The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simultaneous PCR detection of Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 from genital ulcers
Open accessAbstract
A multiplex PCR (M-PCR) assay with colorimetric detection was devised for the simultaneous amplification of DNA targets from Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2. By using target-specific oligonucleotides in a microwell format, 298 genital ulcer swab specimens collected in New Orleans during three intervals from 1992 through 1994 were evaluated. The results of the M-PCR assay were compared with the results of dark-field microscopy and H. ducreyi culture on two different culture media. HSV culture results were available for 99 specimens collected during the third interval. Confirmatory PCR assays targeting different gene sequences for each of the three organisms were used to validate the M-PCR results. Specimens were resolved as positive for the determination of sensitivity if the reference diagnostic test was positive or if the results of both the M-PCR and the confirmatory PCR were positive. The resolved sensitivities of M-PCR for HSV, H. ducreyi, and T. pallidum were 100, 98.4, and 91%, respectively. The resolved sensitivities of HSV culture, H. ducreyi culture, and dark-field microscopy were 71.8, 74.2, and 81%, respectively. These results indicate that the M-PCR assay is more sensitive than standard diagnostic tests for the detection of HSV, H. ducreyi, and T. pallidum from genital ulcers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Syphilis: Review with Emphasis on Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Some Biologic Features
Singh, A. E., & Romanowski, B. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.2.187 · Cited by 638
Multiplex PCR: Optimization and Application in Diagnostic Virology
Elnifro, E. M., Ashshi, A. M., Cooper, R. J., & Klapper, P. E. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.4.559-570.2000 · Cited by 964
Single-dose azithromycin versus penicillin G benzathine for the treatment of early syphilis.
Riedner, G., Rusizoka, M., Todd, J., Maboko, L., Hoelscher, M., Mmbando, D., Samky, E., Lyamuya, E., Mabey, D., Grosskurth, H., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa044284 · Cited by 296
The clinical diagnosis of genital ulcer disease in men.
DiCarlo, R. P., & Martin, D. H. (1997) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/514548 · Cited by 152
Self-citationUse of PCR in the diagnosis of early syphilis in the United Kingdom
Palmer, H. M. (2003) · Sexually Transmitted Infections · doi:10.1136/sti.79.6.479 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Orle, K. A., Gates, C. A., Martin, D. H., Body, B. A., & Weiss, J. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-54
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2165862558
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simultaneous PCR detection of Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 from genital ulcers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.34.1.49-54.1996
- The paper
- Orle, K. A., Gates, C. A., Martin, D. H., Body, B. A., & Weiss, J. B. (1996). Simultaneous PCR detection of Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 from genital ulcers. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.34.1.49-54.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.