Genome Comparisons of Candida glabrata Serial Clinical Isolates Reveal Patterns of Genetic Variation in Infecting Clonal Populations
Open accessAbstract
Candida glabrata is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that currently ranks as the second most common cause of candidiasis. Although the mechanisms underlying virulence and drug resistance in C. glabrata are now starting to be elucidated, we still lack a good understanding of how this yeast adapts during the course of an infection. Outstanding questions are whether the observed genomic plasticity of C. glabrata plays a role during infection, or what levels of genetic variation exist within an infecting clonal population. To shed light onto the genomic variation within infecting C. glabrata populations, we compared the genomes of 11 pairs and one trio of serial clinical isolates, each obtained from a single patient. Our results provide a catalogue of genetic variations existing within clonal infecting isolates, and reveal an enrichment of non-synonymous changes in genes encoding cell-wall proteins. Genetic variation and the presence of non-synonymous mutations and copy number variations accumulated within the host, suggest that clonal populations entail a non-negligible level of genetic variation that may reflect selection processes that occur within the human body. As we show here, these genomic changes can underlie phenotypic differences in traits that are relevant for infection.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Genome comparisons of serial *Candida glabrata* clinical isolates show that infecting clonal populations carry non-negligible standing genetic variation, including non-synonymous changes enriched in cell-wall genes. A sequenced trio indicates most differences between serial isolates likely reflect pre-existing variation rather than mutations accumulated between sampling times.
Key findings
- Across 11 isolate pairs and one trio from 12 patients, within-pair SNP densities were low (0.037–0.047 SNPs/Kb), confirming clonality, but hundreds of mutations separated strains; time between isolation and private SNP count showed a positive but non-significant trend (r = 0.46, p = 0.14).
- Non-synonymous mutations were enriched in “fungal-type cell wall” genes; 180 genes were affected by non-synonymous mutations in only one isolate of a pair, and 49 private exonic INDELs affected 36 genes, 17 encoding cell-wall-associated proteins.
- Structural variation included 42 duplicated genes in one isolate of a pair, 12 related to GPI-proteins/adhesins, five gene deletions, and aneuploidies of chromosomes C and E in CMRL2; CANGA2A/CANGA2B showed an aberrant MATa configuration.
- In the SAT trio, all private mutations in SAT02PL had the same alternative nucleotide in the other two strains, suggesting pre-existing standing variation; SAT03BC and SAT02PL grew faster under H2O2 or pH 2, respectively, and SAT01BAL vs SAT03BC adherence differed significantly (p = 0.0011), with SAT03BC carrying a SIR4 non-synonymous mutation.
Methods
- Reanalyzed 22 previously available whole-genome datasets from 11 matched pairs and sequenced a new trio (SAT01BAL, SAT02PL, SAT03BC) from one leukemic patient using Illumina HiSeq 2000 paired-end reads, with average coverage 463–575×; total 25 isolates from 12 patients.
- Reads were mapped to the CBS138 reference; SNPs were called with GATK v3.6 using a haploid model and filters, structural variants were inferred from depth of coverage, and SNP patterns were analyzed by Multiple Correspondence Analysis.
- Phenotypic assays for the SAT strains included growth curves under six stress conditions, biofilm formation, and antifungal susceptibility testing by EUCAST EDef 7.1.
Limitations
- The paper states that two or three isolates per patient represent very poor sampling of the infecting population, that it cannot determine whether variation predated infection or arose during it, and that recurrent infection from related strains or a shared external reservoir cannot be fully discarded.
- The paper states that mutation-rate/generation-time extrapolations involve strong assumptions and should be used with extreme care, and that limited strains make genetic–phenotype correlations difficult to validate.
- Evident from the text: some structural analyses excluded chromosomes E and C from CMRL2 and pairs CMRL3/4 and CMRL5/6 due to aneuploidies or variable coverage, and the authors suspect possible mislabeling at data deposition for the CMRL1/CMRL2 FKS1 result.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 55 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The analysis provides a catalog of genetic variations existing within clonal infecting isolates.
“Our results provide a catalog of genetic variations existing within clonal infecting isolates, and reveal an enrichment of non-synonymous changes in genes encoding cell-wall proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The analysis revealed an enrichment of non-synonymous changes in genes encoding cell-wall proteins.
“Our results provide a catalog of genetic variations existing within clonal infecting isolates, and reveal an enrichment of non-synonymous changes in genes encoding cell-wall proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The non-resistant strain CMRL5 presented a non-synonymous mutation C128F in ERG9.
“and, in addition, the non-resistant CMRL5, presented a non-synonymous mutation in ERG9 (C128F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The results of the CMRL2 FKS1 gene could not be reproduced.
“but we could not reproduce the results of CMRL2 FKS1 gene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
FKS2 presented five non-private mutations.
“In addition, FKS2 presented five non-private mutations (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
We did not detect any other switching event in the remaining pairs.
