The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Follow-Up of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage after 8 Years: Redefining the Persistent Carrier State
Open accessAbstract
Studies of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage have distinguished three carriage patterns: persistent, intermittent, and noncarriage. The criteria used to identify these carriage patterns have been inconsistent. In 1988 the S. aureus nasal carrier index, i.e., the proportion of nasal swab specimen cultures yielding S. aureus , was determined for 91 staff members of various departments of a large university hospital by obtaining weekly nasal swab specimens for culture over a 12-week period. Thirty-three (36%) persons had carrier indices of 0.80 or higher, 15 (17%) had indices between 0.1 and 0.7, and 43 (47%) had indices of zero. In 1995, 17 individuals with carrier indices of 0.80 or higher in 1988 were available for reexamination. For 12 (71%) of these individuals, S. aureus was again isolated from a single nasal swab, i.e., from each individual with a 1988 carrier index of 1.0 but from only half of those with indices below 1.0. Genotyping (by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) of all S. aureus strains showed that strains isolated from only three individuals, all with 1988 carrier indices of 1.0, in 1988 and 1995 showed genetic similarity. In conclusion, persistent S. aureus nasal carriage is a unique characteristic of a fraction of the population, and the attribute “persistent” should be confined to those individuals for whom serial nasal swab specimen cultures consistently yield S. aureus .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections
Wertheim, H. F., Melles, D. C., Vos, M. C., van Leeuwen, W., van Belkum, A., Verbrugh, H. A., & Nouwen, J. L. (2005) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70295-4 · Cited by 2,685
Self-citationNasal Carriage as a Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
von Eiff, C., Becker, K., Machka, K., Stammer, H., & Peters, G. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200101043440102 · Cited by 1,984
Sakr, A., Brégeon, F., Mège, J.-L., Rolain, J.-M., & Blin, O. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02419 · Cited by 555
Bacterial Competition for Human Nasal Cavity Colonization: Role of Staphylococcal agr Alleles
Lina, G., Boutite, F., Tristan, A., Bes, M., Etienne, J., & Vandenesch, F. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.1.18-23.2003 · Cited by 381
What determines nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus?
Peacock, S. J., de Silva, I., & Lowy, F. D. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(01)02254-5 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- VandenBergh, M. F. Q., Yzerman, E. P. F., van Belkum, A., Boelens, H. A. M., Sijmons, M., & Verbrugh, H. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3133-3140
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2101611968
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Follow-Up of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage after 8 Years: Redefining the Persistent Carrier State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.37.10.3133-3140.1999
- The paper
- VandenBergh, M. F. Q., Yzerman, E. P. F., van Belkum, A., Boelens, H. A. M., Sijmons, M., & Verbrugh, H. A. (1999). Follow-Up of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage after 8 Years: Redefining the Persistent Carrier State. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.10.3133-3140.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.