Cited by 617Bartonella species infections researchVector-borne infectious diseasesBacillus and Francisella bacterial research

Experimental transmission of Bartonella henselae by the cat flea

Open access
Chomel, B B, Kasten, R W, Floyd-Hawkins, K, Chi, B, Yamamoto, K, Roberts-Wilson, J, Gurfield, A N, Abbott, R C +2 more·1996·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Bartonella henselae is an emerging bacterial pathogen, causing cat scratch disease and bacillary angiomatosis. Cats bacteremic with B. henselae constitute a large reservoir from which humans become infected. Prevention of human infection depends on elucidation of the natural history and means of feline infection. We studied 47 cattery cats in a private home for 12 months to determine the longitudinal prevalence of B. henselae bacteremia, the prevalence of B. henselae in the fleas infesting these cats, and whether B. henselae is transmitted experimentally to cats via fleas. Vector-mediated transmission of B.henselae isolates was evaluated by removing fleas from the naturally bacteremic, flea-infested cattery cats and transferring these fleas to specific-pathogen-free (SPF) kittens housed in a controlled, arthropod-free University Animal Facility. B. henselae bacteremia was detected in 89% of the 47 naturally infected cattery cats. A total of 132 fleas were removed from cats whose blood was simultaneously cultured during different seasons and were tested individually for the presence of B. henselae DNA by PCR. B. henselae DNA was detected in 34% of 132 fleas, with seasonal variation, but without an association between the presence or the level of bacteremia in the corresponding cat. Cat fleas removed from bacteremic cattery cats transmitted B. henselae to five SPF kittens in two separate experiments; however, control SPF kittens housed with highly bacteremic kittens in the absence of fleas did not become infected. These data demonstrate that the cat flea readily transmits B. henselae to cats. Control of feline infestation with this arthropod vector may provide an important strategy for the prevention of infection of both humans and cats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.34.8.1952-1956.1996

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infection of cats by bites of infected fleas has been experimentally demonstrated, although it is not considered a primary route of transmission.

    “Infection of cats by bites of infected fleas has been experimentally demonstrated, although not considered a primary route of transmission [30,44,45].”
  • Human infection by flea-borne Bartonella spp. generally occurs via scratches of infected cats, while flea bites do not seem to play a key role in the epidemiology of human bartonellosis.

    “The human infection by flea-borne Bartonella spp. generally occurs via scratches of infected cats, whilst flea bites do not seem to play a key role in the epidemiology of human bartonellosis.”
  • Fleas of pets are capable of harboring Bartonella spp. and it seems plausible that Ctenocephalides felis transmits Bartonella henselae actively.

    “Fleas of pets are capable of harboring Bartonella spp. and it seems plausible that C. felis transmits B. henselae actively.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chomel, B. B., Kasten, R. W., Floyd-Hawkins, K., Chi, B., Yamamoto, K., Roberts-Wilson, J., Gurfield, A. N., Abbott, R. C., Pedersen, N. C., & Koehler, J. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1996-08
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1952-1956
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2118874922
Cited by
617
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 34
FWCI
15.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ai036075-05)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R29 AI36075)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bartonella species infections research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Keywords
Bartonella henselae, Ctenocephalides felis, cat scratch disease, bacillary angiomatosis, flea infestation, seasonal variation, experimental transmission, zoonotic transmission
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Cat Diseases, Cat-Scratch Disease, Cats, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Siphonaptera, Humans, Insect Vectors, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Skin, Prevalence, Bacteremia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review