“Here, we did not detect any other switching event in the remaining pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All private mutations in the second isolate of the series (SAT02PL) had the same alternative nucleotide in the other two strains.
“We observed that all private mutations in the second isolate of the series (SAT02PL) had the same alternative nucleotide in the other two strains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Twelve of those duplicated genes were related with GPI-proteins and adhesins.
“Twelve of those duplicated genes were related with GPI-proteins and adhesins (PWP4, PWP6, PWP7, EPA11, AWP1, AWP2, CAGL0F09273g, CWP1.1, CAGL0J01774g, CAGL0J02530g, CAGL0L00227g, CAGL0M08756g).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The hot spot mutation S629P is present in the supposedly non-resistant strain labeled CMRL1.
“Instead our analysis, confirmed by manual inspection of the mapping reads (Supplementary Figure S2), suggests that the hot spot mutation (S629P) is present in the supposedly non-resistant strain, labeled as CMRL1 (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We detected a total of 180 genes affected by non-synonymous mutations only in one of the two pair of isolates.
“Overall, we detected a total of 180 genes affected by non-synonymous mutations only in one of the two pair of isolates (Supplementary Table S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two of the deletions appear only in the first isolate.
“Two of the deletions appear only in the first isolate, which corroborates the previously mentioned finding that many of the differences between strains may represent standing variation, as gene deletions cannot be reversed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We detected 42 duplicated genes in one of the two pair of isolates.
“Overall, we detected 42 duplicated genes in one of the two pair of isolates (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CANGA1B, CANGA2B, and CANGA3B share one INDEL in the same exonic position affecting gene CAGL0G04125g (SAG1), involved in cell adhesion.
“Intriguingly, CANGA1B, CANGA2B, and CANGA3B, share one INDEL in the same exonic position affecting gene CAGL0G04125g (named SAG1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae), involved in cell adhesion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The azole-resistant strain CMRL6 showed a private non-synonymous mutation R376Q in PDR1.
“The other azole resistant strain in the compared set, CMRL6, showed a different private non-synonymous mutation in PDR1 (R376Q)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The term 'fungal-type cell wall' was the only enriched term among genes with non-synonymous mutations.
“Notably, we found “fungal-type cell wall” as the only enriched term among genes with non-synonymous mutations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PDR1 presents the same two non-synonymous variants in all clonal strains.
“We observed that PDR1 presents the same two non-synonymous variants in all clonal strains (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We did not detect any other large chromosomal rearrangements in the remaining pairs.
“We did not detected any other large chromosomal rearrangements in the remaining pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Each of the pairs CANGA3A/CANGA3B, P35_2/P35_3, NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058 and the three SAT strains present one of five additional non-synonymous variants in PDR1.
“Furthermore, each of the pairs CANGA3A/CANGA3B, P35_2/P35_3, NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058 and the three SAT strains present one of five additional non-synonymous variants in PDR1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this survey all isolates from the same patient belonged to the same genetic clade.
“Thus, in this survey all isolates from the same patient belonged to the same genetic clade.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Mating type switching, as inferred from changes in coverage in mating genes, was detected as previously described.
“Mating type switching, as inferred from changes in coverage in mating genes was detected as previously described (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
When compared to the reference genome, genetic distances ranged from 2.35 SNPs/Kb in CRML6 to 6.34 SNPs/Kb in B1012M.
“When compared to the reference genome, we observed genetic distances that ranged from 2.35 SNPs/Kb in CRML6 to 6.34 SNPs/Kb in B1012M (Supplementary Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We detected five gene deletion events between strains of a pair.
“We detected five gene deletion events between strains of a pair (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The CMRL4 FKS2 mutation was confirmed.
“We here confirmed CMRL4 FKS2 mutation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The second isolate of the pair NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058 presented a non-synonymous mutation S663P in FKS2, which correlated with the acquisition of echinocandin resistance.
“the second isolate of the pair NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058 presented a non-synonymous mutation in FKS2 (S663P), which correlated with the acquisition of echinocandin resistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barber et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
This analysis revealed aneuploidies involving duplications of chromosome E and C in CMRL2.
“This analysis revealed aneuploidies involving duplications of chromosome E and C in CMRL2 (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
With the exception of the SAT strains, the rest of the strains with non-synonymous mutations in FEN1 presented lower susceptibility to echinocandin drugs in the second pair of isolate.
“With the exception of the SAT strains, the rest of strains with non-synonymous mutations in FEN1 presented lower susceptibility to echinocandin drugs in the second pair of isolate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Despite their clonal nature, the genetic diversity within an infecting clonal population is non-negligible and of the order of hundreds of mutations between any pair of strains.
“Our analysis of genetic variation in serial clinical isolates indicate that despite their clonal nature, the genetic diversity within an infecting clonal population is non-negligible and of the order of hundreds of mutations between any pair of strains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There are small but significant differences between the adherence levels of SAT01BAL and SAT03BC (p-value 0.0011).
