The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increased Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates from a University Hospital during a 5-Year Period
Open accessAbstract
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most commonly isolated organisms in nosocomial infections. While the prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) continues to increase worldwide, there is concern about an increase in vancomycin MICs among S. aureus strains. The prevalence of MRSA and vancomycin MIC trends in S. aureus from patients in a university hospital were analyzed. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, formerly NCCLS) reference broth microdilution MIC testing was performed on all clinically relevant S. aureus isolates from January 2000 through December 2004. A total of 6,003 S. aureus isolates were analyzed. No vancomycin-resistant S. aureus isolates were detected. One MRSA isolate had a vancomycin MIC of 8 μg/ml and was confirmed as vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus . Among the 6,002 remaining isolates, a shift in vancomycin MICs from ≤0.5 to 1.0 μg/ml was observed during the 5-year period. The percentage of S. aureus isolates with a vancomycin MIC of 1 μg/ml in 2004 was significantly higher than the percentage of isolates in 2000 (70.4% versus 19.9%; P < 0.01). This vancomycin MIC shift was more notable in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus . Our 5 years of routine testing of clinical isolates using the CLSI reference broth microdilution MIC method demonstrated a tendency toward decreasing susceptibility to vancomycin in S. aureus .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era
Chambers, H. F., & DeLeo, F. R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2200 · Cited by 2,718
David, M. Z., & Daum, R. S. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00081-09 · Cited by 1,972
Rybak, M., Lomaestro, B., Rotschafer, J. C., Moellering, R., Craig, W., Billeter, M., Dalovisio, J. R., & Levine, D. P. (2009) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp080434 · Cited by 1,795
Howden, B. P., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Stinear, T. P., & Grayson, M. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-09 · Cited by 962
Kullar, R., Davis, S. L., Levine, D. P., & Rybak, M. J. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir124 · Cited by 463
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, G., Hindler, J. F., Ward, K. W., & Bruckner, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3883-3886
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2056829631
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates from a University Hospital during a 5-Year Period. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.01388-06
- The paper
- Wang, G., Hindler, J. F., Ward, K. W., & Bruckner, D. A. (2006). Increased Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates from a University Hospital during a 5-Year Period. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01388-06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.