The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of genes for enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus by the polymerase chain reaction
Open accessAbstract
Eight pairs of synthetic oligonucleotide primers were used in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol to detect genes for staphylococcal enterotoxins A to E, exfoliative toxins A and B, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from clinical specimens and contaminated foods. Primers were targeted to internal regions of the toxin genes, and amplification fragments were detected after the PCR by agarose gel electrophoresis. Unequivocal discrimination of toxin genes was obtained by the PCR by using nucleic acids extracted from 88 strains of S. aureus whose toxigenicity was established biologically and immunologically. In immunological assays, two strains of S. aureus produced equivocal results for production of enterotoxin C or toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, giving an overall concordance between phenotypic and genotypic identification of 97.7%. Primer specificity was established in the PCR by using nucleic acids from known toxin-producing bacterial pathogens and from nontoxigenic S. aureus. Strains of Streptococcus spp., including some producers of pyrogenic exotoxin A carrying the speA gene, were negative by the PCR designed to detect staphylococcal toxins. The detection limits were established for all the staphylococcal toxin genes within their respective PCR protocols. The identification of staphylococcal toxin genes in strains of S. aureus by the PCR offers a very specific, sensitive, relatively rapid, and inexpensive alternative to traditional immunological assays which depend on adequate gene expression for reliability and sensitivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in Humans and Animals, Central Europe
Witte, W., Strommenger, B., Stanek, C., & Cuny, C. (2007) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1302.060924 · Cited by 386
Coagulase-positive Staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus in food products marketed in Italy
Normanno, G., Firinu, A., Virgilio, S., Mula, G., Dambrosio, A., Poggiu, A., Decastelli, L., Mioni, R., Scuota, S., Bolzoni, G., et al. (2005) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.008 · Cited by 274
Staphylococcus simiae sp. nov., isolated from South American squirrel monkeys
Pantůček, R., Sedláček, I., Petráš, P., Koukalová, D., Švec, P., Štětina, V., Vancanneyt, M., Chrastinová, L., Vokurková, J., Růžičková, V., et al. (2005) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63590-0 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, W. M., Tyler, S. D., Ewan, E. P., Ashton, F. E., Pollard, D. R., & Rozee, K. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 426-430
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2102383275
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of genes for enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus by the polymerase chain reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.29.3.426-430.1991
- The paper
- Johnson, W. M., Tyler, S. D., Ewan, E. P., Ashton, F. E., Pollard, D. R., & Rozee, K. R. (1991). Detection of genes for enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus by the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.3.426-430.1991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.