“We observed small but significant differences between the adherence levels of SAT01BAL and SAT03BC (p-value 0.0011) (Figure 4B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
None of the SAT isolates had a lower susceptibility to antifungal drugs.
“Our test for antifungal susceptibility indicated that none of the isolates had a lower susceptibility, in accordance with the lack of observed mutations in typical drug resistance genes (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
SAT03BC contains a non-synonymous mutation in SIR4.
“SAT03BC was found to contain a non-synonymous mutation in SIR4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The analysis of private SNPs across all clonal pairs shows an enrichment of non-synonymous mutations affecting cell-wall proteins.
“Overall, the analysis of private SNPs across all clonal pairs shows an enrichment of non-synonymous mutations affecting cell-wall proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The blood isolate SAT03BC showed lower adherence as compared to the other two strains.
“Another interesting finding is the lower adherence of the blood isolate (SAT03BC) as compared to the other two strains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
All serially isolated strains from the same patient belonged to the same clade as defined in previous studies.
“All serially isolated strains from the same patient belonged to the same clade as defined in previous studies (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
DSY562/DSY565 do seem to have an increased mutation rate, with more accumulated mutations with respect to the time spanned between isolations.
“Consistent with the above mentioned report, DSY562/DSY565 do seem to have an increased mutation rate (more accumulated mutations with respect to the time spanned between isolations).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Other strains with MSH2 mutations showed typical, or even lower, levels of divergence to their respective isolate pairs.
“However, the other strains with MSH2 mutations showed typical, or even lower, levels of divergence to their respective isolate pairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the trio of isolates, the first and third isolate share mutations that are absent from the intermediate isolate.
“In addition, our analyses of a trio of isolates reveals that the first and third isolate share mutations that are absent from the intermediate isolate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One additional case of aberrant mating type switching was detected.
“and here we detect one additional such case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Most strains within a pair showed a very low density of SNPs (0.037-0.047 SNPs/Kb), confirming their clonal nature.
“Similarly, most strains within a pair showed a very low density of SNPs (0.037–0.047 SNPs/Kb), confirming their clonal nature (Biswas et al., 2017; Vale-Silva et al., 2017; Carreté et al., 2018).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In our dataset we have found between 0.037 and 0.047 SNPs/Kb in pairwise comparisons of serial isolates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Interpretationown data
Genomic changes can underlie phenotypic differences in traits that are relevant for infection.
“As we show here, these genomic changes can underlie phenotypic differences in traits that are relevant for infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The genetic variation may reflect selection processes that occur within the human body.
“Genetic variation and the presence of non-synonymous mutations and copy number variations accumulated within the host, suggest that clonal populations entail a non-negligible level of genetic variation that may reflect selection processes that occur within the human body.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Clonal populations entail a non-negligible level of genetic variation.
“Genetic variation and the presence of non-synonymous mutations and copy number variations accumulated within the host, suggest that clonal populations entail a non-negligible level of genetic variation that may reflect selection processes that occur within the human body.”
- Also stated in: § Genetic Variation in Serial Clinical Isolates · hedged
“Together these results suggest that the amount of genetic variation within a clonal population infecting the patient is non-negligible, and that most of the mutations found between two serial isolates may represent standing variation, rather than mutations accumulated in the time passed between the two isolations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Genetic Variation in Serial Clinical Isolates · hedged
- Premisecitation
The azole-resistant strain DSY565 presents a private non-synonymous mutation L280F in PDR1.
“As shown in another study (Vale-Silva et al., 2017), the azole-resistant DSY565 presents a private non-synonymous mutation (L280F) in PDR1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vale-Silva et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CMRL2, CMRL4, and NRZ-2016-058 were shown to be echinocandin resistant.
“DSY565, CMRL6, NRZ-2016-057, and NRZ-2016-058 were shown to be azole resistant; and CMRL2, CMRL4, and NRZ-2016-058 were shown to be echinocandin resistant (Biswas et al., 2017; Vale-Silva et al., 2017; Barber et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
As most of the sampled strains in the previous study are clinical isolates, these results may indicate that a subset of the identified mutations in non-clonal isolates may have accumulated during infections.
“As most of the sampled strains in the previous study are clinical isolates, these results may indicate that a subset of the identified mutations in non-clonal isolates may have accumulated during infections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Mislabeling at the data deposition step may explain the incongruency about the CMRL2 FKS1 mutation.
“We suspect that mislabeling at the data deposition step may explain this incongruency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The non-private FKS2 mutations represent natural variation unrelated to a resistant phenotype.
“Given the lack of correlation of these mutations to echinocandin resistance, this suggests that these non-private mutations represent natural variation unrelated to a resistant phenotype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Five other pairs of isolates (DSY562/DSY565, NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, CMRL1/CMRL2, CMRL3/CMRL4, and CMRL5/CMRL6) included in this study have been shown to present different resistance profiles to antifungal drugs.
