Cited by 29Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchReproductive tract infections researchWomen's cancer prevention and management

Validation of a Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Cervical Screening Test That Provides Expanded HPV Typing

Open access
Demarco, Maria, Carter-Pokras, Olivia, Hyun, Noorie, Castle, Philip E., He, Xin, Dallal, Cher M., Chen, Jie, Gage, Julia C. +7 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

As cervical cancer screening shifts from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, a major question is the clinical value of identifying individual HPV types. We aimed to validate Onclarity (Becton Dickinson Diagnostics, Sparks, MD), a nine-channel HPV test recently approved by the FDA, by assessing (i) the association of Onclarity types/channels with precancer/cancer; (ii) HPV type/channel agreement between the results of Onclarity and cobas (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA), another FDA-approved test; and (iii) Onclarity typing for all types/channels compared to typing results from a research assay (linear array [LA]; Roche). We compared Onclarity to histopathology, cobas, and LA. We tested a stratified random sample ( n = 9,701) of discarded routine clinical specimens that had tested positive by Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Qiagen, Germantown, MD). A subset had already been tested by cobas and LA ( n = 1,965). Cervical histopathology was ascertained from electronic health records. Hierarchical Onclarity channels showed a significant linear association with histological severity. Onclarity and cobas had excellent agreement on partial typing of HPV16, HPV18, and the other 12 types as a pool (sample-weighted kappa value of 0.83); cobas was slightly more sensitive for HPV18 and slightly less sensitive for the pooled high-risk types. Typing by Onclarity showed excellent agreement with types and groups of types identified by LA (kappa values from 0.80 for HPV39/68/35 to 0.97 for HPV16). Onclarity typing results corresponded well to histopathology and to an already validated HPV DNA test and could provide additional clinical typing if such discrimination is determined to be clinically desirable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.01910-17

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1]Schiffman M, Wentzensen N. 2013. Human papillomavirus infection and the multistage carcinogenesis of cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22:553–560. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [2]Anonymous. 2017. Draft recommendation statement. Cervical cancer: screening. US Preventive Services Task Force, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/draft-recommendation-statement/cervical-cancer-screening2. [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Snijders PJ, Heideman DA, Meijer CJ. 2010. Methods for HPV detection in exfoliated cell and tissue specimens. APMIS 118:520–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02621.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [4]Bosch FX, Broker TR, Forman D, Moscicki AB, Gillison ML, Doorbar J, Stern PL, Stanley M, Arbyn M, Poljak M, Cuzick J, Castle PE, Schiller JT, Markowitz LE, Fisher WA, Canfell K, Denny LA, Franco EL, Steben M, Kane MA, Schiffman M, Meijer CJ, Sankaranarayanan R, Castellsague X, Kim JJ, Brotons M, Alemany L, Albero G, Diaz M, de Sanjose S. 2013. Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases. Vaccine 31(Suppl 6):G1–G31. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [5]Poljak M, Kocjan BJ. 2010. Commercially available assays for multiplex detection of alpha human papillomaviruses. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 8:1139–1162. doi: 10.1586/eri.10.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [6]Schiffman M, Hyun N, Raine-Bennett TR, Katki H, Fetterman B, Gage JC, Cheung LC, Befano B, Poitras N, Lorey T, Castle PE, Wentzensen N. 2016. A cohort study of cervical screening using partial HPV typing and cytology triage. Int J Cancer 139:2606–2615. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [7]Halec G, Alemany L, Lloveras B, Schmitt M, Alejo M, Bosch FX, Tous S, Klaustermeier JE, Guimera N, Grabe N, Lahrmann B, Gissmann L, Quint W, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Pawlita M. 2014. Pathogenic role of the eight probably/possibly carcinogenic HPV types 26, 53, 66, 67, 68, 70, 73 and 82 in cervical cancer. J Pathol 234:441–451. doi: 10.1002/path.4405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [8]Castle PE, Solomon D, Wheeler CM, Gravitt PE, Wacholder S, Schiffman M. 2008. Human papillomavirus genotype specificity of hybrid capture 2. J Clin Microbiol 46:2595–2604. