The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vector potential of houseflies (Musca domestica) for Helicobacter pylori
Open accessAbstract
The mode of transmission of Helicobacter pylori is unknown. Since viable bacteria have been shown to be excreted in feces from infected individuals and houseflies habitually develop and feed on excrement, we hypothesized that flies ingest and harbor H. pylori and, in turn, contaminate the human environment. This study examined the possible vector potential of houseflies (Musca domestica) for H. pylori. Caged houseflies were exposed to freshly grown H. pylori on agar plates. After a 6-h feeding period, the plates were removed and were replaced with sterile petri dishes containing a droplet of sterile brucella broth. At regular intervals, small numbers of houseflies were removed for microbiological and histological analysis, and the petri dishes were replaced with fresh sterile plates with fresh drops of brucella broth. The flies' bodies, the flies' dissected alimentary tracts, and excreta on the petri dishes were cultured for H. pylori, whose identity was confirmed by the urease, catalase, and oxidase reactions and Gram staining. In contrast to control flies, viable H. pylori could be isolated from external surfaces for up to 12 h and from gut and excreta for as long as 30 h after the initial feeding period. After 30 h other gram-negative bacteria overgrew the cultures of samples from all locations tested, rendering the selective culture of H. pylori colonies impossible. Histological analysis revealed Helicobacter-like organisms in the gut lumen and attached to intestinal epithelial cells. We conclude that houseflies can harbor viable H. pylori on their bodies and in their intestinal tracts. They are also able to disseminate viable H. pylori in excreta, and they may therefore present a significant reservoir and be a vector in the transmission of H. pylori.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ernst, P. B., & Gold, B. D. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.615 · Cited by 554
Natural history and epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection
Go, M. F. (2002) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.0160s1003.x · Cited by 440
Helicobacter in the developing world
Frenck, R. W., & Clemens, J. (2003) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00112-6 · Cited by 310
A systematic review of human pathogens carried by the housefly (Musca domestica L.)
Khamesipour, F., Lankarani, K. B., Honarvar, B., & Kwenti, T. E. (2018) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5934-3 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Grübel, P., Hoffman, J. S., Chong, F. K., Burstein, N. A., Mepani, C., & Cave, D. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1300-1303
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2157494039
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vector potential of houseflies (Musca domestica) for Helicobacter pylori. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.35.6.1300-1303.1997
- The paper
- Grübel, P., Hoffman, J. S., Chong, F. K., Burstein, N. A., Mepani, C., & Cave, D. R. (1997). Vector potential of houseflies (Musca domestica) for Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.6.1300-1303.1997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.