The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid Differentiation of Closely Related Candida Species and Strains by Pyrolysis-Mass Spectrometry and Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Two rapid spectroscopic approaches for whole-organism fingerprinting of pyrolysis-mass spectrometry (PyMS) and Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) were used to analyze a group of 29 clinical and reference Candida isolates. These strains had been identified by conventional means as belonging to one of the three species Candida albicans , C. dubliniensis (previously reported as atypical C. albicans ), and C. stellatoidea (which is also closely related to C. albicans ). To observe the relationships of the 29 isolates as judged by PyMS and FT-IR, the spectral data were clustered by discriminant analysis. On visual inspection of the cluster analyses from both methods, three distinct clusters, which were discrete for each of the Candida species, could be seen. Moreover, these phenetic classifications were found to be very similar to those obtained by genotypic studies which examined the Hin fI restriction enzyme digestion patterns of genomic DNA and by use of the 27A C. albicans -specific probe. Both spectroscopic techniques are rapid (typically, 2 min for PyMS and 10 s for FT-IR) and were shown to be capable of successfully discriminating between closely related isolates of C. albicans , C. dubliniensis , and C. stellatoidea . We believe that these whole-organism fingerprinting methods could provide opportunities for automation in clinical microbial laboratories, improving turnaround times and the use of resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 · Cited by 21,904
Sullivan, D. J., Haynes, K. A., Bennett, D. E., Coleman, D. C., & Westerneng, T. J. (1995) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/13500872-141-7-1507 · Cited by 763
Cited by
Goodacre, R., Shann, B., Gilbert, R. J., Timmins, É. M., McGovern, A. C., Alsberg, B. K., Kell, D. B., & Logan, N. A. (2000) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac990661i · Cited by 305
Self-citationDriver, T., Bajhaiya, A. K., Allwood, J. W., Goodacre, R., Pittman, J. K., & Dean, A. P. (2015) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2015.06.009 · Cited by 107
Self-citationBajhaiya, A. K., Dean, A. P., Driver, T., Trivedi, D. K., Rattray, N. J. W., Allwood, J. W., Goodacre, R., & Pittman, J. K. (2016) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-015-0878-4 · Cited by 49
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Timmins, E. M., Howell, S. A., Alsberg, B. K., Noble, W. C., & Goodacre, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 367-374
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2108855221
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid Differentiation of Closely Related Candida Species and Strains by Pyrolysis-Mass Spectrometry and Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.36.2.367-374.1998
- The paper
- Timmins, E. M., Howell, S. A., Alsberg, B. K., Noble, W. C., & Goodacre, R. (1998). Rapid Differentiation of Closely Related Candida Species and Strains by Pyrolysis-Mass Spectrometry and Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.36.2.367-374.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.