“In addition, five other pairs of isolates (DSY562/DSY565, NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, CMRL1/CMRL2, CMRL3/CMRL4, and CMRL5/CMRL6) included in this study, have been shown to present different resistance profiles to antifungal drugs (Supplementary Table S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Supplementary Table S5
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
A significant fraction of the observed mutations, even between serially sampled isolates, were not accumulated in the time spanned between isolations; rather they were pre-existing and represent standing genetic variation present in the infecting population.
“These results suggest that a significant fraction of the observed mutations, even between serially sampled isolates, were not accumulated in the time spanned between isolations. Rather they were pre-existing and represent standing genetic variation present in the infecting population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
DSY565, CMRL6, NRZ-2016-057, and NRZ-2016-058 were shown to be azole resistant.
“DSY565, CMRL6, NRZ-2016-057, and NRZ-2016-058 were shown to be azole resistant; and CMRL2, CMRL4, and NRZ-2016-058 were shown to be echinocandin resistant (Biswas et al., 2017; Vale-Silva et al., 2017; Barber et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
These strains present an abnormal configuration of mating type MATa (triple a), as previously shown for other strains.
“Among all analyzed samples, CANGA2A and CANGA2B presented deletions in the MATalpha cassette (CAGL0B00242g and CAGL0B01243g) and a duplication in MATa (CAGL0E00341g), which suggest these strains present an abnormal configuration of mating type MATa (triple a), as previously shown for other strains (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The most parsimonious interpretation is that these SNPs represent pre-existing genetic variation within the host.
“The most parsimonious interpretation is that these SNPs represent pre-existing genetic variation within the host.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The three strains represent subsequent isolates of an evolving clone.
- Premisecitation
The original comparison of the two echinocandin resistant strains CMRL2 and CMRL4 with their susceptible paired strains reported mutations in FKS1 (S629P) and FKS2 (S663P), respectively.
“The original comparison of the two echinocandin resistant strains, CMRL2 and CMRL4, with their susceptible paired strains, reported mutations in FKS1 (S629P) and FKS2 (S663P), respectively (Biswas et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Biswas et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Most of the mutations found between two serial isolates may represent standing variation, rather than mutations accumulated in the time passed between the two isolations.
“Together these results suggest that the amount of genetic variation within a clonal population infecting the patient is non-negligible, and that most of the mutations found between two serial isolates may represent standing variation, rather than mutations accumulated in the time passed between the two isolations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The phenotypes of three pairs of serial isolates included here, B1012M/B1012S, EB101M/BO101S, and P35_2/P35_3, had been studied previously without remarkable differences between the pairs.
“The phenotypes of three pairs of serial isolates included here, B1012M/B1012S, EB101M/BO101S, and P35_2/P35_3, had been studied previously without remarkable differences between the pairs (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Even if the serial isolates come from two independent infections from related strains, the mutation set shared by serial isolates in different patients is likely enriched in mutations that accumulated during infections.
“However, even if that is the case our mutation set shared by serial isolates in different patients is likely to be enriched in mutations that accumulated during infections because:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Each sampled strain has been in the patient for some time.
- Rests on an assumption: Candida infections are difficult to clear, particularly in immunocompromised persons, so continuous infection in hospitalized patients is the most plausible scenario.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Most cases represent continuous infection.
- Interpretationreasoning
The MSH2 mutations shared by both strains of a pair (N890I and L810H) do not affect the capacity for DNA repair.
“This suggests that these mutations, at least the ones shared by both strains of a pair (N890I and L810H), do not affect the capacity for DNA repair (Supplementary Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The combination of the appearance of FKS and FEN1 mutations can jointly contribute to the acquisition of resistance to echinocandin drugs in C. glabrata.
“This suggest that the combination of the appearance of FKS and FEN1 mutations can jointly contribute to the acquisition of resistance to echinocandin drugs in C. glabrata.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Most mutations found between any pair of serial isolates may represent pre-existing mutations present in the population (standing variation), rather than mutations that occurred between the isolations.
“This suggests that most of the mutations found between any pair of serial isolates may represent pre-existing mutations present in the population (i.e., standing variation), rather than mutations occurred between the isolations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Our results, restricted to non-synonymous SNPs potentially accumulated within the host, suggest that the overall pattern present across clinical strains may result from selection processes that occur within the human body.
“Our results, restricted to non-synonymous SNPs potentially accumulated within the host, suggest that the overall pattern present across clinical strains may result from selection processes that occur within the human body.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The high similarity between all compared serial isolates makes the scenario of recurrent infection from different sources unlikely.
“In our view, the high similarity between all the compared serial isolates makes the scenario of recurrent infection from different sources unlikely”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The functional enrichment of non-synonymous mutations affecting cell-wall proteins was also detected among non-synonymous SNPs found in an overall comparison of clinical C. glabrata strains.
“This functional enrichment was also detected among non-synonymous SNPs found in an overall comparison of clinical C. glabrata strains (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The serial isolates are separated by around 9-11.4 103 generations.
“which would mean that these strains are separated by around 9–11.4 103 generations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The per base mutation rate of C. glabrata is similar to that of haploid yeasts, estimated at 0.33 10-9 per base per generation.
