Cited by 327Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotic Use and Resistance

Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria

Open access
Baker, C N, Stocker, S A, Culver, D H, Thornsberry, C·1991·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

The E Test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) is a new method for performing antimicrobial susceptibility tests. It consists of an impervious carrier (5- by 50-mm strip) with a predefined antimicrobic gradient which is placed on an inoculated agar plate and processed like a disk diffusion test. Results are generated directly as MICs from a continuous concentration gradient covering 15 twofold dilutions, and MICs are read where the edge of the inhibition zone intersects the strip. We compared the E Test with disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and agar dilution tests by using a challenge set of 195 gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria for 14 antimicrobial agents. Also, disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and agar dilution tests were compared with each other. All test method comparisons gave greater than 94% agreement for the category of susceptibility. The E Test category agreement with disk diffusion and broth microdilution was 95.1%, and with agar dilution it was 95.2%. The E Test results were as reliable as the results obtained by the standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.29.3.533-538.1991

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have shown a good correlation between MIC values determined by Etest and those obtained by broth dilution or agar dilution.

    “Several previous studies have shown a good correlation between the MIC values determined by Etest and those obtained by broth dilution or agar dilution method [25], [26], [27].”
  • The method discussed in the preceding section shows good correlation with Etest, mostly for antibacterial testing against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

    “This method presents a good correlation with Etest mostly for antibacterial testing against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.”
  • Category comparisons of agar dilution, disk-diffusion and broth microdilution methods give excellent results.

    “Moreover, category comparisons of agar dilution, disk-diffusion and broth microdilution methods give excellent results [25].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, C. N., Stocker, S. A., Culver, D. H., & Thornsberry, C.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1991-03
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
533-538
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W1486807157
Cited by
327
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
E-test, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, minimum inhibitory concentration, disk diffusion, broth microdilution, agar dilution, method comparison, Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, antimicrobial agents
MeSH terms
Agar, Bacteria, Culture Media, Diffusion, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Microbial Sensitivity Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review