa et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    C. glabrata presents different infection strategies and antifungal properties as compared to C. albicans.

    “In addition, C. glabrata presents different infection strategies and antifungal properties as compared to C. albicans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gabaldón and Carreté, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Genetic variation and the presence of non-synonymous mutations and copy number variations accumulated within the host.

    “Genetic variation and the presence of non-synonymous mutations and copy number variations accumulated within the host, suggest that clonal populations entail a non-negligible level of genetic variation that may reflect selection processes that occur within the human body.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The C. glabrata genome harbors several members of a specific gene family encoding epithelial adhesin proteins (EPA genes), which are considered a key factor in its ability to infect humans.

    “The C. glabrata genome harbors several members of a specific gene family encoding epithelial adhesin proteins (EPA genes), which are considered a key factor in its ability to infect humans (Cormack and Falkow, 1999; Roetzer et al., 2011; Gabaldón et al., 2013; Vale-Silva et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cormack and Falkow, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Roetzer et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gabaldón et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    These C. albicans studies could not differentiate between mutations that occurred during the course of infection or selection over pre-existing standing variation.

    “However, these studies could not differentiate between mutations that occurred during the course of infection or selection over pre-existing standing variation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    C. glabrata isolates can be ascribed to at least seven genetically distinct clades that lack a geographical structure.

    “In a recent study, we have shown that C. glabrata isolates can be ascribed to at least seven genetically distinct clades that lack a geographical structure (Carreté et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carreté et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The aberrant mating type configuration of CANGA2A/CANGA2B was not reported in a previous analysis of these strains.

    “The aberrant mating type configuration of CANGA2A/CANGA2B was not reported in a previous analysis of these strains (Håvelsrud and Gaustad, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Håvelsrud and Gaustad, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    FKS1 and FKS2 mutations can confer resistance to echinocandin drugs in C. glabrata.

    “it is known that FKS1 and FKS2 mutations can confer resistance to echinocandin drugs in C. glabrata (Katiyar et al., 2012; Arendrup and Perlin, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Katiyar et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Arendrup and Perlin, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    C. glabrata is likely able to undergo mating and introgression from differentiated strains.

    “Importantly, this study also revealed that C. glabrata is likely able to undergo mating and introgression from differentiated strains (Carreté et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carreté et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    L280F in PDR1 is known to mediate azole resistance in C. glabrata.

    “which is known to mediate azole resistance in C. glabrata (Ferrari et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ferrari et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The finding that two deletions appear only in the first isolate corroborates that many of the differences between strains may represent standing variation, as gene deletions cannot be reversed.

    “Two of the deletions appear only in the first isolate, which corroborates the previously mentioned finding that many of the differences between strains may represent standing variation, as gene deletions cannot be reversed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Genomes from a total of 25 isolates corresponding to twelve different patients were analyzed in a common analytical framework to avoid analytical biases.

    “Including the SAT strains, genomes from a total of 25 isolates corresponding to twelve different patients (Table 1) were analyzed in a common analytical framework to avoid analytical biases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Closely related strains belonging to the same clade can have large phenotypic differences.

    “Recent studies have shown that closely related strains belonging to the same clade can have large phenotypic differences (Carreté et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carreté et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The three SAT strains were sequenced using Illumina paired-end technology to an average coverage ranging from 463 to 575×.

    “The three strains were sequenced using Illumina paired-end technology to an average coverage ranging from 463 to 575×.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most recent analyses of C. glabrata isolates obtained from the same patient revealed very little genetic variation, supporting the idea that a single clonal population colonizes different body sites and jointly contributes to infection.

    “Most of these analyses revealed very little genetic variation, supporting the idea that a single clonal population colonizes different body sites and jointly contributes to infection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Singh-Babak et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Biswas et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Håvelsrud and Gaustad, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The coordinates S629P and S663P belong to hot spot regions in FKS1 and FKS2 in which mutations can confer elevated MICs.

    “These coordinates belong to hot spot regions in these two genes in which mutations can confer elevated MICs (Arendrup and Perlin, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Arendrup and Perlin, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    C. glabrata can undergo genomic re-arrangements as an adaptive survival mechanism.

    “Previous studies found that C. glabrata can undergo genomic re-arrangements as an adaptive survival mechanism (Shin et al., 2007; Muller et al., 2009; Poláková et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Shin et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Muller et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Poláková et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previously a MATa to MATalpha switching event has been described for the P35_2/P35_3 pair.