- Interpretationown data
Several non-synonymous point mutations and structural variants affect relevant genes and may potentially have phenotypic effects of relevance for treatment and infection outcomes.
“Finally, several non-synonymous point mutations and structural variants affect relevant genes and may potentially have phenotypic effects of relevance for the treatment and infection outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 28
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, we detected small differences between the two genomes of a pair, with 0.037 SNPs/Kb between CMRL3/CMRL4 as the lowest value, and 0.047 SNPs/Kb between DSY562/DSY565 as the highest value.
“Overall, we detected small differences between the two genomes of a pair, with 0.037 SNPs/Kb between CMRL3/CMRL4 as the lowest value, and 0.047 SNPs/Kb between DSY562/DSY565 as the highest value (Figure 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor clonal strains isolated from the same patients at different days, there was a positive trend, but no significant correlation, between the number of private SNPs and time-span between isolations (r = 0.46, p-value = 0.14).
“For clonal strains isolated from the same patients at different days, we observed a positive trend, but no significant correlation, between the number of private SNPs and time-span between isolations (r = 0.46, p-value = 0.14) (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost (161) genes with non-synonymous mutations in matched pairs also present mis-sense variants in comparisons of non-clonal strains from the same clade, while only 23 were exclusive to comparisons among clonal isolates.
“These comparisons revealed that most (161) genes with non-synonymous mutations also present mis-sense variants in comparisons of non-clonal strains from the same clade, while only 23 were exclusive to comparisons among clonal isolates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataWith the exception of the pair NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, the rest of the clonal strains present additionally two non-synonymous mutations (S76P and T143P) in PDR1.
“Also, with the exception of the pair NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, the rest of the clonal strains present additionally two non-synonymous mutations (S76P and T143P).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCANGA2A and CANGA2B presented deletions in the MATalpha cassette (CAGL0B00242g and CAGL0B01243g) and a duplication in MATa (CAGL0E00341g).
“Among all analyzed samples, CANGA2A and CANGA2B presented deletions in the MATalpha cassette (CAGL0B00242g and CAGL0B01243g) and a duplication in MATa (CAGL0E00341g), which suggest these strains present an abnormal configuration of mating type MATa (triple a), as previously shown for other strains (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGenetic distance was also high between strain pairs isolated the same day but from different body sites and sometimes similar to those isolated from the same site at different days.
“Moreover, the genetic distance was also high between strain pairs isolated the same day but from different body sites and sometimes similar to those isolated from the same site at different days (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe detected 49 private exonic INDELs that differ between pairs of isolates, which globally affected 36 genes, of which 17 encoded cell wall associated proteins.
“Overall, we detect 49 private exonic INDELs that differ between pairs of isolates, which globally affected 36 genes, of which 17 encoded cell wall associated proteins (Supplementary Table S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMCA analysis provided consistent results with previously published clades, and suggested that all these new strains could be ascribed to several of the previously described clades.
“MCA analysis provided consistent results with previously published clades, and suggested that all these new strains could be ascribed to several of the previously described clades (Carreté et al., 2018): namely, pairs B1012M/B1012S and EB101M/BO101S belong to clade I; SAT strains to clade II; DSY562/DSY565 to clade III; P35_2/P35_3, CMRL1/CMRL2, and CANGA3A/CANGA3B strains belong to clade VI; NRZ-”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataCMRL4 presents one private mutation G143V in FEN1.
“Additionally, CMRL4 presents one private mutation in G143V (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDSY562 and DSY565 share an additional non-synonymous mutation A942T, and four other MSH2 non-synonymous mutations are distributed in three other strain pairs.
“We additionally found another non-synonymous mutation shared by these two strains (A942T), and four other MSH2 non-synonymous mutations distributed in three other strain pairs (Supplementary Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost tested conditions resulted in similar growth of the three clonal isolates, with the exception of oxidative (hydrogen peroxide) and acidic (pH2) stress conditions.
“Most tested conditions resulted in a similar growth of the three clonal isolates, with the exception of oxidative (hydrogen peroxide) and acidic (pH2) stress conditions (Figure 4A and Supplementary Table S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn our dataset, three different non-synonymous mutations were shared in three different pairs of isolates: V62I in CMRL1/CMRL2, E142K in NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, and M155T in SAT strains.
“In our dataset, we observed three different non-synonymous mutations shared in three different pair of isolates: V62I in CMRL1/CMRL2, E142K in NRZ-2016-057/NRZ-2016-058, and M155T in SAT strains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNon-synonymous mutations in genes potentially related to drug resistance were common, sometimes, but not always, correlating with experimentally determined lower susceptibilities to drugs.
“We found that non-synonymous mutations in genes potentially related to drug resistance were common, sometimes, but not always, correlating with experimentally determined lower susceptibilities to drugs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSAT03BC and SAT02PL showed a faster growth rate as compared to the other isolates in the presence of hydrogen peroxide or low pH (pH = 2), respectively.
