Global Proficiency Study of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping
Open accessAbstract
Internationally comparable quality assurance of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection and typing methods is essential for evaluation of HPV vaccines and effective monitoring and implementation of HPV vaccination programs. Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) HPV Laboratory Network (LabNet) designed an international proficiency study. Following announcement at the WHO website, the responding laboratories performed HPV typing using one or more of their usual assays on 43 coded samples composed of titration series of purified plasmids of 16 HPV types (HPV6, -11, -16, -18, -31, -33, -35, -39, -45, -51, -52, -56, -58, -59, -66, and -68). Detection of at least 50 IU of HPV16 or HPV18 DNA and of 500 genome equivalents (GE) of the other 14 HPV types (in samples with single and multiple HPV types) was considered proficient. Fifty-four laboratories worldwide submitted a total of 84 data sets. More than 21 HPV-genotyping assays were used. Commonly used methods were Linear Array, Lineblot, InnoLiPa, Clinical Array, type-specific real-time PCR, PCR-Luminex and microarray assays. The major oncogenic HPV types (HPV16 and -18) were detected in 89.7% (70/78) and 92.2% (71/77) of the data sets, respectively. HPV types 56, 59, and 68 were the least commonly detected types (in less than 80% of the data sets). Twenty-eight data sets reported multiple false-positive results and were considered nonproficient. In conclusion, we found that international proficiency studies, traceable to international standards, allow standardized quality assurance for different HPV-typing assays and enable the comparison of data generated from different laboratories worldwide.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PG was not proficient only for HPV68a, which cannot be efficiently detected with the PGMY primers.
“PG was not proficient only for HPV68a, which cannot be efficiently detected with the PGMY primers (23).”
From Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 with the PGMY-CHUV Assay for Human Papillomavirus Genotyping (2014) · cites this paper as [23]
The Discussion reports that PGMY-based assays could not detect the HPV68a plasmid because HPV68a differs at the PGMY primer-binding site. It does not establish that the assay called “PG” was proficient for every type except HPV68a; its proficiency tables report results by assay category, not that specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe higher HPV68 detection by H28 is a known consequence of the inability of the PGMY primers to efficiently target the HPV68a subtype.
“The latter is a known consequence of the inability of the PGMY primers to efficiently target the HPV68a subtype (23).”
From Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 with the PGMY-CHUV Assay for Human Papillomavirus Genotyping (2014) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- [1]Bernard, H. U., S. Y. Chan, M. M. Manos, C. K. Ong, L. L. Villa, H. Delius, C. L. Peyton, H. M. Bauer, and C. M. Wheeler. 1994. Identification and assessment of known and novel human papillomaviruses by polymerase chain reaction amplification, restriction fragment length polymorphisms, nucleotide sequence, and phylogenetic algorithms. J. Infect. Dis. 170:1077-1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2]Bosch, F. X., A. Lorincz, N. Munoz, C. J. Meijer, and K. V. Shah. 2002. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J. Clin. Pathol. 55:244-265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3]Chouhy, D., L. B. Gil, A. L. Nocito, D. Wojdyla, L. Ornella, J. Cittadini, D. Gardiol, and A. A. Giri. 2006. Development and evaluation of a colorimetric PCR system for the detection and typing of human papillomaviruses. Int. J. Mol. Med. 18:995-1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4]Coutlée, F., D. Rouleau, G. Ghattas, C. Hankins, S. Vezina, P. Cote, J. Macleod, A. de Pokomandy, D. Money, S. Walmsley, H. Voyer, P. Brassard, and E. Franco. 2007. Confirmatory real-time PCR assay for human papillomavirus (HPV) type 52 infection in anogenital specimens screened for HPV infection with the linear array HPV genotyping test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:3821-3823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5]Ferguson, M., D. E. Wilkinson, and T. Zhou. 2009. WHO meeting on the standardization of HPV assays and the role of the WHO HPV Laboratory Network in supporting vaccine introduction held on 24-25 January 2008, Geneva, Switzerland. Vaccine 27:337-347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6]Gheit, T., S. Landi, F. Gemignani, P. J. Snijders, S. Vaccarella, S. Franceschi, F. Canzian, and M. Tommasino. 2006. Development of a sensitive and specific assay combining multiplex PCR and DNA microarray primer extension to detect high-risk mucosal human papillomavirus types. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:2025-2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7]Gravitt, P. E., C. L. Peyton, R. J. Apple, and C. M. Wheeler. 1998. Genotyping of 27 human papillomavirus types by using L1 consensus PCR products by a single-hybridization, reverse line blot detection method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3020-3027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8]Jacobs, M. V., A. M. de Roda Husman, A. J. van den Brule, P. J. Snijders, C. J. Meijer, and J. M. Walboomers. 1995. Group-specific differentiation between high- and low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes by general primer-mediated PCR and two cocktails of oligonucleotide probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:901-905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9]Kleter, B., L. J. van Doorn, L. Schrauwen, A. Molijn, S. Sastrowijoto, J. ter Schegget, J. Lindeman, B. ter Harmsel, M. Burger, and W. Quint. 1999. Development and clinical evaluation of a highly sensitive PCR-reverse hybridization line probe assay for detection and identification of anogenital human papillomavirus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2508-2517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10]Klug, S. J., A. Molijn, B. Schopp, B. Holz, A. Iftner, W. Quint, J. F. P. Snijders, K. U. Petry, S. Kruger Kjaer, C. Munk, and T. Iftner. 2008. Comparison of the performance of different HPV genotyping methods for detecting genital HPV types. J. Med. Virol. 80:1264-1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11]Longuet, M., S. Beaudenon, and G. Orth. 1996. Two novel genital human papillomavirus (HPV) types, HPV68 and HPV70, related to the potentially oncogenic HPV39. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:738-744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12]Meijer, C. J., J. Berkhof, P. E. Castle, A. T. Hesselink, E. L. Franco, G. Ronco, M. Arbyn, F. X. Bosch, J. Cuzick, J. Dillner, D. A. Heideman, and P. J. Snijders. 