Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 576

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of In Vitro Activities of the New Triazole SCH56592 and the Echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against Opportunistic Filamentous and Dimorphic Fungi and Yeasts

Open access
Espinel-Ingroff, Ana·1998·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

The in vitro antifungal activities of SCH56592, MK-0991, and LY303366 against 83 isolates of Acremonium strictum , Aspergillus flavus , Aspergillus fumigatus , Aspergillus terreus , Bipolaris spp., Blastomyces dermatitidis , Cladophialophora bantiana , Fusarium oxysporum , Fusarium solani , Histoplasma capsulatum , Phialophora spp., Pseudallescheria boydii , Rhizopus arrhizus , Scedosporium prolificans , and Sporothrix schenckii were compared. The in vitro activities of these agents against 104 isolates of yeast pathogens of Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans , and Trichosporon beigelii were also compared. MICs were determined by following a procedure under evaluation by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for broth microdilution testing of the filamentous fungi (visual MICs) and the NCCLS M27-A broth microdilution method for yeasts (both visual and turbidimetric MICs). The in vitro fungicidal activity of SCH56592 was superior (minimum fungicidal concentrations [MFCs], 0.25 to 4 μg/ml for 7 of 18 species tested) to those of MK-0991 and LY303366 (MFCs, 8 to >16 μg/ml for all species tested) for the molds tested, but the echinocandins had a broader spectrum of fungicidal activity (MFCs at which 90% of strains are inhibited [MFC 90 s], 0.5 to 4 μg/ml for 6 of 9 species tested) than SCH56592 (MFC 90 s, 0.25 to 8 μg/ml for 4 of 9 species tested) against most of the yeasts tested. Neither echinocandin had in vitro activity (MICs, >16 μg/ml) against C. neoformans and T. beigelii , while the SCH56592 MICs ranged from 0.12 to 1.0 μg/ml for these two species. The MICs of the three agents for the other species ranged from <0.03 to 4 μg/ml. These results suggest that these new agents have broad-spectrum activities in vitro; their effectiveness in the treatment of human mycoses is to be determined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.36.10.2950-2956.1998

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 576

Metadata

Authors
Espinel-Ingroff, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1998-10
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
2950-2956
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2104445943
Cited by
576
References
3
FWCI
15.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of In Vitro Activities of the New Triazole SCH56592 and the Echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against Opportunistic Filamentous and Dimorphic Fungi and Yeasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.36.10.2950-2956.1998
The paper
Espinel-Ingroff, A. (1998). Comparison of In Vitro Activities of the New Triazole SCH56592 and the Echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against Opportunistic Filamentous and Dimorphic Fungi and Yeasts. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.36.10.2950-2956.1998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.