“SAT03BC and SAT02PL showed a faster growth rate as compared to the other isolates in the presence of hydrogen peroxide or low pH (pH = 2), respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGenetically diverse C. glabrata lineages can recombine, leading to genetic admixture.
“Another ability of C. glabrata that has been confirmed recently, using comparison of whole genome sequences, is that genetically diverse lineages can recombine, leading to genetic admixture (Dodgson et al., 2005; Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn C. albicans genome studies, serial isolates allowed the identification of alterations that may have contributed to drug resistance over the treatment course, including segmental aneuploidies, loss of heterozygosity, and gene-level alterations.
“In genome studies of the other major yeast pathogen, C. albicans, serial isolates allowed the identification of several alterations that may have contributed to drug resistance over the treatment course, including segmental aneuploidies (Selmecki et al., 2006), loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in large parts of the chromosomes (Dunkel et al., 2008), and alterations at the gene level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. glabrata is a haploid organism and thus, with the exception of aneuploidies, loss of heterozygosity does not play a role.
“These include the fact that C. glabrata is a haploid organism and thus, with the exception of aneuploidies, LOH does not play a role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gabaldón and Carreté, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere exists significant variation within C. albicans samples, suggesting that selection to become more resistant to drugs can shape the genetic variation of infecting populations.
“Despite the usually clonal nature of clinical isolates obtained from the same patient, it is known that there exist significant variation within C. albicans samples, suggesting that selection to become more resistant to drugs can shape the genetic variation of infecting populations (Ford et al., 2015; Hirakawa et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. glabrata presents different infection strategies and antifungal properties as compared to C. albicans.
“In addition, C. glabrata presents different infection strategies and antifungal properties as compared to C. albicans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gabaldón and Carreté, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGenetic variation and the presence of non-synonymous mutations and copy number variations accumulated within the host.
“Genetic variation and the presence of non-synonymous mutations and copy number variations accumulated within the host, suggest that clonal populations entail a non-negligible level of genetic variation that may reflect selection processes that occur within the human body.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe C. glabrata genome harbors several members of a specific gene family encoding epithelial adhesin proteins (EPA genes), which are considered a key factor in its ability to infect humans.
“The C. glabrata genome harbors several members of a specific gene family encoding epithelial adhesin proteins (EPA genes), which are considered a key factor in its ability to infect humans (Cormack and Falkow, 1999; Roetzer et al., 2011; Gabaldón et al., 2013; Vale-Silva et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThese C. albicans studies could not differentiate between mutations that occurred during the course of infection or selection over pre-existing standing variation.
“However, these studies could not differentiate between mutations that occurred during the course of infection or selection over pre-existing standing variation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. glabrata isolates can be ascribed to at least seven genetically distinct clades that lack a geographical structure.
“In a recent study, we have shown that C. glabrata isolates can be ascribed to at least seven genetically distinct clades that lack a geographical structure (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe aberrant mating type configuration of CANGA2A/CANGA2B was not reported in a previous analysis of these strains.
“The aberrant mating type configuration of CANGA2A/CANGA2B was not reported in a previous analysis of these strains (Håvelsrud and Gaustad, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Håvelsrud and Gaustad, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFKS1 and FKS2 mutations can confer resistance to echinocandin drugs in C. glabrata.
“it is known that FKS1 and FKS2 mutations can confer resistance to echinocandin drugs in C. glabrata (Katiyar et al., 2012; Arendrup and Perlin, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Katiyar et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Arendrup and Perlin, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationC. glabrata is likely able to undergo mating and introgression from differentiated strains.
“Importantly, this study also revealed that C. glabrata is likely able to undergo mating and introgression from differentiated strains (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationL280F in PDR1 is known to mediate azole resistance in C. glabrata.
“which is known to mediate azole resistance in C. glabrata (Ferrari et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferrari et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe finding that two deletions appear only in the first isolate corroborates that many of the differences between strains may represent standing variation, as gene deletions cannot be reversed.
“Two of the deletions appear only in the first isolate, which corroborates the previously mentioned finding that many of the differences between strains may represent standing variation, as gene deletions cannot be reversed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningGenomes from a total of 25 isolates corresponding to twelve different patients were analyzed in a common analytical framework to avoid analytical biases.
“Including the SAT strains, genomes from a total of 25 isolates corresponding to twelve different patients (Table 1) were analyzed in a common analytical framework to avoid analytical biases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationClosely related strains belonging to the same clade can have large phenotypic differences.
“Recent studies have shown that closely related strains belonging to the same clade can have large phenotypic differences (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe three SAT strains were sequenced using Illumina paired-end technology to an average coverage ranging from 463 to 575×.
“The three strains were sequenced using Illumina paired-end technology to an average coverage ranging from 463 to 575×.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost recent analyses of C. glabrata isolates obtained from the same patient revealed very little genetic variation, supporting the idea that a single clonal population colonizes different body sites and jointly contributes to infection.
