The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Staphylococcus aureus Throat Colonization Is More Frequent than Colonization in the Anterior Nares
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and persistence of Staphylococcus aureus carriage in the throat in relation to anterior naris carriage. By use of a sensitive enrichment broth, S. aureus was cultured from the two sites from 259 patients upon admission to an orthopedic ward and from 87 staff members of the same ward. The throat was the most common carriage site in both groups. Forty percent of the patients and 54% of the staff were positive for S. aureus in the throat, compared to 31% and 36%, respectively, in the anterior nares. To determine the persistence of carriage, 67 individuals were repeatedly sampled from the anterior nares and the throat over 2 years (5 to 10 sampling occasions; mean, 7.8). The majority, 58% (39/67), were defined as persistent carriers of S. aureus , considering culture results from both sites. Of the 39 persistent carriers, 15 individuals were culture positive from only the throat on more than half of the sampling occasions (these are called preferential throat carriers) while only 5% (two individuals) were preferential anterior naris carriers by use of the same definition. Typing of the collected S. aureus isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed that the same strain of S. aureus was present, over time, in the throat of an individual at least to the same extent as in the anterior nares. Throat carriage was at least as persistent as carriage in the anterior nares.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A notable study by Nilsson and Ripa) demonstrated that the rate of throat carriage among patients significantly exceeded that of nasal carriage, showing figures of 40% versus 31% [56].”
From Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial adherence to pharyngeal cells during viral infection.
Fainstein, V., Musher, D. M., & Cate, T. R. (1980) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/141.2.172 · Cited by 177
Cited by
David, M. Z., & Daum, R. S. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00081-09 · Cited by 1,972
Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms
Touaitia, R., Mairi, A., Ibrahim, N. A., Basher, N. S., Idres, T., & Touati, A. (2025) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14050470 · Cited by 273
DE LASTOURS, V., MALOSH, R., RAMADUGU, K., SRINIVASAN, U., DAWID, S., OHMIT, S., & FOXMAN, B. (2016) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268816001473 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Nilsson, P., & Ripa, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3334-3339
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2006741690
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staphylococcus aureus Throat Colonization Is More Frequent than Colonization in the Anterior Nares. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.00880-06
- The paper
- Nilsson, P., & Ripa, T. (2006). Staphylococcus aureus Throat Colonization Is More Frequent than Colonization in the Anterior Nares. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00880-06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.