The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of the reactivities of baculovirus-expressed recombinant Norwalk virus capsid antigen with those of the native Norwalk virus antigen in serologic assays and some epidemiologic observations
Open accessAbstract
Since the discovery of the Norwalk virus (NV) by immune electron microscopy (IEM) in 1972, serologic studies with this virus have relied on particle-positive fecal material from infected volunteers as the source of antigen because it has not been possible to propagate this virus in cell culture. However, the recent cloning of the NV (strain 8FIIa) genome and expression of the capsid protein in a baculovirus system to form "virus-like particles" has provided a consistent source of antigen (designated rNV). The purpose of the present study was to compare the antigenicities of these rNV particles with those of native NV antigen derived from human fecal material by using well-characterized sera obtained from earlier studies. In IEM studies, the rNV antigen reacted with NV-specific antibodies in a manner similar to that observed previously when particle-positive fecal material was used as antigen. In addition, a direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, in which the rNV antigen was used as antigen, proved efficient and specific for the detection of serologic responses to NV compared with the previously established techniques of IEM and blocking antibody immunoassays in which particle-positive fecal material was used as the antigen. The availability of an unlimited source of antigen will enable serologic studies that will greatly increase our understanding of the epidemiology of NV and its role in human enteric illness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Noroviruses: A comprehensive review
Patel, M. M., Hall, A. J., Vinjé, J., & Parashar, U. D. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Virology · doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2008.10.009 · Cited by 766
Norwalk Virus Infection and Disease Is Associated with ABO Histo–Blood Group Type
Hutson, A. M., Atmar, R. L., Graham, D. Y., & Estes, M. K. (2002) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/339883 · Cited by 487
Self-citationDiagnosis of Noncultivatable Gastroenteritis Viruses, the Human Caliciviruses
Atmar, R. L., & Estes, M. K. (2001) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.14.1.15-37.2001 · Cited by 375
Self-citationNorovirus and its histo-blood group antigen receptors: an answer to a historical puzzle
Tan, M., & Jiang, X. (2005) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2005.04.004 · Cited by 317
Self-citationSerological Correlate of Protection against Norovirus‐Induced Gastroenteritis
Reeck, A., Kavanagh, O., Estes, M. K., Opekun, A. R., Gilger, M. A., Graham, D. Y., & Atmar, R. L. (2010) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/656364 · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, K. Y., Lew, J. F., Jiang, X., Kapikian, A. Z., & Estes, M. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2185-2191
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1582121307
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the reactivities of baculovirus-expressed recombinant Norwalk virus capsid antigen with those of the native Norwalk virus antigen in serologic assays and some epidemiologic observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.31.8.2185-2191.1993
- The paper
- Green, K. Y., Lew, J. F., Jiang, X., Kapikian, A. Z., & Estes, M. K. (1993). Comparison of the reactivities of baculovirus-expressed recombinant Norwalk virus capsid antigen with those of the native Norwalk virus antigen in serologic assays and some epidemiologic observations. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.31.8.2185-2191.1993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.