“Most of these analyses revealed very little genetic variation, supporting the idea that a single clonal population colonizes different body sites and jointly contributes to infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe coordinates S629P and S663P belong to hot spot regions in FKS1 and FKS2 in which mutations can confer elevated MICs.
“These coordinates belong to hot spot regions in these two genes in which mutations can confer elevated MICs (Arendrup and Perlin, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Arendrup and Perlin, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationC. glabrata can undergo genomic re-arrangements as an adaptive survival mechanism.
“Previous studies found that C. glabrata can undergo genomic re-arrangements as an adaptive survival mechanism (Shin et al., 2007; Muller et al., 2009; Poláková et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPreviously a MATa to MATalpha switching event has been described for the P35_2/P35_3 pair.
“Previously a MATa to MATalpha switching event has been described already for the P35_2/P35_3 pair (Lin et al., 2007; Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationAssuming a per base mutation rate similar to that of haploid yeasts (0.33 10-9 per base per generation), each generation one would expect 0.0041 mutations in the genome.
“If we were to assume a per base mutation rate similar to that of haploid yeasts (estimated at 0.33 10-9 per base per generation) (Lynch et al., 2008), each generation one would expect 0.0041 mutations in the genome (0.33 10-9 × 12,3 106 bases in the genome = 4.1 10-3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lynch et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The per base mutation rate of C. glabrata is similar to that of haploid yeasts, estimated at 0.33 10-9 per base per generation.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe genetic structure of C. glabrata populations suggests that humans may not be the natural niche for this yeast.
“Moreover, the genetic structure of C. glabrata populations suggest that human may not be the natural niche for this yeast (Carreté et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carreté et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAssuming a doubling time close to 1 h in S. cerevisiae, the strains are separated by 374-474 days, or diverged 187-237 days ago.
“Further assuming a doubling time close to 1 h in S. cerevisiae, these would suggest that these strains are separated by 374–474 days (or that they diverged 187–237 days ago).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The doubling time of C. glabrata is close to 1 h, as in S. cerevisiae.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAberrant mating type switching events resulting in unorthodox configurations of the mating type loci are common among C. glabrata clinical isolates.
“Aberrant mating type switching events resulting in unorthodox configurations of the mating type loci have been shown to be common among C. glabrata clinical isolates (Brockert et al., 2003; Carreté et al., 2018)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDSY562 and DSY565 both carry a V239L mutation in MSH2 and may display a faster evolutionary rate.
“In a previous analysis it was reported that DSY562 and DSY565 both carry a V239L mutation in MSH2 and that these strains may display a faster evolutionary rate (Vale-Silva et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vale-Silva et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTwo or three isolates per patient represent a very poor sampling of the infecting population, and the results should be confirmed with larger datasets.
“Admittedly, two or three isolates per patient represent a very poor sampling of the infecting population and our results should be confirmed with larger datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSIR3 and SIR4 from several clinical isolates present a larger number of non-synonymous polymorphisms as compared to genes encoding other silencing proteins, and some such polymorphisms relate to different levels of silencing of target genes.
“A recent study (Leiva-Peláez et al., 2018) has found that SIR3 and SIR4 from several clinical isolates present a larger number of non-synonymous polymorphisms as compared to genes encoding other silencing proteins, and that some such polymorphisms relate to different levels of silencing of target genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leiva-Peláez et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMutations in FEN1 have been related to acquisition of resistance to echinocandins in C. glabrata, with some mutations leading to reduced susceptibility to caspofungin but not to micafungin.
“Mutations in the FEN1 gene have been related to acquisition of resistance to echinocandins in C. glabrata, with some mutations leading to reduced susceptibility to caspofungin but not to micafungin (Healey et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Healey et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSIR4 is a protein involved in subtelomeric silencing and regulation of biofilm formation.
“a protein involved in subtelomeric silencing and regulation of biofilm formation (Iraqui et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Iraqui et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningWith the current sampling and the lack of knowledge on the mutation rate and generation time of C. glabrata, it is impossible to know whether the high genetic variability predated the infectious phase and represents genetic variability existing in a commensal population, or whether most observed genetic differences appeared during the course of infection.
“With the current sampling and the lack of knowledge on the mutation rate and generation time of C. glabrata it is impossible to know whether this high genetic variability predated the infectious phase and represents genetic variability existing in a commensal population, or, alternatively, whether most of the observed genetic differences appeared during the course of infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA large standing variation would be compatible with the infecting strains originating from an established commensal population rather than from a recent infection with few infecting cells.
“Similarly, a large standing variation would also be compatible with the infecting strains originating from an established commensal population rather than from a recent infection with few infecting cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningGenes encoding cell-wall proteins may be more mutagenic, given their subtelomeric localization and the presence of repeats.
“Alternatively, genes encoding cell-wall proteins may be more mutagenic, given their subtelomeric localization and the presence of repeats.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMutations in MSH2, a mismatch repair gene, can influence the capacity to acquire resistance to drugs.