    “Previously a MATa to MATalpha switching event has been described already for the P35_2/P35_3 pair (Lin et al., 2007; Carreté et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lin et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Carreté et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Assuming a per base mutation rate similar to that of haploid yeasts (0.33 10-9 per base per generation), each generation one would expect 0.0041 mutations in the genome.

    “If we were to assume a per base mutation rate similar to that of haploid yeasts (estimated at 0.33 10-9 per base per generation) (Lynch et al., 2008), each generation one would expect 0.0041 mutations in the genome (0.33 10-9 × 12,3 106 bases in the genome = 4.1 10-3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lynch et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: The per base mutation rate of C. glabrata is similar to that of haploid yeasts, estimated at 0.33 10-9 per base per generation.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The genetic structure of C. glabrata populations suggests that humans may not be the natural niche for this yeast.

    “Moreover, the genetic structure of C. glabrata populations suggest that human may not be the natural niche for this yeast (Carreté et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carreté et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Assuming a doubling time close to 1 h in S. cerevisiae, the strains are separated by 374-474 days, or diverged 187-237 days ago.

    “Further assuming a doubling time close to 1 h in S. cerevisiae, these would suggest that these strains are separated by 374–474 days (or that they diverged 187–237 days ago).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The doubling time of C. glabrata is close to 1 h, as in S. cerevisiae.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Aberrant mating type switching events resulting in unorthodox configurations of the mating type loci are common among C. glabrata clinical isolates.

    “Aberrant mating type switching events resulting in unorthodox configurations of the mating type loci have been shown to be common among C. glabrata clinical isolates (Brockert et al., 2003; Carreté et al., 2018)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brockert et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Carreté et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    DSY562 and DSY565 both carry a V239L mutation in MSH2 and may display a faster evolutionary rate.

    “In a previous analysis it was reported that DSY562 and DSY565 both carry a V239L mutation in MSH2 and that these strains may display a faster evolutionary rate (Vale-Silva et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vale-Silva et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Two or three isolates per patient represent a very poor sampling of the infecting population, and the results should be confirmed with larger datasets.

    “Admittedly, two or three isolates per patient represent a very poor sampling of the infecting population and our results should be confirmed with larger datasets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SIR3 and SIR4 from several clinical isolates present a larger number of non-synonymous polymorphisms as compared to genes encoding other silencing proteins, and some such polymorphisms relate to different levels of silencing of target genes.

    “A recent study (Leiva-Peláez et al., 2018) has found that SIR3 and SIR4 from several clinical isolates present a larger number of non-synonymous polymorphisms as compared to genes encoding other silencing proteins, and that some such polymorphisms relate to different levels of silencing of target genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leiva-Peláez et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mutations in FEN1 have been related to acquisition of resistance to echinocandins in C. glabrata, with some mutations leading to reduced susceptibility to caspofungin but not to micafungin.

    “Mutations in the FEN1 gene have been related to acquisition of resistance to echinocandins in C. glabrata, with some mutations leading to reduced susceptibility to caspofungin but not to micafungin (Healey et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Healey et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SIR4 is a protein involved in subtelomeric silencing and regulation of biofilm formation.

    “a protein involved in subtelomeric silencing and regulation of biofilm formation (Iraqui et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Iraqui et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With the current sampling and the lack of knowledge on the mutation rate and generation time of C. glabrata, it is impossible to know whether the high genetic variability predated the infectious phase and represents genetic variability existing in a commensal population, or whether most observed genetic differences appeared during the course of infection.

    “With the current sampling and the lack of knowledge on the mutation rate and generation time of C. glabrata it is impossible to know whether this high genetic variability predated the infectious phase and represents genetic variability existing in a commensal population, or, alternatively, whether most of the observed genetic differences appeared during the course of infection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A large standing variation would be compatible with the infecting strains originating from an established commensal population rather than from a recent infection with few infecting cells.

    “Similarly, a large standing variation would also be compatible with the infecting strains originating from an established commensal population rather than from a recent infection with few infecting cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Genes encoding cell-wall proteins may be more mutagenic, given their subtelomeric localization and the presence of repeats.

    “Alternatively, genes encoding cell-wall proteins may be more mutagenic, given their subtelomeric localization and the presence of repeats.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mutations in MSH2, a mismatch repair gene, can influence the capacity to acquire resistance to drugs.

