Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 26Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyMycobacterium research and diagnosisBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fast, Simple, and Cheap: the Kudoh-Ogawa Swab Method as an Alternative to the Petroff–Lowenstein-Jensen Method for Culturing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Open access
Franco-Sotomayor, Greta, Rivera-Olivero, Ismar A., Leon-Benitez, Margarita, Uruchima-Campoverde, Sandra E., Cardenas-Franco, Greta, Perdomo-Castro, Mercedes E., Cardenas-Franco, Camilo S., Ortega-Vivanco, Jackeline, Abad-Ruiz, Ana S., de Waard, Jacobus H., Garcia-Bereguiain, Miguel Angel·2020·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of the Kudoh-Ogawa (K-O) swab method for the culturing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from clinical samples with the standard Petroff–Lowenstein-Jensen (P-LJ) procedure. A total of 2,287 sputum samples and 685 extrapulmonary clinical specimens were processed with both decontamination methods and compared for M. tuberculosis detection rate, recovery of M. tuberculosis colonies, and culture contamination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.01424-19

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. WHO. 2018. Global tuberculosis report 2018. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Cited by

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Franco-Sotomayor, G., Rivera-Olivero, I. A., Leon-Benitez, M., Uruchima-Campoverde, S. E., Cardenas-Franco, G., Perdomo-Castro, M. E., Cardenas-Franco, C. S., Ortega-Vivanco, J., Abad-Ruiz, A. S., de Waard, J. H., & Garcia-Bereguiain, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil (EC)
  • Universidad de Las Américas (EC)
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública e Investigación Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez, Guayaquil, Ecuador
  • Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública (EC)
  • University of Guayaquil (EC)
  • One Health Research Group, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2020-03-25
Volume
58
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W3004440892
Cited by
26
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, mycobacterial culture, sputum, culture contamination, decontamination, tuberculosis diagnosis, diagnostic yield
MeSH terms
Bacteriological Techniques, Culture Media, Humans, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Specimen Handling, Sputum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.