The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of Bloodstream Infections in Adults: How Many Blood Cultures Are Needed?
Open accessAbstract
Although several reports have shown that two to three 20-ml blood cultures are adequate for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia in adults, a recent study (F. R. Cockerill et al., Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1724-1730, 2004) found that two blood cultures detected only 80% of bloodstream infections and that three blood cultures detected 96% of episodes. We reviewed data at two university hospitals to determine whether the recent observations by Cockerill et al. are applicable more widely. We assessed all blood cultures obtained from adult inpatients from 1 January 2004 through 31 December 2005 at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital and Duke University Medical Center. All instances in which ≥3 blood cultures per patient were obtained during a 24-h period were included. The medical records of patients who met the inclusion criteria were reviewed retrospectively to determine the clinical significance of the positive blood culture (true infection versus contamination). Data were analyzed to determine the cumulative sensitivity of blood cultures obtained sequentially during the 24-h time period. Of 629 unimicrobial episodes with ≥3 blood cultures obtained during the 24-h period, 460 (73.1%) were detected with the first blood culture, 564 (89.7%) were detected with the first two blood cultures, 618 (98.2%) were detected with the first three blood cultures, and 628 (99.8%) were detected with the first four blood cultures. Of 351 unimicrobial episodes with ≥4 blood cultures obtained during the 24-h period, 257 (73.2%) were detected with the first blood culture, 308 (93.9%) were detected with the first two blood cultures, 340 (96.9%) were detected with the first three blood cultures, and 350 (99.7%) were detected with the first four blood cultures. Among unimicrobial episodes, Staphylococcus aureus was more likely to be detected with the first blood culture (approximately 90% detected with the first blood culture). There were 58 polymicrobial episodes in which ≥3 blood cultures were obtained. Forty-seven (81.0%) were detected with the first blood culture, 54 (93.1%) were detected with the first two blood cultures, and 58 (100%) were detected with the first three blood cultures. The results of this study indicate that two blood cultures in a 24-h period will detect approximately 90% of bloodstream infections in adults. To achieve a detection rate of >99%, as many as four blood cultures may be needed. The previously held axiom that virtually all bloodstream infections can be detected with two to three blood cultures may no longer be valid but may also depend on the definition of the “first” blood culture obtained (see Materials and Methods and Discussion in the text).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weinstein, M. P., Reller, L. B., Murphy, J. R., & Lichtenstein, K. A. (1983) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/5.1.35 · Cited by 751
Self-citationOptimal Testing Parameters for Blood Cultures
Cockerill, F. R., Wilson, J. W., Vetter, E. A., Goodman, K. M., Torgerson, C. A., Harmsen, W. S., Schleck, C. D., Ilstrup, D. M., Washington, J. A., & Wilson, W. R. (2004) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/421087 · Cited by 435
Weinstein, M. P. (1996) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/23.1.40 · Cited by 324
Self-citationBlood cultures: principles and techniques.
Washington, J. A. (1975) · PubMed · Cited by 204
Cited by
Freifeld, A. G., Bow, E. J., Sepkowitz, K. A., Boeckh, M. J., Ito, J. I., Mullen, C. A., Raad, I. I., Rolston, K. V., Young, J.-A. H., & Wingard, J. R. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir073 · Cited by 3,463
Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009)
Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and by the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for Infection and Cancer, Habib, G., Hoen, B., Tornos, P., Thuny, F., Prendergast, B., Vilacosta, I., Moreillon, P., de Jesus Antunes, M., Thilen, U., et al. (2009) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp285 · Cited by 2,014
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of endocarditis
Delgado, V., Ajmone Marsan, N., de Waha, S., Bonaros, N., Brida, M., Burri, H., Caselli, S., Doenst, T., Ederhy, S., Erba, P. A., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad193 · Cited by 1,754
Crump, J. A., Sjölund-Karlsson, M., Gordon, M. A., & Parry, C. M. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-15 · Cited by 1,156
Cahill, T. J., & Prendergast, B. D. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00067-7 · Cited by 991
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, A., Mirrett, S., Reller, L. B., & Weinstein, M. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3546-3548
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2138096026
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Bloodstream Infections in Adults: How Many Blood Cultures Are Needed? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.01555-07
- The paper
- Lee, A., Mirrett, S., Reller, L. B., & Weinstein, M. P. (2007). Detection of Bloodstream Infections in Adults: How Many Blood Cultures Are Needed? Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01555-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.