Cited by 1,984Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementStreptococcal Infections and Treatments

Nasal Carriage as a Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Open access
von Eiff, Christof, Becker, Karsten, Machka, Konstanze, Stammer, Holger, Peters, Georg·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The consequences of infection with Staphylococcus aureus can be severe, so strategies for prevention are important. We examined S. aureus isolates from blood and from nasal specimens to determine whether the organisms in the bloodstream originated from the patient's own flora. METHODS: In a multicenter study, swabs for culture were obtained from the anterior nares of 219 patients with S. aureus bacteremia. A total of 723 isolates were collected and genotyped. In a second study, 1640 S. aureus isolates from nasal swabs were collected over a period of five years and then compared with isolates from the blood of patients who subsequently had S. aureus bacteremia. RESULTS: In the multicenter study of S. aureus bacteremia, the blood isolates were identical to those from the anterior nares in 180 of 219 patients (82.2 percent). In the second study, 14 of 1278 patients who had nasal colonization with S. aureus subsequently had S. aureus bacteremia. In 12 of these 14 patients (86 percent), the isolates obtained from the nares were clonally identical to the isolates obtained from blood 1 day to 14 months later. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of cases of S. aureus bacteremia appear to be of endogenous origin since they originate from colonies in the nasal mucosa. These results provide support for strategies to prevent systemic S. aureus infections by eliminating nasal carriage of S. aureus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200101043440102

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • S. aureus nasal carriage is a risk factor for subsequent development of community-acquired and nosocomial staphylococcal infections.

    “S. aureus nasal carriage, present in about 20% of the general population, has been identified as a risk factor for the subsequent development of community-acquired and nosocomial staphylococcal infections (14, 22).”

    From Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Nasal Carriage among Injection Drug Users: Six Years Later (2008) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion (page not provided) associates nasal carriage with increased infection risk in surgical and dialysis patients and identifies it as a risk factor for nosocomial bacteremia during an ICU outbreak. The paper also reports that nasal strains preceded bloodstream infections, but it does not establish carriage as a risk factor specifically for community-acquired infections. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • S. aureus nasal carriage is present in about 20% of the general population.

    “S. aureus nasal carriage, present in about 20% of the general population, has been identified as a risk factor for the subsequent development of community-acquired and nosocomial staphylococcal infections (14, 22).”
  • Iron acquisition is necessary for Staphylococcus aureus colonization and for the pathogenesis that follows.

    “Iron acquisition is required for S. aureus colonization and subsequent pathogenesis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Moellering RC Jr. Problems with antimicrobial resistance in gram-pos- itive cocci. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1177-8.
  2. Wallenstein S. A non-iterative accurate asymptotic confidence interval for the difference between two proportions. Stat Med 1997;16:1329-36.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Eiff, C., Becker, K., Machka, K., Stammer, H., & Peters, G.
Affiliations
University of Münster (DE)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-01-04
Volume
344
Issue
1
Pages
11-16
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2330028620
Cited by
1,984
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 107 · 2012: 89
FWCI
46.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Keywords
Staphylococcus aureus, bacteremia, nasal carriage, endogenous infection, anterior nares, clonal identity, bloodstream infection, infection control, genotyping
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carrier State, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross Infection, Female, Germany, Hospitals, Community, Hospitals, General, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Nose, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Methicillin Resistance, Bacteremia, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review