The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitation of Bacteria in Blood of Typhoid Fever Patients and Relationship between Counts and Clinical Features, Transmissibility, and Antibiotic Resistance
Open accessAbstract
Salmonella typhi was isolated from 369 and Salmonella paratyphi A was isolated from 6 of 515 Vietnamese patients with suspected enteric fever. Compared with conventional broth culture of blood, direct plating of the buffy coat had a diagnostic sensitivity of 99.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.1 to 100%). Blood bacterial counts were estimated by the pour plate method. The median S. typhi count in blood was 1 CFU/ml (range, <0.3 to 387 CFU/ml), of which a mean of 63% (95% CI, 58 to 67%) were intracellular. The mean number of bacteria per infected leukocyte was 1.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.7 to 2.4) CFU/cell ( n = 81). Children (<15 years old; n = 115) had higher median blood bacterial counts than adults ( n = 262): 1.5 (range, <0.3 to 387) versus 0.6 (range, <0.3 to 17.7) CFU/ml ( P = 0.008), and patients who excreted S. typhi in feces had higher bacteremias than those who did not: a median of 3 (range, <0.3 to 32) versus 1 (range, <0.3 to 68) CFU/ml ( P = 0.02). Blood bacterial counts declined with increasing duration of illness ( P = 0.002) and were higher in infections caused by multidrug-resistant S. typhi (1.3 [range, <0.3 to 387] CFU/ml; n = 313) than in infections caused by antibiotic-sensitive S. typhi (0.5 [range, <0.3 to 32] CFU/ml; n = 62) ( P = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis this proved to be an independent association, suggesting a relationship between antibiotic resistance and virulence in S. typhi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Typhoid fever: pathogenesis and immunologic control
Hornick, R. B., Greisman, S. E., Woodward, T. E., DuPont, H. L., Dawkins, A. T., & Snyder, M. J. (1970) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197009242831306 · Cited by 565
Cited by
Crump, J. A., Sjölund-Karlsson, M., Gordon, M. A., & Parry, C. M. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-15 · Cited by 1,156
Self-citationParry, C. M., Hien, T. T., Dougan, G., White, N. J., & Farrar, J. J. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra020201 · Cited by 1,112
Self-citationSepsis: a roadmap for future research
Cohen, J., Vincent, J.-L., Adhikari, N. K. J., Machado, F. R., Angus, D. C., Calandra, T., Jaton, K., Giulieri, S., Delaloye, J., Opal, S., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(15)70112-x · Cited by 992
Shane, A. L., Mody, R. K., Crump, J. A., Tarr, P. I., Steiner, T. S., Kotloff, K., Langley, J. M., Wanke, C., Warren, C. A., Cheng, A. C., et al. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cix669 · Cited by 627
Shane, A. L., Mody, R. K., Crump, J. A., Tarr, P. I., Steiner, T. S., Kotloff, K., Langley, J. M., Wanke, C., Warren, C. A., Cheng, A. C., et al. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cix959 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Wain, J., Diep, T. S., Ho, V. A., Walsh, A. M., Hoa, N. T. T., Parry, C. M., & White, N. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1683-1687
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2129938023
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitation of Bacteria in Blood of Typhoid Fever Patients and Relationship between Counts and Clinical Features, Transmissibility, and Antibiotic Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.36.6.1683-1687.1998
- The paper
- Wain, J., Diep, T. S., Ho, V. A., Walsh, A. M., Hoa, N. T. T., Parry, C. M., & White, N. J. (1998). Quantitation of Bacteria in Blood of Typhoid Fever Patients and Relationship between Counts and Clinical Features, Transmissibility, and Antibiotic Resistance. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.36.6.1683-1687.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.