    “Additionally, it has been suggested that mutations in MSH2, a mismatch repair gene, can influence the capacity to acquire resistance to drugs (Healey et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Healey et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These estimates seem to suggest that the divergence of the strains is larger than the period between isolations, reinforcing the conclusion that many mutations observed between any pair of serial isolates represent standing variation.

    “Nevertheless these estimates seem to suggest that the divergence of the strains is larger than the period between isolations, reinforcing our conclusions that many of the mutations observed between any pair of serial isolates represent standing variation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
49 of 49
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    We lack a comprehensive understanding of how antifungal resistance or other adaptive processes develop during the course of an infection.

    “Development of antifungal resistance during treatment is another possible cause of treatment failure, but we lack a comprehensive understanding of how this or other adaptive processes develop during the course of an infection.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is very little information on the existing genetic diversity in pathogen populations infecting the same patient.

    “Similarly, there is very little information on what is the existing genetic diversity in pathogen populations infecting the same patient.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is unknown whether recombination can occur in the course of human infection or commensalism.

    “Although such studies show evidence for relatively recent recombination (i.e., unique to one or few isolates within a clade), it is unknown whether this recombination can occur in the course of human infection or commensalism.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The three strains represent subsequent isolates of an evolving clone.

    “Assuming the three strains represent subsequent isolates of an evolving clone, this would imply a very high number of reversions, something we consider unlikely.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This is the first trio of fully sequenced C. glabrata serial isolates.

    “This represents the first trio of fully sequenced C. glabrata serial isolates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The differences between sequential isolates likely originated within the patient.

    “We subsequently focused on detecting only those SNPs that differed between sequential isolates of the same pair or trio, as these had likely originated within the patient.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The per base mutation rate of C. glabrata is similar to that of haploid yeasts, estimated at 0.33 10-9 per base per generation.

    “If we were to assume a per base mutation rate similar to that of haploid yeasts (estimated at 0.33 10-9 per base per generation) (Lynch et al., 2008)”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The doubling time of C. glabrata is close to 1 h, as in S. cerevisiae.

    “Further assuming a doubling time close to 1 h in S. cerevisiae”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Each sampled strain has been in the patient for some time.

    “it can be assumed that each sampled strain has been in the patient for some time”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Candida infections are difficult to clear, particularly in immunocompromised persons, so continuous infection in hospitalized patients is the most plausible scenario.

    “(ii) Candida infections are difficult to clear, particularly in immunocompromised persons, suggesting continuous infection in hospitalized patients is the most plausible scenario;”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Most cases represent continuous infection.

    “a safe assumption is that most cases represent continuous infection”
11 of 11

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cell wall-encoding genes are highly variable and are probably unrelated to the petite phenotype.

    “Cell wall-encoding genes are known to be highly variable and are probably unrelated to the petite phenotype (20, 21).”

    From Overlooked <i>Candida glabrata</i> petites are echinocandin tolerant, induce host inflammatory responses, and display poor <i>in vivo</i> fitness (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results (Genetic Variation in Serial Clinical Isolates; page not provided) report an enrichment of mutations in cell-wall genes, supporting their high variability. The Discussion (page not provided) also discusses this variation, but the passages do not address whether those genes are related to the petite phenotype. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • SAT02PL sampling site changes from peritoneal to pleural

    Minor

    The text says SAT02PL was sampled from the pleural cavity, but Table 1 identifies its site as peritoneal fluid.

  • P35 isolate identifier disagrees with Table 1

    Minor

    The results repeatedly refer to a P35_2/P35_3 pair, whereas Table 1 lists the patient's two isolates as P35_1 and P35_2.

2 of 2

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 58

Authors
Carreté, L., Ksiezopolska, E., Gómez-Molero, E., Angoulvant, A., Bader, O., Fairhead, C., & Gabaldón, T.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Gabaldón, Toni
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2019-02-12
Volume
10
Pages
112-112
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913641029
Cited by
58
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España (BFU2015-67107)
  • European Research Council (ERC-2016-724173)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2014-642095)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida glabrata, candidiasis, clonal populations, genetic variation, non-synonymous mutations, copy number variation, cell wall proteins, genome plasticity, host adaptation, opportunistic fungal pathogens, drug resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review