Utility of digital images captured after 4 h of incubation on a microbiology laboratory automation system in guiding the work-up of subcultures from positive blood cultures
Open accessAbstract
Initial workup [e.g., identification (ID) and/or antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)] of bacterial growth on solid media traditionally occurs 16–24 h after sub-culturing of positive blood cultures (BC). Early ID and AST can be facilitated by reviewing digital images captured using a Microbiology Laboratory Automation (MLA) system. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of images captured at 4 h on the WASPLab MLA system for rapid bacterial ID and AST. Retrospective review of all positive BCs results between 1 January 2021 and 31 July 2022 was performed. WASPLab App data were extracted to determine the decision (e.g., perform ID and/or AST or re-incubate plates) made from the 4 h image. Culture results were extracted from the laboratory information system (LIS). A total of 6,845 BCs flagged positive during the study period. The 4 h images for 1,476 cultures (21.6%) were reviewed: 1,200 cultures were re-incubated due to insufficient growth and 276 cultures (4.0%) were sent for ID and/or AST. ID by mass spectrometry was in 100% agreement with that of the molecular BC identification panels. Overall categorical agreement between AST results from the 4 h and overnight growth was 98%. The 4 h images for the remaining 5,369 cultures (78.4%) were not available for review during the day shift. Implementing early reading times for BCs on MLA allows for rapid and accurate ID and AST results. However, optimization of the reading schedule to align with the laboratory’s operation schedule is key to realizing the full potential of early reading times. IMPORTANCE: In recent years, an increasing number of clinical microbiology laboratories have adopted laboratory automation for processing and incubation of specimens submitted for bacterial culture. At our institution, we implemented the Copan WASPLab in 2018 for all cultures, including positive blood cultures. Given that positive blood cultures start with a higher biomass of organisms, the first image capture was set up to occur after 4 h of incubation. In this study, we investigated the utility of this early 4 h image by capturing and calculating the percentage of useful actions taken based on growth identified on the image and the yield of both new identification by MALDI-TOF MS and valid and accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results. We found that while the 4-hour time point provided accurate, early identification and AST results, the overall yield was minimal. From a practical standpoint, this review prompted us to discontinue capture and review of this time point. While our staffing model is likely responsible for this low yield, we hope that our experience would help other laboratories decide how to implement WASPLab workflow for positive blood cultures. Thus, we believe that this information will be of interest to the readers of JCM.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Smart incubation shortens incubation times while maintaining accuracy and enabling faster identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.
“Smart incubation has been shown to shorten incubation times while maintaining accuracy and enabling faster identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results (10).”
From Improving turnaround times with artificial intelligence in microbiology (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mutters, N. T., Hodiamont, C. J., Jong, M. D. D., Overmeijer, H. P. J., Boogaard, M. V. D., & E.Visser, C. (2014) · Annals of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.3343/alm.2014.34.2.111 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- [1]Alhashem F, Tiren-Verbeet NL, Alp E, Doganay M. 2017. Treatment of sepsis: what is the antibiotic choice in bacteremia due to carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae? World J Clin Cases 5: 324– 332. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v5.i8.324 28868304 PMC5561501 · DOI
- [2]Loonen AJM, Jansz AR, Stalpers J, Wolffs PFG, van den Brule AJC. 2012. An evaluation of three processing methods and the effect of reduced culture times for faster direct identification of pathogens from BacT/ALERT blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31: 1575– 1583. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1480-y 22080416 PMC3364411 · DOI
- [3]Martiny D, Dediste A, Vandenberg O. 2012. Comparison of an in-house method and the commercial Sepsityper kit for bacterial identification directly from positive blood culture broths by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31: 2269– 2281. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1566-1 22367290 · DOI
- [4]Buchan BW, Riebe KM, Ledeboer NA. 2012. Comparison of the MALDI Biotyper system using Sepsityper specimen processing to routine microbiological methods for identification of bacteria from positive blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 50: 346– 352. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05021-11 22162549 PMC3264150 · DOI
- [5]Meex C, Neuville F, Descy J, Huynen P, Hayette M-P, De Mol P, Melin P. 2012. Direct identification of bacteria from BacT/ALERT anaerobic positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS: MALDI Sepsityper kit versus an in-house saponin method for bacterial extraction. J Med Microbiol 61: 1511– 1516. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.044750-0 22837218 · DOI
- [6]Chen JHK, Ho P-L, Kwan GSW, She KKK, Siu GKH, Cheng VCC, Yuen K-Y, Yam W-C. 2013. Direct bacterial identification in positive blood cultures by use of two commercial matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems. J Clin Microbiol 51: 1733– 1739. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03259-12 23515548 PMC3716069 · DOI
- [7]Verroken A, Defourny L, Lechgar L, Magnette A, Delmée M, Glupczynski Y. 2015. Reducing time to identification of positive blood cultures with MALDI-TOF MS analysis after a 5-h subculture. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34: 405– 413. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2242-4 25252627 · DOI
- [8]Cherkaoui A, Renzi G, Azam N, Schorderet D, Vuilleumier N, Schrenzel J. 2020. Rapid identification by MALDI-TOF/MS and antimicrobial disk diffusion susceptibility testing for positive blood cultures after a short incubation on the WASPLab. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 39: 1063– 1070. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03817-8 31965365 · DOI
- [9]Leber AL, Peterson E, Dien Bard J, Personnel S, ASfM WS. 2022. The hidden crisis in the times of COVID-19: critical shortages of medical laboratory professionals in clinical microbiology. J Clin Microbiol 60: e0024122. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00241-22 35658527 PMC9383190 · DOI
- [10]Ledeboer NA, Dallas SD. 2014. The automated clinical microbiology laboratory: fact or fantasy? J Clin Microbiol 52: 3140– 3146. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00686-14 24648549 PMC4313129 · DOI
- [12]Fitzgerald C, Stapleton P, Phelan E, Mulhare P, Carey B, Hickey M, Lynch B, Doyle M. 2016. Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS and a modification of the standardised disc diffusion test: a pilot study. J Clin Pathol: jclinpath-2015-203436. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203436 27122186 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving turnaround times with artificial intelligence in microbiology
Davidson, R., Heinstein, C., Patriquin, G., Goneau, L. W., Brown, L. A., & Hill, B. J. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00354-26 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cintrón, M., Clark, B., Miranda, E., & Babady, N. E.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Babady, N. Esther
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2025-02-19
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e0132024-e0132024
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- PMC
- PMC11837544
- OpenAlex
- W4405640267
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- blood culture, bacterial identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, culture yield, bacteremia, meningitis, urinary tract infection
- MeSH terms
- Blood Culture, Bacteria, Bacteriological Techniques, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Bacteremia, Automation, Laboratory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review