Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progression to Active Tuberculosis, but Not Transmission, Varies by Mycobacterium tuberculosis Lineage in The Gambia

Open access
de Jong, Bouke C., Hill, Philip C., Aiken, Alex, Awine, Timothy, Antonio, Martin, Adetifa, Ifedayo M., Jackson‐Sillah, Dolly J., Fox, Annette, DeRiemer, Kathryn, Gagneux, Sebastien, Borgdorff, Martien W., McAdam, Keith P. W. J., Corrah, Tumani, Small, Peter M., Adegbola, Richard A.·2008·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is considerable variability in the outcome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. We hypothesized that Mycobacterium africanum was less likely than M. tuberculosis to transmit and progress to tuberculosis disease. METHODS: In a cohort study of patients with tuberculosis and their household contacts in The Gambia, we categorized 1808 HIV-negative tuberculosis contacts according to exposure to M. tuberculosis or M. africanum. Positive skin test results indicated transmission, and development of tuberculosis during 2 years of follow-up indicated progression to disease. RESULTS: Transmission rates were similar, but rates of progression to disease were significantly lower in contacts exposed to M. africanum than in those exposed to M. tuberculosis (1.0% vs. 2.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 3.1 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.1-8.7]). Within M. tuberculosis sensu stricto, contacts exposed to a Beijing family strain were most likely to progress to disease (5.6%; HR relative to M. africanum, 6.7 [95% CI, 2.0-22]). CONCLUSIONS: M. africanum and M. tuberculosis transmit equally well to household contacts, but contacts exposed to M. africanum are less likely to progress to tuberculosis disease than those exposed to M. tuberculosis. The variable rate of progression by lineage suggests that tuberculosis variability matters in clinical settings and should be accounted for in studies evaluating tuberculosis vaccines and treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/591504

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
de Jong, B. C., Hill, P. C., Aiken, A., Awine, T., Antonio, M., Adetifa, I. M., Jackson‐Sillah, D. J., Fox, A., DeRiemer, K., Gagneux, S., Borgdorff, M. W., McAdam, K. P. W. J., Corrah, T., Small, P. M., & Adegbola, R. A.
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-10
Volume
198
Issue
7
Pages
1037-1043
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2110949356
Cited by
289
References
1
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progression to Active Tuberculosis, but Not Transmission, Varies by Mycobacterium tuberculosis Lineage in The Gambia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/591504
The paper
de Jong, B. C., Hill, P. C., Aiken, A., Awine, T., Antonio, M., Adetifa, I. M., Jackson‐Sillah, D. J., Fox, A., DeRiemer, K., Gagneux, S., Borgdorff, M. W., McAdam, K. P. W. J., Corrah, T., Small, P. M., & Adegbola, R. A. (2008). Progression to Active Tuberculosis, but Not Transmission, Varies by Mycobacterium tuberculosis Lineage in The Gambia. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/591504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.