The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction
Open accessAbstract
A simple and reliable method using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was devised to identify methicillin-resistant staphylococci. By using lysates of the strain to be tested as templates and 22-mer oligonucleotides as primers, a 533-bp region of mecA, the structural gene of a low-affinity penicillin-binding protein (PBP 2'), was amplified by PCR and detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results obtained by this method were compared with those obtained by broth microdilution MIC determination for 210 and 100 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, respectively. Of 99 mecA-negative S. aureus isolates, 100% of the strains were methicillin susceptible and 98% of the strains were oxacillin susceptible. Three strains (3%) of 111 mecA-positive S. aureus isolates exhibited almost the same susceptibility to beta-lactams as the mecA-negative ones and did not produce detectable amounts of PBP 2' despite the presence of the mecA gene. One of them yielded typically methicillin-resistant variants at a low frequency with concomitant recovery of PBP 2' production. The mecA gene was also found in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Staphylococcus caprae and conferred resistance on most of the bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Cited by
Nasal Carriage as a Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
von Eiff, C., Becker, K., Machka, K., Stammer, H., & Peters, G. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200101043440102 · Cited by 1,984
Gillet, Y., Issartel, B., Vanhems, P., Fournet, J.-C., Lina, G., Bes, M., Vandenesch, F., Piémont, Y., Brousse, N., Floret, D., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07877-7 · Cited by 1,514
Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci
Kloos, W. E., & Bannerman, T. L. (1994) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.7.1.117 · Cited by 835
Lee, J. H. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.11.6489-6494.2003 · Cited by 513
Boedicker, J. Q., Li, L., Kline, T. R., & Ismagilov, R. F. (2008) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b804911d · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Murakami, K., Minamide, W., Wada, K., Nakamura, E., Teraoka, H., & Watanabe, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2240-2244
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1916238341
- Cited by
- 942
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.29.10.2240-2244.1991
- The paper
- Murakami, K., Minamide, W., Wada, K., Nakamura, E., Teraoka, H., & Watanabe, S. (1991). Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.10.2240-2244.1991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.