Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rochalimaea henselae sp. nov., a cause of septicemia, bacillary angiomatosis, and parenchymal bacillary peliosis

Open access
Welch, D F, Pickett, D A, Slater, L N, Steigerwalt, A G, Brenner, D J·1992·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Nine strains of Rochalimaea spp. that were isolated from patients over a period of 4.5 years were characterized for their enzyme activities, cellular fatty acid compositions, and DNA interrelatedness among Rochalimaea spp., Bartonella bacilliformis, and Afipia felis (cat scratch disease bacillus). All except one isolate, which was Rochalimaea quintana, were determined to belong to a newly proposed species, Rochalimaea henselae sp. nov. After recovery from clinical material, colonies required 5 to 15 days of incubation to become apparent. Cells were small, gram-negative, curved bacilli and displayed twitching motility. Enzyme specificities for amino acid and carbohydrate substrates showed that R. henselae could be distinguished from Rochalimaea vinsonii by L-arginyl-L-arginine and L-lysyl-L-alanine peptidases, but not all strains could be distinguished from R. quintana on the basis of peptidases or carbohydrate utilization. R. henselae also closely resembled R. quintana in cellular fatty acid composition, with both consisting mainly of C18:1, C18:0, and C16:0 fatty acids. However, the strains of R. henselae all contained C18:0 in amounts averaging greater than or equal to 22%, in contrast to R. quintana, which contained this cellular fatty acid in amounts averaging 16 and 18%. DNA hybridization confirmed the identification of one clinical isolate as R. quintana and showed a close interrelatedness (92 to 100%) among the other strains. Under optimal conditions for DNA reassociation, R. henselae showed approximately 70% relatedness to R. quintana and approximately 60% relatedness to R. vinsonii. Relatedness with DNA from B. baciliformis was 43%. R. henselae was unrelated to A. felis. R. henselae is the proposed species of a newly recognized member of the family Rickettsiaceae, which is a pathogen that may be encountered in immunocompromised or immunocompetent patients. Prolonged fever with bacteremia or vascular proliferative lesions are clinical manifestations of the agent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.30.2.275-280.1992

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Welch, D. F., Pickett, D. A., Slater, L. N., Steigerwalt, A. G., & Brenner, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1992-02
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
275-280
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W1607919524
Cited by
354
References
1
FWCI
25.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rochalimaea henselae sp. nov., a cause of septicemia, bacillary angiomatosis, and parenchymal bacillary peliosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.30.2.275-280.1992
The paper
Welch, D. F., Pickett, D. A., Slater, L. N., Steigerwalt, A. G., & Brenner, D. J. (1992). Rochalimaea henselae sp. nov., a cause of septicemia, bacillary angiomatosis, and parenchymal bacillary peliosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.2.275-280.1992

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.