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00824-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [9]Castle PE, Wheeler CM, Solomon D, Schiffman M, Peyton CL, ALTS Group. 2004. Interlaboratory reliability of Hybrid Capture 2. Am J Clin Pathol 122:238–245. doi: 10.1309/BA43HMCAJ26VWQH3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [10]Chen W, Jeronimo J, Zhao FH, Qiao YL, Valdez M, Zhang X, Kang LN, Bansil P, Paul P, Bai P, Peck R, Li J, Chen F, Stoler MH, Castle PE. 2014. The concordance of HPV DNA detection by Hybrid Capture 2 and careHPV on clinician- and self-collected specimens. J Clin Virol 61:553–557. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [11]Castle PE, Schiffman M, Burk RD, Wacholder S, Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Bratti MC, Sherman ME, Lorincz A. 2002. Restricted cross-reactivity of hybrid capture 2 with nononcogenic human papillomavirus types. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1394–1399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. [12]Gage JC, Sadorra M, Lamere BJ, Kail R, Aldrich C, Kinney W, Fetterman B, Lorey T, Schiffman M, Castle PE, PaP Cohort Study Group. 2012. Comparison of the cobas human papillomavirus (HPV) test with the hybrid capture 2 and linear array HPV DNA tests. J Clin Microbiol 50:61–65. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05989-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [13]Schiffman M, Boyle S, Raine-Bennett T, Katki HA, Gage JC, Wentzensen N, Kornegay JR, Apple R, Aldrich C, Erlich HA, Tam T, Befano B, Burk RD, Castle PE. 2015. The role of human papillomavirus genotyping in cervical cancer screening: a large-scale evaluation of the cobas HPV test. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24:1304–1310. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [14]Wright TC Jr, Stoler MH, Agreda PM, Beitman GH, Gutierrez EC, Harris JM, Koch KR, Kuebler M, LaViers WD, Legendre BL Jr, Leitch SV, Maus CE, McMillian RA, Nussbaumer WA, Palmer ML, Porter MJ, Richart GA, Schwab RJ, Vaughan LM. 2014. Clinical performance of the BD Onclarity HPV assay using an adjudicated cohort of BD SurePath liquid-based cytology specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 142:43–50. doi: 10.1309/AJCP53KMHNRDICBL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [15]Schiffman M, Vaughan LM, Raine-Bennett TR, Castle PE, Katki HA, Gage JC, Fetterman B, Befano B, Wentzensen N. 2015. A study of HPV typing for the management of HPV-positive ASC-US cervical cytologic results. Gynecol Oncol 138:573–578. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [16]Lam JUH, Rebolj M, Ejegod DM, Pedersen H, Rygaard C, Lynge E, Harder E, Thomsen LT, Kjaer SK, Bonde J. 19 July 2017. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in self-taken samples from screening nonattenders. J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/jcm.00550-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [17]Ejegod D, Bottari F, Pedersen H, Sandri MT, Bonde J. 2016. The BD Onclarity HPV assay on samples collected in SurePath medium meets the international guidelines for human papillomavirus test requirements for cervical screening. J Clin Microbiol 54:2267–2272. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00508-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [18]Cuzick J, Ahmad AS, Austin J, Cadman L, Ho L, Terry G, Kleeman M, Ashdown-Barr L, Lyons D, Stoler M, Szarewski A. 2016. A comparison of different human papillomavirus tests in PreservCyt versus SurePath in a referral population—PREDICTORS 4. J Clin Virol 82:145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [19]Cuschieri K, Geraets DT, Moore C, Quint W, Duvall E, Arbyn M. 2015. Clinical and analytical performance of the Onclarity HPV assay using the VALGENT framework. J Clin Microbiol 53:3272–3279. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01366-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [20]Castro FA, Koshiol J, Quint W, Wheeler CM, Gillison ML, Vaughan LM, Kleter B, van Doorn L-J, Chaturvedi AK, Hildesheim A, Schiffman M, Wang SS, Zuna RE, Walker JL, Dunn ST, Wentzensen N. 2015. Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods. BMC Infect Dis 15:544. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1281-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [21]Bottari F, Sideri M, Gulmini C, Igidbashian S, Tricca A, Casadio C, Carinelli S, Boveri S, Ejegod D, Bonde J, Sandri MT. 2015. Comparison of Onclarity human papillomavirus (HPV) assay with Hybrid Capture II HPV DNA assay for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3 lesions. J Clin Microbiol 53:2109–2114. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00246-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [23]Gage JC, Schiffman M, Katki HA, Castle PE, Fetterman B, Wentzensen N, Poitras NE, Lorey T, Cheung LC, Kinney WK. 2014. Reassurance against future risk of precancer and cancer conferred by a negative human papillomavirus test. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju153. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [24]Schiffman M, Glass AG, Wentzensen N, Rush BB, Castle PE, Scott DR, Buckland J, Sherman ME, Rydzak G, Kirk P, Lorincz AT, Wacholder S, Burk RD. 2011. A long-term prospective study of type-specific human papillomavirus infection and risk of cervical neoplasia among 20,000 women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20:1398–1409. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [25]Castle PE, Shaber R, LaMere BJ, Kinney W, Fetterma B, Poitras N, Lorey T, Schiffman M, Dunne A, Ostolaza JM, McKinney S, Burk RD. 2011. Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in women with cervical precancer and cancer at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20:946–953. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [26]Castle PE, Kinney WK, Cheung LC, Gage JC, Fetterman B, Poitras NE, Lorey TS, Wentzensen N, Befano B, Schussler J, Katki HA, Schiffman M. 10 June 2017. Why does cervical cancer occur in a state-of-the-art screening program? Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [27]Szarewski A, Mesher D, Cadman L, Austin J, Ashdown-Barr L, Ho L, Terry G, Liddle S, Young M, Stoler M, McCarthy J, Wright C, Bergeron C, Soutter WP, Lyons D, Cuzick J. 2012. Comparison of seven tests for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with abnormal smears: the Predictors 2 study. J Clin Microbiol 50:1867–1873. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00181-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [28]Gage JC, Duggan MA, Nation JG, Gao S, Castle PE. 2010. Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:481.e1–481.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [29]Gage JC, Duggan MA, Nation JG, Gao S, Castle PE. 2013. Comparative risk of high-grade histopathology diagnosis after a CIN 1 finding in endocervical curettage versus cervical biopsy. J Low Genit Tract Dis 17:137–141. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182630c41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. [30]Xi LF, Hughes JP, Castle PE, Edelstein ZR, Wang C, Galloway DA, Koutsky LA, Kiviat NB, Schiffman M. 2011. Viral load in the natural history of human papillomavirus type 16 infection: a nested case-control study. J Infect Dis 203:1425–1433. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [31]Kovacic MB, Castle PE, Herrero R, Schiffman M, Sherman ME, Wacholder S, Rodriguez AC, Hutchinson ML, Bratti MC, Hildesheim A, Morales J, Alfaro M, Burk RD. 2006. Relationships of human papillomavirus type, qualitative viral load, and age with cytologic abnormality. Cancer Res 66:10112–10119. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [32]Castle PE, Schiffman M, Scott DR, Sherman ME, Glass AG, Rush BB, Schussler JE, Wacholder S, Lorincz AT. 2005. Semiquantitative human papillomavirus type 16 viral load and the prospective risk of cervical precancer and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:1311–1314. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [33]Lorincz AT, Castle PE, Sherman ME, Scott DR, Glass AG, Wacholder S, Rush BB, Gravitt PE, Schussler JE, Schiffman M. 2002. Viral load of human papillomavirus and risk of CIN3 or cervical cancer. Lancet 360:228–229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09463-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demarco, M., Carter-Pokras, O., Hyun, N., Castle, P. E., He, X., Dallal, C. M., Chen, J., Gage, J. C., Befano, B., Fetterman, B., Lorey, T., Poitras, N., Raine-Bennett, T. R., Wentzensen, N., & Schiffman, M.
Affiliations
  • Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (US)
  • University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland, USA
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Information Management Services (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Northern California (US)
  • Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2018-05
Volume
56
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2790419431
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
human papillomavirus, HPV genotyping, cervical cancer screening, cobas HPV test, test agreement, HPV16, HPV 18, high-risk HPV, Hybrid Capture 2, histological severity, assay validation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervix Uteri, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Genotype, Humans, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer, Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review