Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,124

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity

Open access
Hunter, P R, Gaston, M A·1988·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

An index of discrimination for typing methods is described, based on the probability of two unrelated strains being characterized as the same type. This index may be used to compare typing methods and select the most discriminatory system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2465-2466.1988

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,124

Metadata

Authors
Hunter, P. R., & Gaston, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1988-11
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
2465-2466
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2098618245
Cited by
3,124
References
0
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.26.11.2465-2466.1988
The paper
Hunter, P. R., & Gaston, M. A. (1988). Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.26.11.2465-2466.1988

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.