2009. Guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for primary cervical cancer screening in women 30 years and older. Int. J. Cancer 124:516-520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13]Quint, W. G., S. R. Pagliusi, N. Lelie, E. M. de Villiers, and C. M. Wheeler. 2006. Results of the first World Health Organization international collaborative study of detection of human papillomavirus DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:571-579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14]Reuter, S., H. Delius, T. Kahn, B. Hofmann, H. zur Hausen, and E. Schwarz. 1991. Characterization of a novel human papillomavirus DNA in the cervical carcinoma cell line ME180. J. Virol. 65:5564-5568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15]Schloss, L., A. M. van Loon, P. Cinque, G. Cleator, J. M. Echevarria, K. I. Falk, P. Klapper, J. Schirm, B. F. Vestergaard, H. Niesters, T. Popow-Kraupp, W. Quint, and A. Linde. 2003. An international external quality assessment of nucleic acid amplification of herpes simplex virus. J. Clin. Virol. 28:175-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16]Schmitt, M., I. G. Bravo, P. J. Snijders, L. Gissmann, M. Pawlita, and T. Waterboer. 2006. Bead-based multiplex genotyping of human papillomaviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:504-512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17]Schmitt, M., B. Dondog, T. Waterboer, and M. Pawlita. 2008. Homogeneous amplification of genital human alpha papillomaviruses by PCR using novel broad-spectrum GP5+ and GP6+ primers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:1050-1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18]Schuurman, R., D. Brambilla, T. de Groot, D. Huang, S. Land, J. Bremer, I. Benders, and C. A. Boucher. 2002. Underestimation of HIV type 1 drug resistance mutations: results from the ENVA-2 genotyping proficiency program. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 18:243-248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19]Smith, J. S., L. Lindsay, B. Hoots, J. Keys, S. Franceschi, R. Winer, and G. M. Clifford. 2007. Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: a meta-analysis update. Int. J. Cancer 121:621-632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20]Snijders, P. J., C. J. Hogewoning, A. T. Hesselink, J. Berkhof, F. J. Voorhorst, M. C. Bleeker, and C. J. Meijer. 2006. Determination of viral load thresholds in cervical scrapings to rule out CIN 3 in HPV 16, 18, 31 and 33-positive women with normal cytology. Int. J. Cancer 119:1102-1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21]Söderlund-Strand, A., J. Carlson, and J. Dillner. 2009. Modified general primer PCR system for sensitive detection of multiple types of oncogenic human papillomavirus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:541-546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22]Sotlar, K., D. Diemer, A. Dethleffs, Y. Hack, A. Stubner, N. Vollmer, S. Menton, M. Menton, K. Dietz, D. Wallwiener, R. Kandolf, and B. Bultmann. 2004. Detection and typing of human papillomavirus by e6 nested multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3176-3184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23]Stevens, M. P., S. M. Garland, and S. N. Tabrizi. 2008. Development and validation of a real-time PCR assay specifically detecting human papillomavirus 52 using the Roche LightCycler 480 system. J. Virol. Methods 147:290-296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24]Valentine-Thon, E., A. M. van Loon, J. Schirm, J. Reid, P. E. Klapper, and G. M. Cleator. 2001. European proficiency testing program for molecular detection and quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4407-4412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25]van den Brule, A. J., R. Pol, N. Fransen-Daalmeijer, L. M. Schouls, C. J. Meijer, and P. J. Snijders. 2002. GP5+/6+ PCR followed by reverse line blot analysis enables rapid and high-throughput identification of human papillomavirus genotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:779-787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26]WHO. 2005. WHO technical workshop on the role of laboratory detection of human papillomavirus in global disease prevention and control. World Health Organization. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2006/WHO_IVB_06.04_eng.pdf.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
VALGENT: a protocol for clinical validation of human papillomavirus assays
Arbyn, M., Depuydt, C., Benoy, I., Bogers, J., Cuschieri, K., Schmitt, M., Pawlita, M., Geraets, D., Heard, I., Gheit, T., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Virology · doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2015.09.014 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 with the PGMY-CHUV Assay for Human Papillomavirus Genotyping
Estrade, C., & Sahli, R. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02749-13 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Assessment of the Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test within the VALGENT framework
Xu, L., Oštrbenk, A., Poljak, M., & Arbyn, M. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Virology · doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2017.12.001 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Bandeira, I. C., Comerlato, J., Bessel, M., Fernandes, B. V., Mota, G., Villa, L. L., de Souza, F. M. A., Pereira, G. F. M., & Wendland, E. M. (2024) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0305122 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Simultaneously, the WHO global reference laboratory offers, each year, the “Global HPV DNA Proficiency Study” to certify laboratories as proficient in the genotyping of the main HPV types [22].”
Method
- Authors
- Eklund, C., Zhou, T., & Dillner, J.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- ORCID
- Dillner, Joakim
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4147-4155
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- PMC
- PMC3020877
- OpenAlex
- W2119977447
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- World Health Organization
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
- Lunds Universitet
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
- University of Cape Town
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- human papillomavirus, HPV genotyping, quality assurance, laboratory proficiency, false positives
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Viral, Genotype, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Sensitivity and Specificity, Virology, World Health Organization, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review