“Additionally, it has been suggested that mutations in MSH2, a mismatch repair gene, can influence the capacity to acquire resistance to drugs (Healey et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Healey et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese estimates seem to suggest that the divergence of the strains is larger than the period between isolations, reinforcing the conclusion that many mutations observed between any pair of serial isolates represent standing variation.
“Nevertheless these estimates seem to suggest that the divergence of the strains is larger than the period between isolations, reinforcing our conclusions that many of the mutations observed between any pair of serial isolates represent standing variation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
We lack a comprehensive understanding of how antifungal resistance or other adaptive processes develop during the course of an infection.
“Development of antifungal resistance during treatment is another possible cause of treatment failure, but we lack a comprehensive understanding of how this or other adaptive processes develop during the course of an infection.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is very little information on the existing genetic diversity in pathogen populations infecting the same patient.
“Similarly, there is very little information on what is the existing genetic diversity in pathogen populations infecting the same patient.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is unknown whether recombination can occur in the course of human infection or commensalism.
“Although such studies show evidence for relatively recent recombination (i.e., unique to one or few isolates within a clade), it is unknown whether this recombination can occur in the course of human infection or commensalism.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The three strains represent subsequent isolates of an evolving clone.
“Assuming the three strains represent subsequent isolates of an evolving clone, this would imply a very high number of reversions, something we consider unlikely.”
The paper relies on this without support.
This is the first trio of fully sequenced C. glabrata serial isolates.
“This represents the first trio of fully sequenced C. glabrata serial isolates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The differences between sequential isolates likely originated within the patient.
“We subsequently focused on detecting only those SNPs that differed between sequential isolates of the same pair or trio, as these had likely originated within the patient.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The per base mutation rate of C. glabrata is similar to that of haploid yeasts, estimated at 0.33 10-9 per base per generation.
“If we were to assume a per base mutation rate similar to that of haploid yeasts (estimated at 0.33 10-9 per base per generation) (Lynch et al., 2008)”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The doubling time of C. glabrata is close to 1 h, as in S. cerevisiae.
“Further assuming a doubling time close to 1 h in S. cerevisiae”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Each sampled strain has been in the patient for some time.
“it can be assumed that each sampled strain has been in the patient for some time”
The paper relies on this without support.
Candida infections are difficult to clear, particularly in immunocompromised persons, so continuous infection in hospitalized patients is the most plausible scenario.
“(ii) Candida infections are difficult to clear, particularly in immunocompromised persons, suggesting continuous infection in hospitalized patients is the most plausible scenario;”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Most cases represent continuous infection.
“a safe assumption is that most cases represent continuous infection”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cell wall-encoding genes are highly variable and are probably unrelated to the petite phenotype.
“Cell wall-encoding genes are known to be highly variable and are probably unrelated to the petite phenotype (20, 21).”
From Overlooked <i>Candida glabrata</i> petites are echinocandin tolerant, induce host inflammatory responses, and display poor <i>in vivo</i> fitness (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
The Results (Genetic Variation in Serial Clinical Isolates; page not provided) report an enrichment of mutations in cell-wall genes, supporting their high variability. The Discussion (page not provided) also discusses this variation, but the passages do not address whether those genes are related to the petite phenotype. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
SAT02PL sampling site changes from peritoneal to pleural
MinorThe text says SAT02PL was sampled from the pleural cavity, but Table 1 identifies its site as peritoneal fluid.
“since pleural cavity (from which SAT02PL was sampled) is adjacent from the lungs”
“| SAT02PL | EF54001Per | Patient 10 | 1 | Peritoneal fluid | France | 55 | Leukemia | This project |”
P35 isolate identifier disagrees with Table 1
MinorThe results repeatedly refer to a P35_2/P35_3 pair, whereas Table 1 lists the patient's two isolates as P35_1 and P35_2.
“P35_2/P35_3, CMRL1/CMRL2, and CANGA3A/CANGA3B strains belong to clade VI”
“| P35_1 | | Patient 9 | 0 | Oral | Taiwan | 136 | HIV positive | Lin et al., 2007 | | P35_2 | | Patient 9 | 90 | Oral | Taiwan | 136 | HIV positive | Lin et al., 2007 |”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Carreté, L., Ksiezopolska, E., Gómez-Molero, E., Angoulvant, A., Bader, O., Fairhead, C., & Gabaldón, T.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Gabaldón, Toni
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-02-12
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 112-112
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6379656
- OpenAlex
- W2913641029
- Semantic Scholar
- 2a69ab21724beddc9498c917b9f30c1c1f79ac68
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España (BFU2015-67107)
- European Research Council (ERC-2016-724173)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2014-642095)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Keywords
- Candida glabrata, candidiasis, clonal populations, genetic variation, non-synonymous mutations, copy number variation, cell wall proteins, genome plasticity, host adaptation, opportunistic fungal pathogens, drug resistance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review